Cognitive Assessment of Dementia in Incarcerated Populations: The Utility of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition and the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination.

Ella L Modini, Michael D Trood, Rachael Fullam, Stephen R Macfarlane, Margaret Nixon
{"title":"Cognitive Assessment of Dementia in Incarcerated Populations: The Utility of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition and the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination.","authors":"Ella L Modini, Michael D Trood, Rachael Fullam, Stephen R Macfarlane, Margaret Nixon","doi":"10.1089/jchc.24.08.0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are many reasons why people experiencing incarceration may be predisposed to developing dementia. Dementia assessment in prisons is challenging. This study assessed the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition (ACE-III) and the Mini Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) as potential tools for use in incarcerated populations, with a view to detecting suspected dementia. The ACE-III was administered to 114 males more than 50 years of age without a diagnosis of dementia across three prison sites in Victoria, Australia, in 2022. A psychogeriatrician reviewed data for atypical response patterns to determine whether individuals' profiles were suggestive of dementia. The M-ACE was scored retrospectively from the ACE-III. Scores were compared with the psychogeriatrician's review to determine concordance rates. Both tools acceptably discriminated males who indicated dementia from those without (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.77, [0.65, 0.98]; AUC = 0.77, [0.60, 0.93], respectively). Both tools produced high negative predictive values (0.96 and 0.97). Both the ACE-III and M-ACE demonstrated utility for use in this cohort. The M-ACE may be an useful tool for screening out individuals who do not have dementia, while the ACE-III provides a comprehensive cognitive profile as a basis to assess for dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":73693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"176-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jchc.24.08.0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are many reasons why people experiencing incarceration may be predisposed to developing dementia. Dementia assessment in prisons is challenging. This study assessed the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition (ACE-III) and the Mini Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) as potential tools for use in incarcerated populations, with a view to detecting suspected dementia. The ACE-III was administered to 114 males more than 50 years of age without a diagnosis of dementia across three prison sites in Victoria, Australia, in 2022. A psychogeriatrician reviewed data for atypical response patterns to determine whether individuals' profiles were suggestive of dementia. The M-ACE was scored retrospectively from the ACE-III. Scores were compared with the psychogeriatrician's review to determine concordance rates. Both tools acceptably discriminated males who indicated dementia from those without (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.77, [0.65, 0.98]; AUC = 0.77, [0.60, 0.93], respectively). Both tools produced high negative predictive values (0.96 and 0.97). Both the ACE-III and M-ACE demonstrated utility for use in this cohort. The M-ACE may be an useful tool for screening out individuals who do not have dementia, while the ACE-III provides a comprehensive cognitive profile as a basis to assess for dementia.

监禁人群中痴呆症的认知评估:阿登布鲁克认知检查第三版和迷你阿登布鲁克认知检查的效用。
有很多原因可以解释为什么被监禁的人更容易患上痴呆症。监狱中的痴呆症评估具有挑战性。本研究评估了阿登布鲁克认知检查第三版(ACE-III)和迷你阿登布鲁克认知检查(M-ACE)作为在监禁人群中使用的潜在工具,以检测疑似痴呆。研究人员于2022年在澳大利亚维多利亚州的三个监狱对114名50岁以上的男性进行了ACE-III测试,这些男性没有被诊断出患有痴呆症。一位老年精神病学专家回顾了非典型反应模式的数据,以确定个体的概况是否暗示着痴呆症。M-ACE采用ACE-III回顾性评分。将得分与老年心理医生的评价进行比较,以确定一致性率。这两种工具都可以接受地区分患有痴呆症的男性和没有痴呆症的男性(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.77, [0.65, 0.98];AUC分别= 0.77,[0.60,0.93])。两种工具都产生了很高的负预测值(0.96和0.97)。ACE-III和M-ACE都证明了在该队列中的实用性。M-ACE可能是筛选无痴呆个体的有用工具,而ACE-III提供了全面的认知概况,作为评估痴呆的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信