Laparoscopic pectopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP): how, why, when: a narrative review of the literature.

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Anna Pitsillidi, Athanasios Protopapas, Fani Gkrozou, Angelos Daniilidis
{"title":"Laparoscopic pectopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP): how, why, when: a narrative review of the literature.","authors":"Anna Pitsillidi, Athanasios Protopapas, Fani Gkrozou, Angelos Daniilidis","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.2024.13381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common gynaecological condition that can have an adverse impact on women's quality of life. Apical prolapse refers to the descending of the vaginal apex, uterus or cervix. Nowadays, laparoscopic sacropexy (LS) is the gold standard surgical method for the treatment of apical prolapse. However, defecation and urinary problems are often detected in patients who underwent LS. Laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) is a newer procedure for apical prolapse correction that uses the iliopectineal ligaments as fixation point for the surgical mesh.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the current evidence of the effectiveness and safety of LP and compare outcomes with other commonly used techniques for apical prolapse treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The search was restricted to humans, female patients and currently used surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The current recommendations from leading global scientific associations and prevailing trends in accepted clinical protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LP was found to have shorter learning curve and operating times, better improvement in quality of life scores including sexual function and low complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LP appears to be a viable alternative to LS. However, further prospective, comparative studies are necessary to evaluate its long-term effectiveness and morbidity.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>This review summarises the evidence and current role of LP in the treatment of POP.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"17 1","pages":"30-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.2024.13381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common gynaecological condition that can have an adverse impact on women's quality of life. Apical prolapse refers to the descending of the vaginal apex, uterus or cervix. Nowadays, laparoscopic sacropexy (LS) is the gold standard surgical method for the treatment of apical prolapse. However, defecation and urinary problems are often detected in patients who underwent LS. Laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) is a newer procedure for apical prolapse correction that uses the iliopectineal ligaments as fixation point for the surgical mesh.

Objectives: To review the current evidence of the effectiveness and safety of LP and compare outcomes with other commonly used techniques for apical prolapse treatment.

Methods: A literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The search was restricted to humans, female patients and currently used surgical procedures.

Main outcome measures: The current recommendations from leading global scientific associations and prevailing trends in accepted clinical protocols.

Results: LP was found to have shorter learning curve and operating times, better improvement in quality of life scores including sexual function and low complication rates.

Conclusions: LP appears to be a viable alternative to LS. However, further prospective, comparative studies are necessary to evaluate its long-term effectiveness and morbidity.

What is new?: This review summarises the evidence and current role of LP in the treatment of POP.

腹腔镜胸固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP):如何,为什么,何时:文献的叙述性回顾。
背景:盆腔器官脱垂(POP)是一种常见的妇科疾病,可对妇女的生活质量产生不利影响。根尖脱垂是指阴道顶点、子宫或子宫颈的下降。目前,腹腔镜骶管切除术(LS)是治疗根尖脱垂的金标准手术方法。然而,在LS患者中经常发现排便和泌尿系统问题。腹腔镜胸固定术(LP)是一种较新的根尖脱垂矫正方法,它使用髂耻韧带作为手术补片的固定点。目的:回顾LP的有效性和安全性的现有证据,并与其他常用的根尖脱垂治疗技术的结果进行比较。方法:在MEDLINE、PubMed和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中进行文献检索。这项研究仅限于人类、女性患者和目前使用的外科手术。主要结果测量:目前全球主要科学协会的建议和公认临床方案的流行趋势。结果:LP患者学习曲线短,手术时间短,性功能等生活质量评分改善明显,并发症发生率低。结论:LP似乎是一个可行的替代LS。然而,需要进一步的前瞻性比较研究来评估其长期有效性和发病率。有什么新鲜事吗?本文综述了LP治疗POP的证据和目前的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信