Minimally Invasive Overactive Bladder Therapy After Prolapse Surgery.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Abigail Shatkin-Margolis, Lufan Wang, Farnoosh Nik-Ahd, Leo D Dreyfuss, Kenneth Covinsky, W John Boscardin, Anne M Suskind
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Overactive Bladder Therapy After Prolapse Surgery.","authors":"Abigail Shatkin-Margolis, Lufan Wang, Farnoosh Nik-Ahd, Leo D Dreyfuss, Kenneth Covinsky, W John Boscardin, Anne M Suskind","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Associations between pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder exist, yet little is known regarding minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy use among older women following prolapse surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy use (onabotulinumtoxinA injection, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation) in older women following prolapse surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of a 100% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who had prolapse surgery 2014-2015. The primary outcome was new minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy and the secondary outcome was new overactive bladder diagnosis within Medicare claims data, within 2 years of prolapse surgery. Data were stratified by surgery type (obliterative, apical, anterior/posterior, and apical with anterior/posterior). Modified Poisson regression models were used to calculate relative risk for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 58,841 beneficiaries who underwent prolapse surgery, 1,120 (1.9%) received minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy within 2 years. Among those who underwent prolapse surgery and did not have a preexisting diagnosis of overactive bladder, 9.2% (2,580/28,160) had a new overactive bladder diagnosis within 2 years. Factors associated with the increased adjusted relative risk (aRR) of new minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy included surgery type (apical aRR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.2-2.2 compared to obliterative repair), concomitant stress urinary incontinence surgery (aRR 1.3, 95% CI, 1.2-1.5), preexisting overactive bladder (aRR 4.1, 95% CI, 3.4-4.8), and frailty (mild to severe frailty aRR 3.4, 95% CI, 2.7-4.3 compared to not frail).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rates of minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy following prolapse surgery were low in a national cohort of female Medicare beneficiaries despite a high prevalence of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Associations between pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder exist, yet little is known regarding minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy use among older women following prolapse surgery.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy use (onabotulinumtoxinA injection, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation) in older women following prolapse surgery.

Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of a 100% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who had prolapse surgery 2014-2015. The primary outcome was new minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy and the secondary outcome was new overactive bladder diagnosis within Medicare claims data, within 2 years of prolapse surgery. Data were stratified by surgery type (obliterative, apical, anterior/posterior, and apical with anterior/posterior). Modified Poisson regression models were used to calculate relative risk for each outcome.

Results: Among the 58,841 beneficiaries who underwent prolapse surgery, 1,120 (1.9%) received minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy within 2 years. Among those who underwent prolapse surgery and did not have a preexisting diagnosis of overactive bladder, 9.2% (2,580/28,160) had a new overactive bladder diagnosis within 2 years. Factors associated with the increased adjusted relative risk (aRR) of new minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy included surgery type (apical aRR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.2-2.2 compared to obliterative repair), concomitant stress urinary incontinence surgery (aRR 1.3, 95% CI, 1.2-1.5), preexisting overactive bladder (aRR 4.1, 95% CI, 3.4-4.8), and frailty (mild to severe frailty aRR 3.4, 95% CI, 2.7-4.3 compared to not frail).

Conclusion: Rates of minimally invasive overactive bladder therapy following prolapse surgery were low in a national cohort of female Medicare beneficiaries despite a high prevalence of disease.

脱垂术后膀胱过度活动的微创治疗。
重要性:盆腔器官脱垂和膀胱过度活动之间存在关联,但对于脱垂手术后老年妇女膀胱过度活动微创治疗的应用知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是确定老年妇女脱垂手术后微创过度膀胱治疗(单肉毒杆菌毒素注射,经皮胫神经刺激,骶神经调节)的使用。研究设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,样本为2014-2015年接受脱垂手术的100%自费医疗保险受益人。主要结果是新的微创膀胱过度活动治疗,次要结果是在脱垂手术后2年内,医疗保险索赔数据中新的膀胱过度活动诊断。数据按手术类型(闭塞、根尖、前/后、根尖合并前/后)分层。修正泊松回归模型用于计算每个结果的相对风险。结果:58,841例接受脱垂手术的患者中,有1,120例(1.9%)在2年内接受了微创膀胱过度活动治疗。在接受脱垂手术且先前没有膀胱过度活动的患者中,9.2%(2,580/28,160)在2年内有新的膀胱过度活动诊断。与新型微创膀胱过度活动治疗的调整相对危险度(aRR)增加相关的因素包括手术类型(根尖aRR为1.6,95% CI为1.2-2.2,与闭塞性修复相比)、合并压力性尿失禁手术(aRR为1.3,95% CI为1.2-1.5)、先前存在的膀胱过度活动(aRR为4.1,95% CI为3.4-4.8)和虚弱(轻度至重度虚弱aRR为3.4,95% CI为2.7-4.3,与不虚弱相比)。结论:尽管脱垂手术后膀胱过度活动的发生率很高,但在全国女性医疗保险受益人队列中,脱垂手术后膀胱过度活动的微创治疗率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信