Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Outcome with Laparoscopic Versus Endoscopic Bile Duct Exploration in Elderly Patients with Cholecystolithiasis and Choledocholithiasis.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yao Li, Tengxiao Wu, Jiayi Wang
{"title":"Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Outcome with Laparoscopic <em>Versus </em>Endoscopic Bile Duct Exploration in Elderly Patients with Cholecystolithiasis and Choledocholithiasis.","authors":"Yao Li, Tengxiao Wu, Jiayi Wang","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.05.562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis and its effects on liver function and stress response.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Comparative observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Anyang City People's Hospital, Xinxiang Medical College, Anyang, China, from August 2021 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Eighty-six elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were divided into two distinct groups. The control group (n = 43) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The observation group (n = 43) received LC along with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes, complication rates, the frequency of residual stones, and liver function markers, including total bilirubin (TBil), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was made. Furthermore, inflammatory markers such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as stress markers including cortisol and epinephrine were also evaluated. Also, the quality of life both before and after surgery was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group had better perioperative outcomes with a lower complication rate (4.65% vs. 20.93% in controls, p <0.05). Both groups showed significant post-surgical improvements in liver function markers (TBil, AST, ALT, p <0.05), with no significant inter-group differences. Postoperative inflammatory (TNF-α, CRP, IL-6) and stress markers (cortisol, epinephrine) increased significantly (p <0.05), with trends favouring lower levels in the observation group. Quality of life scores significantly improved in both groups one month post-surgery (p <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LC combined with LCBDE is as effective as ERCP combined with LC for removing stones and improving liver function and quality of life in elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. However, the LC combined with the laparoscopic common bile duct exploration approach has fewer complications, reduces inflammation and stress responses, and supports better overall recovery, making it the preferred option for this patient population.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Gallstone, Choledocholithiasis, Old age, Minimally invasive surgery, Liver function, Stress response.</p>","PeriodicalId":54905,"journal":{"name":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","volume":"35 5","pages":"562-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.05.562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis and its effects on liver function and stress response.

Study design: Comparative observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Anyang City People's Hospital, Xinxiang Medical College, Anyang, China, from August 2021 to 2023.

Methodology: Eighty-six elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were divided into two distinct groups. The control group (n = 43) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The observation group (n = 43) received LC along with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes, complication rates, the frequency of residual stones, and liver function markers, including total bilirubin (TBil), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was made. Furthermore, inflammatory markers such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as stress markers including cortisol and epinephrine were also evaluated. Also, the quality of life both before and after surgery was assessed.

Results: The observation group had better perioperative outcomes with a lower complication rate (4.65% vs. 20.93% in controls, p <0.05). Both groups showed significant post-surgical improvements in liver function markers (TBil, AST, ALT, p <0.05), with no significant inter-group differences. Postoperative inflammatory (TNF-α, CRP, IL-6) and stress markers (cortisol, epinephrine) increased significantly (p <0.05), with trends favouring lower levels in the observation group. Quality of life scores significantly improved in both groups one month post-surgery (p <0.05).

Conclusion: LC combined with LCBDE is as effective as ERCP combined with LC for removing stones and improving liver function and quality of life in elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. However, the LC combined with the laparoscopic common bile duct exploration approach has fewer complications, reduces inflammation and stress responses, and supports better overall recovery, making it the preferred option for this patient population.

Key words: Gallstone, Choledocholithiasis, Old age, Minimally invasive surgery, Liver function, Stress response.

老年胆囊结石和胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术与内镜胆管探查的疗效比较。
目的:评价微创手术治疗老年胆囊结石、胆总管结石的疗效、安全性及其对肝功能和应激反应的影响。研究设计:比较观察性研究。研究地点和时间:中国安阳市新乡医学院安阳市人民医院肝胆外科,2021年8月- 2023年8月。方法:将86例老年胆囊结石和胆总管结石患者分为两组。对照组(n = 43)行内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。观察组(43例)行LC联合腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)。比较两组围手术期预后、并发症发生率、结石残留频率及肝功能指标(总胆红素(TBil)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT))。此外,炎症标志物如肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)、c反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞介素-6 (IL-6),以及应激标志物包括皮质醇和肾上腺素也进行了评估。同时,对手术前后的生活质量进行了评估。结果:观察组围手术期预后较好,并发症发生率较低(对照组为20.93%,对照组为4.65%)。结论:LC联合LCBDE与ERCP联合LC对老年胆囊结石、胆总管结石患者结石清除、肝功能改善及生活质量的效果相同。然而,LC联合腹腔镜胆总管探查入路并发症少,炎症和应激反应减少,整体恢复更好,是这类患者的首选。关键词:胆结石,胆总管结石,老年,微创手术,肝功能,应激反应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
453
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (JCPSP), is the prestigious, peer reviewed monthly biomedical journal of the country published regularly since 1991. Established with the primary aim of promotion and dissemination of medical research and contributed by scholars of biomedical sciences from Pakistan and abroad, it carries original research papers, , case reports, review articles, articles on medical education, commentaries, short communication, new technology, editorials and letters to the editor. It covers the core biomedical health science subjects, basic medical sciences and emerging community problems, prepared in accordance with the “Uniform requirements for submission to bio-medical journals” laid down by International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (ICMJE). All publications of JCPSP are peer reviewed by subject specialists from Pakistan and locally and abroad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信