Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Gut Microbiome Profiles: A Comparative Metagenomic Study.

IF 6.2 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s43657-025-00232-x
Yanni Pu, Xiaofeng Zhou, Hao Cai, Tao Lou, Chenglin Liu, Mengmeng Kong, Zhonghan Sun, Yanren Wang, Ruyi Zhang, Yuxuan Zhu, Lin Ye, Yuanting Zheng, Baoli Zhu, Zhexue Quan, Guoping Zhao, Yan Zheng
{"title":"Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Gut Microbiome Profiles: A Comparative Metagenomic Study.","authors":"Yanni Pu, Xiaofeng Zhou, Hao Cai, Tao Lou, Chenglin Liu, Mengmeng Kong, Zhonghan Sun, Yanren Wang, Ruyi Zhang, Yuxuan Zhu, Lin Ye, Yuanting Zheng, Baoli Zhu, Zhexue Quan, Guoping Zhao, Yan Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s43657-025-00232-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In gut microbial research, DNA extraction remarkably influences study outcomes and biological interpretations. Rapid advancements in the research scale and technological upgrades necessitate evaluating new methods to ensure reliability and precision in microbial community profiling. We systematically evaluated the performance of eight recent and commonly used extraction methods using a microbial mock community (MMC) and fecal samples from two healthy volunteers, incorporating bacterial, archaeal, and fungal constituents. Performance metrics included nucleic acid assessment, microbial profile assessment, and scalability for large-scale studies, leveraging shotgun metagenomics for in-depth analysis. Despite variations in DNA quantity and quality, all methods yielded sufficient DNA for shotgun metagenomic sequencing. In the MMC microbial profile assessment, the QIAamp PowerFecal pro Kit (PF) and DNeasy PowerSoil HTP kit (PS) methods exhibited higher similarity with the theoretical composition and lower variability across technical replicates compared to other methods. For fecal samples, the extraction method accounted for 21.4% of the overall microbiome variation and significantly affected the abundances of 32% of detected microbial species. Methods using mechanical lysis with small beads, such as PF and PS, demonstrated better efficiency, indicated by increased microbial diversity in extracting DNA from Gram-positive bacteria. Furthermore, the PF and PS methods are notably simple to execute and automation-friendly, though relatively costly. Our study underscores the importance of maintaining consistency in DNA extraction methods for reliable comparative metagenomic analyses. We recommend PF and PS methods as optimal for expansive gut metagenomic research, emphasizing the critical role of mechanical lysis in DNA extraction.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43657-025-00232-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":74435,"journal":{"name":"Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland)","volume":"5 1","pages":"76-90"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43657-025-00232-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In gut microbial research, DNA extraction remarkably influences study outcomes and biological interpretations. Rapid advancements in the research scale and technological upgrades necessitate evaluating new methods to ensure reliability and precision in microbial community profiling. We systematically evaluated the performance of eight recent and commonly used extraction methods using a microbial mock community (MMC) and fecal samples from two healthy volunteers, incorporating bacterial, archaeal, and fungal constituents. Performance metrics included nucleic acid assessment, microbial profile assessment, and scalability for large-scale studies, leveraging shotgun metagenomics for in-depth analysis. Despite variations in DNA quantity and quality, all methods yielded sufficient DNA for shotgun metagenomic sequencing. In the MMC microbial profile assessment, the QIAamp PowerFecal pro Kit (PF) and DNeasy PowerSoil HTP kit (PS) methods exhibited higher similarity with the theoretical composition and lower variability across technical replicates compared to other methods. For fecal samples, the extraction method accounted for 21.4% of the overall microbiome variation and significantly affected the abundances of 32% of detected microbial species. Methods using mechanical lysis with small beads, such as PF and PS, demonstrated better efficiency, indicated by increased microbial diversity in extracting DNA from Gram-positive bacteria. Furthermore, the PF and PS methods are notably simple to execute and automation-friendly, though relatively costly. Our study underscores the importance of maintaining consistency in DNA extraction methods for reliable comparative metagenomic analyses. We recommend PF and PS methods as optimal for expansive gut metagenomic research, emphasizing the critical role of mechanical lysis in DNA extraction.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43657-025-00232-x.

DNA提取方法对肠道微生物组的影响:一项比较宏基因组研究。
在肠道微生物研究中,DNA提取显著影响研究结果和生物学解释。研究规模的快速发展和技术的升级需要评估新的方法,以确保微生物群落分析的可靠性和准确性。我们使用微生物模拟群落(MMC)和两名健康志愿者的粪便样本,包括细菌、古细菌和真菌成分,系统地评估了八种最近和常用的提取方法的性能。性能指标包括核酸评估、微生物谱评估和大规模研究的可扩展性,利用霰弹枪宏基因组学进行深入分析。尽管DNA的数量和质量存在差异,但所有方法都能产生足够的DNA进行散弹枪宏基因组测序。在MMC微生物谱评估中,QIAamp PowerFecal pro Kit (PF)和dnasy PowerSoil HTP Kit (PS)方法与其他方法相比,具有较高的理论组成相似性和较低的技术重复变变性。对于粪便样品,提取方法占总体微生物组变异的21.4%,显著影响32%的检测微生物物种的丰度。采用小颗粒机械裂解的方法,如PF和PS,效率更高,表明从革兰氏阳性菌中提取DNA的微生物多样性增加。此外,PF和PS方法执行起来非常简单,而且自动化友好,尽管成本相对较高。我们的研究强调了保持DNA提取方法一致性对可靠的比较宏基因组分析的重要性。我们推荐PF和PS方法作为扩展肠道宏基因组研究的最佳方法,强调机械裂解在DNA提取中的关键作用。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址为10.1007/s43657-025-00232-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信