Complete closure utilizing titanium clips minimizes delayed postpolypectomy bleeding after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection: a retrospective analysis.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848251332836
Wei-Feng Li, Bing Lai, Li Lv, Xi-Qiu Yu, Jia-Le Fan, Zhi-Wei Zhou, Jing-Wen Xu, Ruo-Yu Gao, Ze-Ming Chen, Bi-Xia Xu
{"title":"Complete closure utilizing titanium clips minimizes delayed postpolypectomy bleeding after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Wei-Feng Li, Bing Lai, Li Lv, Xi-Qiu Yu, Jia-Le Fan, Zhi-Wei Zhou, Jing-Wen Xu, Ruo-Yu Gao, Ze-Ming Chen, Bi-Xia Xu","doi":"10.1177/17562848251332836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) constitutes one of the most prevalent complications following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for colonic polyps and can be life-threatening. It has been affirmed that prophylactic clip closure can effectively diminish the risk of DPPB for colonic polyps exceeding 20 mm in the right half of the colon after EMR. Nevertheless, there remains controversy regarding whether prophylactic clip closure can prevent postoperative bleeding for polyps measuring less than 20 mm. To date, no literature has reported whether the complete closure of titanium clips following EMR for colorectal polyps ⩽20 mm can effectively prevent delayed bleeding.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine whether complete closure can prevent delayed postoperative bleeding and analyze the related factors that might influence delayed postoperative bleeding.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this retrospective study, a total of 1259 colorectal polyps detected in 1025 patients between January 2020 and October 2024 were evaluated for EMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Univariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess patient-related, polyp-related, and procedure-related factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DPPB was observed in 37 patients, representing an incidence rate of 3.6%. Logistic regression analysis indicated that male (odds ratio, 3.870; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.594-9.396; <i>p</i> = 0.003), presence of large polyps (OR, 1.158; 95% CI, 1.044-1.285; <i>p</i> = 0.006), and partial closure (OR, 5.447; 95% CI, 2.250-13.186; <i>p</i> < 0.001) are significant risk factors for the development of DPPB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male, polyp size, and partial closure have been identified as potential risk factors for the development of DPPB. While gender and polyp size are immutable factors, partial closure is particularly associated with an increased risk of DPPB. Therefore, it is imperative to ensure complete closure of the wound following EMR to minimize the occurrence of DPPB.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562848251332836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251332836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) constitutes one of the most prevalent complications following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for colonic polyps and can be life-threatening. It has been affirmed that prophylactic clip closure can effectively diminish the risk of DPPB for colonic polyps exceeding 20 mm in the right half of the colon after EMR. Nevertheless, there remains controversy regarding whether prophylactic clip closure can prevent postoperative bleeding for polyps measuring less than 20 mm. To date, no literature has reported whether the complete closure of titanium clips following EMR for colorectal polyps ⩽20 mm can effectively prevent delayed bleeding.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine whether complete closure can prevent delayed postoperative bleeding and analyze the related factors that might influence delayed postoperative bleeding.

Design: In this retrospective study, a total of 1259 colorectal polyps detected in 1025 patients between January 2020 and October 2024 were evaluated for EMR.

Methods: Univariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess patient-related, polyp-related, and procedure-related factors.

Results: DPPB was observed in 37 patients, representing an incidence rate of 3.6%. Logistic regression analysis indicated that male (odds ratio, 3.870; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.594-9.396; p = 0.003), presence of large polyps (OR, 1.158; 95% CI, 1.044-1.285; p = 0.006), and partial closure (OR, 5.447; 95% CI, 2.250-13.186; p < 0.001) are significant risk factors for the development of DPPB.

Conclusion: Male, polyp size, and partial closure have been identified as potential risk factors for the development of DPPB. While gender and polyp size are immutable factors, partial closure is particularly associated with an increased risk of DPPB. Therefore, it is imperative to ensure complete closure of the wound following EMR to minimize the occurrence of DPPB.

使用钛夹完全闭合可最大限度地减少结肠内镜下粘膜切除术后延迟息肉切除术后出血:回顾性分析。
背景:息肉切除术后迟发性出血(DPPB)是内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)治疗结肠息肉后最常见的并发症之一,可能危及生命。已有研究证实,对于EMR后右半结肠超过20mm的结肠息肉,预防性夹封可有效降低DPPB的发生风险。然而,对于小于20mm的息肉是否能够预防术后出血,目前仍存在争议。到目前为止,还没有文献报道在EMR治疗结肠直肠息肉后完全闭合钛夹是否能有效预防延迟性出血。目的:本研究的目的是确定完全闭合是否可以预防术后延迟性出血,并分析可能影响术后延迟性出血的相关因素。设计:在这项回顾性研究中,对2020年1月至2024年10月期间1025例患者中检测到的1259例结直肠息肉进行EMR评估。方法:进行单因素和逻辑回归分析,评估患者相关因素、息肉相关因素和手术相关因素。结果:37例患者出现DPPB,发生率为3.6%。Logistic回归分析显示,男性(优势比,3.870;95%置信区间(CI), 1.594-9.396;p = 0.003),存在大息肉(OR, 1.158;95% ci, 1.044-1.285;p = 0.006),部分闭合(OR, 5.447;95% ci, 2.250-13.186;结论:男性、息肉大小和部分闭合已被确定为DPPB发展的潜在危险因素。虽然性别和息肉大小是不可改变的因素,但部分闭合与DPPB风险增加尤其相关。因此,必须确保EMR后伤口完全闭合,以尽量减少DPPB的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信