#GenderAffirmingHormoneTherapy and Health Information on TikTok: Thematic Content Analysis.

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2025-04-29 DOI:10.2196/66845
Julia Rose Beatini, Nora Yanyi Sun, Julianna K Coleman, Maetal E Haas-Kogan, Andrea Pelletier, Deborah Bartz, Alex Sogomon Keuroghlian
{"title":"#GenderAffirmingHormoneTherapy and Health Information on TikTok: Thematic Content Analysis.","authors":"Julia Rose Beatini, Nora Yanyi Sun, Julianna K Coleman, Maetal E Haas-Kogan, Andrea Pelletier, Deborah Bartz, Alex Sogomon Keuroghlian","doi":"10.2196/66845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transgender and gender diverse people often turn to online platforms for information and support regarding gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT); however, analysis of this social media content remains scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We characterized GAHT-related videos on TikTok to highlight the implications relevant to GAHT prescribers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a web scraper to identify TikTok videos posted under the hashtags #genderaffirminghormonetherapy and #genderaffirminghormones as of November 2023. We identified recurrent themes via qualitative content analysis and assessed health education videos with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V) scale and a modified Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 69 videos extracted, 71% (49/69) were created by GAHT users, 24.6% (17/69) were created by health care workers, and 21.7% (15/69) were created to provide health education. Themes included physical changes on testosterone, GAHT access, and combating misinformation and stigma surrounding GAHT. Health education videos scored highly on PEMAT-A/V items assessing understandability (mean 88.3%, SD 11.3%) and lower on actionability (mean 60.0%, SD 45.8%). On the CRAAP test, videos scored highly on the relevance, authority, and purpose domains but lower on the currency and accuracy domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discussions of GAHT on TikTok build community among transgender and gender diverse users, provide a platform for digital activism and resistance against legislation that limits GAHT access, and foster patient-provider dialogue. Educational videos are highly understandable and are created by reliable sources, but they vary in terms of currency and quality of supporting evidence, and they lack in actionability.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"5 ","pages":"e66845"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transgender and gender diverse people often turn to online platforms for information and support regarding gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT); however, analysis of this social media content remains scarce.

Objective: We characterized GAHT-related videos on TikTok to highlight the implications relevant to GAHT prescribers.

Methods: We used a web scraper to identify TikTok videos posted under the hashtags #genderaffirminghormonetherapy and #genderaffirminghormones as of November 2023. We identified recurrent themes via qualitative content analysis and assessed health education videos with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V) scale and a modified Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) test.

Results: Out of 69 videos extracted, 71% (49/69) were created by GAHT users, 24.6% (17/69) were created by health care workers, and 21.7% (15/69) were created to provide health education. Themes included physical changes on testosterone, GAHT access, and combating misinformation and stigma surrounding GAHT. Health education videos scored highly on PEMAT-A/V items assessing understandability (mean 88.3%, SD 11.3%) and lower on actionability (mean 60.0%, SD 45.8%). On the CRAAP test, videos scored highly on the relevance, authority, and purpose domains but lower on the currency and accuracy domains.

Conclusions: Discussions of GAHT on TikTok build community among transgender and gender diverse users, provide a platform for digital activism and resistance against legislation that limits GAHT access, and foster patient-provider dialogue. Educational videos are highly understandable and are created by reliable sources, but they vary in terms of currency and quality of supporting evidence, and they lack in actionability.

#性别肯定荷尔蒙疗法和抖音健康信息:主题内容分析。
背景:变性人和性别多样化的人经常转向在线平台寻求关于性别确认激素治疗(GAHT)的信息和支持;然而,对这种社交媒体内容的分析仍然很少。目的:我们描述了TikTok上与GAHT相关的视频,以突出与GAHT处方者相关的影响。方法:我们使用网络刮板识别截至2023年11月在#性别肯定激素疗法和#性别肯定激素标签下发布的TikTok视频。我们通过定性内容分析确定了反复出现的主题,并使用患者教育材料视听材料评估工具(PEMAT-A/V)量表和改进的流通、相关性、权威、准确性和目的(CRAAP)测试评估健康教育视频。结果:在提取的69个视频中,71%(49/69)为GAHT用户制作,24.6%(17/69)为卫生工作者制作,21.7%(15/69)为健康教育制作。主题包括睾酮的生理变化,GAHT的获取,以及与围绕GAHT的错误信息和污名作斗争。健康教育视频在可理解性方面得分较高(平均88.3%,标准差11.3%),在可操作性方面得分较低(平均60.0%,标准差45.8%)。在CRAAP测试中,视频在相关性、权威性和目的性方面得分很高,但在实用性和准确性方面得分较低。结论:TikTok上关于GAHT的讨论建立了跨性别和性别多样化用户之间的社区,为数字激进主义和抵制限制GAHT获取的立法提供了一个平台,并促进了患者与提供者的对话。教育视频是非常容易理解的,并且是由可靠的来源创建的,但它们在货币和支持证据的质量方面各不相同,并且缺乏可操作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信