Influence of personalized replacement protocol and low-level laser therapy combined with vibration on tooth movement rate and tooth movement accuracy in clear aligner treatment: a randomized clinical trial.
{"title":"Influence of personalized replacement protocol and low-level laser therapy combined with vibration on tooth movement rate and tooth movement accuracy in clear aligner treatment: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Zeyao Miao, Liling Ren, Haijuan Zhang, Chengdong Zheng, Yuxuan Yang, Jinyuan Zhu, Yandong Han, Shuang Wang","doi":"10.2319/100424-813.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the influence of personalized aligner replacement, with or without physical methods of acceleration using low-frequency vibration combined with a low-level laser, on the tooth movement rate and accuracy of clear aligners.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty participants were randomly allocated to three groups. Fourteen participants used the standard replacement protocol in Group A, Group B included 14 participants using a personalized replacement protocol, and 12 participants in Group C followed the personalized replacement protocol and used a physical device that combined low-frequency vibration and low-level laser. Aligner replacement cycles of the first 12 steps were recorded, and GOM inspect suite software 2022 (GOM; Braunschweig, Germany) was used to evaluate maxillary molar movement accuracy using digital models collected before treatment and at the end of the 12th step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found in the accuracy of maxillary molar movement between Groups A and B, but the tooth movement rate in Group B was significantly greater. The accuracy of maxillary molar movement was similar in Groups B and C, and the tooth movement rate in Group C was significantly increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The personalized replacement protocol decreased the number of aligner replacement cycles without impacting the accuracy of tooth movement. With personalized replacement, a physical method of acceleration combining low-level laser and low-frequency vibration significantly accelerated orthodontic tooth movement and had little influence on the accuracy of tooth movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/100424-813.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of personalized aligner replacement, with or without physical methods of acceleration using low-frequency vibration combined with a low-level laser, on the tooth movement rate and accuracy of clear aligners.
Materials and methods: Forty participants were randomly allocated to three groups. Fourteen participants used the standard replacement protocol in Group A, Group B included 14 participants using a personalized replacement protocol, and 12 participants in Group C followed the personalized replacement protocol and used a physical device that combined low-frequency vibration and low-level laser. Aligner replacement cycles of the first 12 steps were recorded, and GOM inspect suite software 2022 (GOM; Braunschweig, Germany) was used to evaluate maxillary molar movement accuracy using digital models collected before treatment and at the end of the 12th step.
Results: No significant difference was found in the accuracy of maxillary molar movement between Groups A and B, but the tooth movement rate in Group B was significantly greater. The accuracy of maxillary molar movement was similar in Groups B and C, and the tooth movement rate in Group C was significantly increased.
Conclusions: The personalized replacement protocol decreased the number of aligner replacement cycles without impacting the accuracy of tooth movement. With personalized replacement, a physical method of acceleration combining low-level laser and low-frequency vibration significantly accelerated orthodontic tooth movement and had little influence on the accuracy of tooth movement.