The effectiveness of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in the management of septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Edi Mustamsir, Aji Aulia Pandu, Alexander Fernando
{"title":"The effectiveness of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in the management of septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Edi Mustamsir, Aji Aulia Pandu, Alexander Fernando","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2025.24070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the e!ectiveness of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in the management of septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), with a focus on graft retention rates, functional outcomes, and the microbiological profile of infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024562550). PubMed, Cochrane, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect databases were searched for studies published before July 2024 using predefined Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to ACL-R infections and arthroscopic irrigation and debridement. Inclusion criteria followed the PICO framework: Population (patients with septic arthritis following ACL-R), intervention (arthroscopic irrigation and debridement), comparator (none), and outcomes (graft retention rate, Lysholm Knee Score, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKD] score, and Tegner Activity Scale [TAS], and microbiology data). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions. Meta-analyses were performed using R Studio, with results presented as pooled proportions or means with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies involving 333 patients were analyzed, with follow-up periods ranging from 18 days to 67 months. The pooled graft retention rate was 92% (95% CI [88-94%]), confirmed by proportional meta-analysis with low heterogeneity (I\"=0%, P=2.0948). Functional knee outcomes showed pooled mean scores of 82.41 for Lysholm (95% CI [78.15-86.66], I\"=87.3%-92.7%), 79.37 for IKDC (95% CI [74.00-84.75], I\"=68.3%-82.2%), and 5.08 for TAS (95% CI [4.87-5.30], I\"=0%-52.6%), indicating moderate to satisfactory recovery. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (42.34%) and Staphylococcus aureus (23.12%) were the most frequently isolated pathogens, with 9.91% of cases involving antibiotic-resistant strains, including MRSA (4.50%) and MR-CNS (5.41%). Cephalosporin or vancomycin was the most commonly administered first-line antibiotic, often combined with other agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that arthroscopic irrigation and debridement, combined with appropriate antibiotic therapy, are e!ective in managing septic arthritis following ACL-R, achieving a high graft retention rate of 92% and moderate to satisfactory functional outcomes. However, the presence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and challenges in returning to high-level sports highlight the importance of preventive measures to protect athlete performance and recovery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, Therapeutic Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"59 1","pages":"7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2025.24070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the e!ectiveness of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in the management of septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), with a focus on graft retention rates, functional outcomes, and the microbiological profile of infections.

Methods: This meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024562550). PubMed, Cochrane, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect databases were searched for studies published before July 2024 using predefined Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to ACL-R infections and arthroscopic irrigation and debridement. Inclusion criteria followed the PICO framework: Population (patients with septic arthritis following ACL-R), intervention (arthroscopic irrigation and debridement), comparator (none), and outcomes (graft retention rate, Lysholm Knee Score, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKD] score, and Tegner Activity Scale [TAS], and microbiology data). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions. Meta-analyses were performed using R Studio, with results presented as pooled proportions or means with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: A total of 20 studies involving 333 patients were analyzed, with follow-up periods ranging from 18 days to 67 months. The pooled graft retention rate was 92% (95% CI [88-94%]), confirmed by proportional meta-analysis with low heterogeneity (I"=0%, P=2.0948). Functional knee outcomes showed pooled mean scores of 82.41 for Lysholm (95% CI [78.15-86.66], I"=87.3%-92.7%), 79.37 for IKDC (95% CI [74.00-84.75], I"=68.3%-82.2%), and 5.08 for TAS (95% CI [4.87-5.30], I"=0%-52.6%), indicating moderate to satisfactory recovery. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (42.34%) and Staphylococcus aureus (23.12%) were the most frequently isolated pathogens, with 9.91% of cases involving antibiotic-resistant strains, including MRSA (4.50%) and MR-CNS (5.41%). Cephalosporin or vancomycin was the most commonly administered first-line antibiotic, often combined with other agents.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that arthroscopic irrigation and debridement, combined with appropriate antibiotic therapy, are e!ective in managing septic arthritis following ACL-R, achieving a high graft retention rate of 92% and moderate to satisfactory functional outcomes. However, the presence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and challenges in returning to high-level sports highlight the importance of preventive measures to protect athlete performance and recovery.

Level of evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

关节镜冲洗和清创治疗前交叉韧带重建后脓毒性关节炎的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:本荟萃分析旨在评价e!关节镜冲洗和清创在前交叉韧带重建(ACL-R)后脓毒性关节炎治疗中的有效性,重点关注移植物保留率、功能结局和感染的微生物特征。方法:本荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南,在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024562550)。检索PubMed、Cochrane、ProQuest和ScienceDirect数据库,检索2024年7月之前发表的与ACL-R感染、关节镜冲洗和清创相关的预先定义的医学主题词和关键词。纳入标准遵循PICO框架:人群(ACL-R后脓毒性关节炎患者)、干预(关节镜冲洗和清创)、比较物(无)和结果(移植物保留率、Lysholm膝关节评分、国际膝关节文献委员会[IKD]评分、Tegner活动量表[TAS]和微生物学数据)。偏倚风险采用Cochrane非随机干预研究偏倚风险评估。使用R Studio进行meta分析,结果以95%置信区间(95% CI)的合并比例或平均值表示。结果:共分析了20项研究,涉及333例患者,随访时间从18天到67个月不等。合并移植物保留率为92% (95% CI[88-94%]),经比例荟萃分析证实,异质性低(I′=0%,P=2.0948)。膝关节功能结果显示,Lysholm患者的合并平均评分为82.41分(95% CI [78.15-86.66], I′=87.3%-92.7%),IKDC患者的合并平均评分为79.37分(95% CI [74.00-84.75], I′=68.3%-82.2%),TAS患者的合并平均评分为5.08分(95% CI [4.87-5.30], I′=0%-52.6%),表明恢复中度至满意。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(42.34%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(23.12%)是最常见的分离病原体,其中9.91%的病例涉及耐药菌株,包括MRSA(4.50%)和MR-CNS(5.41%)。头孢菌素或万古霉素是最常用的一线抗生素,通常与其他药物联合使用。结论:关节镜下冲洗清创,配合适当的抗生素治疗,是有效的治疗方法。有效治疗ACL-R术后脓毒性关节炎,达到92%的高移植物保留率和中等到满意的功能结果。然而,抗生素耐药病原体的存在和重返高水平运动的挑战突出了预防措施的重要性,以保护运动员的表现和恢复。证据等级:IV级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信