Ivana Vasic, Kian C Banks, Julia Wei, Leyda Marrero Morales, Zeuz A Islas, Nathan J Alcasid, Cynthia Susai, Angela Sun, Katemanee Burapachaisri, Ashish R Patel, Simon K Ashiku, Jeffrey B Velotta
{"title":"Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Lung Cancer Surgery Outcomes in the USA.","authors":"Ivana Vasic, Kian C Banks, Julia Wei, Leyda Marrero Morales, Zeuz A Islas, Nathan J Alcasid, Cynthia Susai, Angela Sun, Katemanee Burapachaisri, Ashish R Patel, Simon K Ashiku, Jeffrey B Velotta","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia6020018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Sparse data exist identifying racial/ethnic outcome disparities among patients with lung cancer, specifically regarding healthcare utilization patterns, such as emergency department visits and outpatient follow-ups. We aimed to utilize our large, multicenter, and ethnically diverse integrated health system to assess for such disparities among patients undergoing pulmonary resections for lung cancer. <b>Methods</b>: The cohort comprised all patients undergoing pulmonary resections for lung cancer at our integrated health system from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020. Outcomes including the length of stay (LOS), 30-day return to the emergency department (30d-ED), 30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day outpatient appointments, and 30- and 90-day overall mortality were compared by race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic and linear models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, procedure approach, neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), cancer stage, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, and insurance. <b>Results</b>: Of the 645 included patients, non-Hispanic White patients tended to be older and live in the least deprived neighborhoods. Among each race/ethnicity, the percentage of patients insured by Medicaid was highest among Asian patients. On bivariate analysis, only the outcome of surgical outpatient appointments within 30 days had differing distributions by race/ethnicity with no other significant associations between race/ethnicity and other outcomes; however, multivariable analysis showed Asian patients having lower odds of 30d-ED (adjusted odds ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.27-0.98) while those with Medicaid insurance had higher odds of 30d-ED (adjusted odds ratio 3.29; 95% CI 1.26-8.59). <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite parity across clinical outcomes, some patient encounter-related differences still exist within our system. To better understand racial/ethnic disparities in care, systems must track such disparities in addition to clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6020018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Sparse data exist identifying racial/ethnic outcome disparities among patients with lung cancer, specifically regarding healthcare utilization patterns, such as emergency department visits and outpatient follow-ups. We aimed to utilize our large, multicenter, and ethnically diverse integrated health system to assess for such disparities among patients undergoing pulmonary resections for lung cancer. Methods: The cohort comprised all patients undergoing pulmonary resections for lung cancer at our integrated health system from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020. Outcomes including the length of stay (LOS), 30-day return to the emergency department (30d-ED), 30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day outpatient appointments, and 30- and 90-day overall mortality were compared by race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic and linear models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, procedure approach, neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), cancer stage, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, and insurance. Results: Of the 645 included patients, non-Hispanic White patients tended to be older and live in the least deprived neighborhoods. Among each race/ethnicity, the percentage of patients insured by Medicaid was highest among Asian patients. On bivariate analysis, only the outcome of surgical outpatient appointments within 30 days had differing distributions by race/ethnicity with no other significant associations between race/ethnicity and other outcomes; however, multivariable analysis showed Asian patients having lower odds of 30d-ED (adjusted odds ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.27-0.98) while those with Medicaid insurance had higher odds of 30d-ED (adjusted odds ratio 3.29; 95% CI 1.26-8.59). Conclusions: Despite parity across clinical outcomes, some patient encounter-related differences still exist within our system. To better understand racial/ethnic disparities in care, systems must track such disparities in addition to clinical outcomes.
背景/目的:现有的关于肺癌患者的种族/民族结局差异的数据很少,特别是关于医疗保健利用模式,如急诊科就诊和门诊随访。我们的目的是利用我们的大型、多中心、种族多样化的综合卫生系统来评估肺癌肺切除术患者之间的这种差异。方法:该队列包括2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日在综合卫生系统接受肺癌肺切除术的所有患者。结果包括住院时间(LOS), 30天返回急诊科(30d-ED), 30天再入院,30天和90天门诊预约,以及30天和90天总死亡率按种族/民族进行比较。多变量logistic和线性模型校正了年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、Charlson合并症指数评分、手术方式、邻里剥夺指数(NDI)、癌症分期、接受辅助化疗和保险。结果:在纳入的645名患者中,非西班牙裔白人患者往往年龄较大,生活在最贫困的社区。在每个种族/族裔中,获得医疗补助的患者比例在亚洲患者中最高。在双变量分析中,只有30天内外科门诊预约的结果在种族/民族之间有不同的分布,种族/民族与其他结果之间没有其他显著关联;然而,多变量分析显示,亚洲患者发生30d-ED的几率较低(校正优势比0.51;95% CI 0.27-0.98),而那些有医疗补助保险的人30d-ED的几率更高(调整后的优势比3.29;95% ci 1.26-8.59)。结论:尽管临床结果相同,但在我们的系统中仍然存在一些与患者遭遇相关的差异。为了更好地了解护理中的种族/民族差异,除了临床结果之外,系统还必须跟踪这种差异。