Personal GP-continuity improves healthcare outcomes in primary care populations - A systematic review.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sven Göran Engström, Malin André, Eva Arvidsson, Carl Johan Östgren, Margareta Troein, Lars Borgquist
{"title":"Personal GP-continuity improves healthcare outcomes in primary care populations - A systematic review.","authors":"Sven Göran Engström, Malin André, Eva Arvidsson, Carl Johan Östgren, Margareta Troein, Lars Borgquist","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Personal continuity is a hallmark for GPs but there is insufficient evidence to support its benefits in ordinary primary-care populations. Aim To investigate the effects of GP- personal continuity on the healthcare outcomes of primary-care populations. Design and Setting Systematic review of quantitative studies investigating associations between personal continuity of care and outcomes such as mortality and healthcare utilisation. Methods Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2023. Due to study heterogeneity the synthesis was conducted narratively; study results were summarised, and expressed as having higher (compared to lower) continuity of care. Certainty of each summarised result was assessed using the GRADE framework. Results Out of 5 792 unique references 18 studies were included in the final analyses. The outcomes were grouped into three categories of summarised outcomes. Higher (when compared to lower) personal continuity with a GP/FP probably prevents premature mortality (moderate certainty: 4 studies, 5 638 305 participants), probably reduces the risk of hospitalisation (moderate certainty: 11 studies, 13 642 684 participants) and probably lowers risk of emergency-department visits (moderate certainty: 7 studies, 3 885 487 participants). Conclusion Higher, compared to lower, continuity in the relationship between GP and patients in primary care populations is associated with reduced mortality, hospitalisation, and emergency-department visits. Relatively small improvements in personal continuity, that may be achieved in most practices, significantly reduce healthcare consumption, and thus influence the access to care, which have implications for healthcare policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Personal continuity is a hallmark for GPs but there is insufficient evidence to support its benefits in ordinary primary-care populations. Aim To investigate the effects of GP- personal continuity on the healthcare outcomes of primary-care populations. Design and Setting Systematic review of quantitative studies investigating associations between personal continuity of care and outcomes such as mortality and healthcare utilisation. Methods Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2023. Due to study heterogeneity the synthesis was conducted narratively; study results were summarised, and expressed as having higher (compared to lower) continuity of care. Certainty of each summarised result was assessed using the GRADE framework. Results Out of 5 792 unique references 18 studies were included in the final analyses. The outcomes were grouped into three categories of summarised outcomes. Higher (when compared to lower) personal continuity with a GP/FP probably prevents premature mortality (moderate certainty: 4 studies, 5 638 305 participants), probably reduces the risk of hospitalisation (moderate certainty: 11 studies, 13 642 684 participants) and probably lowers risk of emergency-department visits (moderate certainty: 7 studies, 3 885 487 participants). Conclusion Higher, compared to lower, continuity in the relationship between GP and patients in primary care populations is associated with reduced mortality, hospitalisation, and emergency-department visits. Relatively small improvements in personal continuity, that may be achieved in most practices, significantly reduce healthcare consumption, and thus influence the access to care, which have implications for healthcare policy.

个人gp连续性改善初级保健人群的医疗保健结果-系统回顾。
个人连续性是全科医生的一个标志,但没有足够的证据支持其在普通初级保健人群中的益处。目的探讨全科医生-个人连续性对初级保健人群保健结果的影响。设计和设置对调查个人护理连续性与死亡率和医疗保健利用等结果之间关系的定量研究进行系统回顾。方法检索2000年1月1日至2023年10月31日发表的文献,检索Embase、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science。由于研究异质性,本文采用叙述性方法进行综合;对研究结果进行总结,并表示具有较高(相对较低)的护理连续性。使用GRADE框架评估每个总结结果的确定性。结果5 792篇文献中有18篇被纳入最终分析。结果被分为三类总结结果。与较低的GP/FP相比,较高的个人连续性可能预防过早死亡(中等确定性:4项研究,5 638 305名参与者),可能降低住院风险(中等确定性:11项研究,13 642 684名参与者),可能降低急诊就诊风险(中等确定性:7项研究,3 885 487名参与者)。结论:与较低的连续性相比,全科医生和初级保健人群患者之间的关系与死亡率、住院率和急诊就诊率的降低有关。在大多数实践中,在个人连续性方面可能实现相对较小的改进,从而大大减少了医疗保健消费,从而影响了获得医疗保健的机会,这对医疗保健政策产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信