Short- and Mid-Term Efficacy and Safety of Novel Sirolimus-Coated Balloon for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Ayers Gilberth Ivano Kalaij, Melani Limenco Benly, Ruth Grace Aurora, Taofan, Suci Indriani, Iwan Dakota, Suko Adiarto
{"title":"Short- and Mid-Term Efficacy and Safety of Novel Sirolimus-Coated Balloon for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ayers Gilberth Ivano Kalaij, Melani Limenco Benly, Ruth Grace Aurora, Taofan, Suci Indriani, Iwan Dakota, Suko Adiarto","doi":"10.1177/15266028251328156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over the years, paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) have been considered a standard treatment for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions due to their higher efficacy compared to noncoated balloon angioplasty. However, some studies have raised concerns about a potential link between PCBs and increased long-term mortality. Although relatively new, sirolimus is studied as an alternative that could be safer and more efficacious.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of novel sirolimus-coated balloons (SCBs) for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. Five single-arm trials met the predefined eligibility criteria for inclusion and were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Data extraction was followed by single-arm meta-analysis in RStudio with meta package software.</p><p><strong>Major findings: </strong>Overall, a total of 5 single-arm trials were included. During 6-month follow-ups, SCBs have proven to have a high primary patency rate (pooled: 92%) and high freedom to target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates (pooled: 96%) with no heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). In terms of safety, the pooled incidence of clinically driven-target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) is 1%, while pooled clinically driven-target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate is 2%, pooled amputation rate is 3%, and pooled incidence of mortality was 1%. During 12-month follow-ups, SCBs have high primary patency rate (pooled: 87%), high freedom to TLR rates (pooled: 96%), low amputation rate (pooled: 3%), and pooled incidence of mortality was 4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Novel SCB is efficacious and safe in treating femoropopliteal lesions and thus could be a prompt alternative in treating FP lesions, although further studies are still needed. Hopefully, this method could be a treatment option for FP disease in symptomatic patients.Clinical ImpactSirolimus-coated balloons (SCBs) offer a promising alternative to paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) for femoropopliteal lesions, demonstrating high efficacy with superior primary patency and low target lesion revascularization rates. The findings suggest SCBs may mitigate safety concerns associated with PCBs, potentially reducing long-term mortality risks. For clinicians, this innovation provides a safer, effective endovascular option, enhancing patient outcomes while maintaining procedural simplicity. With further validation, SCBs could redefine the standard of care for peripheral artery disease, ensuring optimal long-term vascular health with minimal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251328156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251328156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Over the years, paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) have been considered a standard treatment for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions due to their higher efficacy compared to noncoated balloon angioplasty. However, some studies have raised concerns about a potential link between PCBs and increased long-term mortality. Although relatively new, sirolimus is studied as an alternative that could be safer and more efficacious.

Objective: This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of novel sirolimus-coated balloons (SCBs) for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions.

Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. Five single-arm trials met the predefined eligibility criteria for inclusion and were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Data extraction was followed by single-arm meta-analysis in RStudio with meta package software.

Major findings: Overall, a total of 5 single-arm trials were included. During 6-month follow-ups, SCBs have proven to have a high primary patency rate (pooled: 92%) and high freedom to target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates (pooled: 96%) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). In terms of safety, the pooled incidence of clinically driven-target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) is 1%, while pooled clinically driven-target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate is 2%, pooled amputation rate is 3%, and pooled incidence of mortality was 1%. During 12-month follow-ups, SCBs have high primary patency rate (pooled: 87%), high freedom to TLR rates (pooled: 96%), low amputation rate (pooled: 3%), and pooled incidence of mortality was 4%.

Conclusion: Novel SCB is efficacious and safe in treating femoropopliteal lesions and thus could be a prompt alternative in treating FP lesions, although further studies are still needed. Hopefully, this method could be a treatment option for FP disease in symptomatic patients.Clinical ImpactSirolimus-coated balloons (SCBs) offer a promising alternative to paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) for femoropopliteal lesions, demonstrating high efficacy with superior primary patency and low target lesion revascularization rates. The findings suggest SCBs may mitigate safety concerns associated with PCBs, potentially reducing long-term mortality risks. For clinicians, this innovation provides a safer, effective endovascular option, enhancing patient outcomes while maintaining procedural simplicity. With further validation, SCBs could redefine the standard of care for peripheral artery disease, ensuring optimal long-term vascular health with minimal complications.

新型西罗莫司包被球囊治疗股腘动脉病变的中短期疗效和安全性:单组meta分析
多年来,紫杉醇包覆球囊(PCBs)被认为是股腘(FP)病变的标准治疗方法,因为与非包覆球囊血管成形术相比,其疗效更高。然而,一些研究对多氯联苯与长期死亡率增加之间的潜在联系提出了担忧。尽管相对较新,西罗莫司被研究为一种更安全、更有效的替代药物。目的:分析新型西罗莫司包被球囊(SCBs)治疗股腘动脉病变的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:在PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane、Science Direct和谷歌Scholar数据库中进行文献检索。5项单臂试验符合预定的纳入资格标准,并使用ROBINS-I工具进行评估。数据提取后在RStudio中使用meta包软件进行单臂meta分析。主要发现:总体而言,共纳入5项单臂试验。在6个月的随访中,scb被证明具有较高的原发性通畅率(合计:92%)和较高的靶向病变血运重建(TLR)率(合计:96%),且无异质性(I2 = 0%)。在安全性方面,临床驱动靶血管重建术(CD-TVR)的合并发生率为1%,临床驱动靶病变重建术(CD-TLR)的合并发生率为2%,合并截肢率为3%,合并死亡率为1%。在12个月的随访中,scb的原发性通畅率高(合并:87%),TLR自由率高(合并:96%),截肢率低(合并:3%),合并死亡率为4%。结论:新型SCB治疗股腘窝病变有效、安全,可作为治疗FP病变的快速替代方案,但仍需进一步研究。希望这种方法能成为有症状的FP病患者的一种治疗选择。临床影响西罗莫司包被球囊(SCBs)为股腘病变提供了一种有希望的替代紫杉醇包被球囊(pcb)的方法,具有良好的初级通畅和低的靶病变血运重建率。研究结果表明,SCBs可能减轻与多氯联苯相关的安全问题,可能降低长期死亡风险。对于临床医生来说,这项创新提供了一种更安全、有效的血管内选择,在保持手术简单的同时提高了患者的治疗效果。通过进一步验证,scb可以重新定义外周动脉疾病的护理标准,以最小的并发症确保最佳的长期血管健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信