Shweta Kamat, Britny R Brown, Steven A Cohen, Ami Vyas
{"title":"Prophylactic Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist Use Pre- and Post-Choosing Wisely Initiative Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer.","authors":"Shweta Kamat, Britny R Brown, Steven A Cohen, Ami Vyas","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of Choosing Wisely (CW) on prophylactic NK1-RA use among women with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study conducted using administrative claims data. The exposure variable was the start of chemotherapy relative to the implementation date for the CW antiemetic measure. The outcome was prophylactic NK1-RA use. Interrupted time series using segmented regression was used to assess the effect of CW on prophylactic NK1-RA use.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (2010-2018) was used. This study included women aged ≥ 18 years with breast cancer with at least one newly initiated claim for low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy (n = 25,549).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The prophylactic use of NK1-RAs among patients with breast cancer receiving low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy decreased from 11.1% pre-CW to 7.7% post-CW. Segmented regression analysis showed a significant increase of 0.11 per 100 patients per quarter in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs prior to CW recommendation (95% CI = 0.10-0.12; p < 0.0001). However, immediately after the CW (occurred in Q4 2013), there was a significant decline in the prophylactic NK1-RA use by 1.03 per 100 patients in Q2 2014 (-0.93 to -1.13; p < 0.0001). For the time after intervention, there was a significant decline in NK1-RA use by 0.37 per 100 patients per quarter in the post-CW period compared to the pre-CW period (95% CI = -0.36 to -0.38; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights a significant but modest decline in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs. Educational efforts for the dissemination of CW recommendations are needed to facilitate appropriate prophylactic NK1-RAs use.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14626"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine the impact of Choosing Wisely (CW) on prophylactic NK1-RA use among women with breast cancer.
Study setting and design: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted using administrative claims data. The exposure variable was the start of chemotherapy relative to the implementation date for the CW antiemetic measure. The outcome was prophylactic NK1-RA use. Interrupted time series using segmented regression was used to assess the effect of CW on prophylactic NK1-RA use.
Data sources and analytic sample: Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (2010-2018) was used. This study included women aged ≥ 18 years with breast cancer with at least one newly initiated claim for low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy (n = 25,549).
Principal findings: The prophylactic use of NK1-RAs among patients with breast cancer receiving low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy decreased from 11.1% pre-CW to 7.7% post-CW. Segmented regression analysis showed a significant increase of 0.11 per 100 patients per quarter in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs prior to CW recommendation (95% CI = 0.10-0.12; p < 0.0001). However, immediately after the CW (occurred in Q4 2013), there was a significant decline in the prophylactic NK1-RA use by 1.03 per 100 patients in Q2 2014 (-0.93 to -1.13; p < 0.0001). For the time after intervention, there was a significant decline in NK1-RA use by 0.37 per 100 patients per quarter in the post-CW period compared to the pre-CW period (95% CI = -0.36 to -0.38; p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: This study highlights a significant but modest decline in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs. Educational efforts for the dissemination of CW recommendations are needed to facilitate appropriate prophylactic NK1-RAs use.
期刊介绍:
Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.