Attenuation Coefficient for Hepatic Steatosis Using a Single Ultrasound System: Associations of Measurement Parameters With Interoperator Agreement and Diagnostic Performance.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
American Journal of Roentgenology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.2214/AJR.25.32746
Giovanna Ferraioli, Davide Roccarina, Richard G Barr
{"title":"Attenuation Coefficient for Hepatic Steatosis Using a Single Ultrasound System: Associations of Measurement Parameters With Interoperator Agreement and Diagnostic Performance.","authors":"Giovanna Ferraioli, Davide Roccarina, Richard G Barr","doi":"10.2214/AJR.25.32746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND</b>. Clinical adoption of ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) measurements has been hindered by lack of a uniform measurement protocol and a range of factors that may cause variability. <b>OBJECTIVE</b>. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations of ROI depth, ROI size, and confidence map threshold with interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance of ultrasound AC measurements in detecting and grading hepatic steatosis using MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as the reference standard. <b>METHODS</b>. This prospective study enrolled adults with known steatosis or at risk for steatosis from October 2023 to August 2024. One of two operators obtained videos of AC acquisitions using a single ultrasound unit. Both operators independently reviewed all videos and placed circular ROIs to obtain AC measurements for all 24 possible combinations of four ROI depths (2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 4.0 cm from liver capsule to ROI outer edge), three ROI sizes (3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 cm), and two confidence map thresholds (20% and 40%). Participants underwent MRI PDFF measurement as a reference. <b>RESULTS</b>. The analysis included 101 participants (mean age, 54.5 ± 12.1 [SD] years; 62 women, 39 men). Interoperator agreement was excellent for all combinations (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.92-0.98). AC measurements showed strongest correlations (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, 0.81 and 0.80 for operators 1 and 2, respectively) with MRI PDFF at an ROI depth of 4.0 cm. The optimal combination considering correlations with MRI PDFF and AUC across steatosis grades included a depth of 4.0 cm, size of 4.0 cm, and threshold of 40%. This combination had an AUC for detecting steatosis with grade of greater than 0, greater than 1, and greater than 2 for operator 1 of 0.93, 0.88, and 0.81, respectively, and for operator 2 of 0.92, 0.86, and 0.81, respectively. However, accuracy for detecting steatosis (grade > 0) was highest for the combination of depth of 3.0 cm, size of 4.0 cm, and threshold of 40% (operator 1, 90.1%; operator 2, 82.2%). <b>CONCLUSION</b>. AC measurements showed excellent interoperator agreement across parameter combinations. Correlations with MRI PDFF were strongest at a depth of 4.0 cm. Combinations yielding highest diagnostic performance were identified. <b>CLINICAL IMPACT</b>. These results will help determine a standardized optimal protocol for ultrasound AC measurements, facilitating clinical adoption for liver fat quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":" ","pages":"e2532746"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.25.32746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Clinical adoption of ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) measurements has been hindered by lack of a uniform measurement protocol and a range of factors that may cause variability. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations of ROI depth, ROI size, and confidence map threshold with interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance of ultrasound AC measurements in detecting and grading hepatic steatosis using MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as the reference standard. METHODS. This prospective study enrolled adults with known steatosis or at risk for steatosis from October 2023 to August 2024. One of two operators obtained videos of AC acquisitions using a single ultrasound unit. Both operators independently reviewed all videos and placed circular ROIs to obtain AC measurements for all 24 possible combinations of four ROI depths (2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 4.0 cm from liver capsule to ROI outer edge), three ROI sizes (3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 cm), and two confidence map thresholds (20% and 40%). Participants underwent MRI PDFF measurement as a reference. RESULTS. The analysis included 101 participants (mean age, 54.5 ± 12.1 [SD] years; 62 women, 39 men). Interoperator agreement was excellent for all combinations (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.92-0.98). AC measurements showed strongest correlations (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, 0.81 and 0.80 for operators 1 and 2, respectively) with MRI PDFF at an ROI depth of 4.0 cm. The optimal combination considering correlations with MRI PDFF and AUC across steatosis grades included a depth of 4.0 cm, size of 4.0 cm, and threshold of 40%. This combination had an AUC for detecting steatosis with grade of greater than 0, greater than 1, and greater than 2 for operator 1 of 0.93, 0.88, and 0.81, respectively, and for operator 2 of 0.92, 0.86, and 0.81, respectively. However, accuracy for detecting steatosis (grade > 0) was highest for the combination of depth of 3.0 cm, size of 4.0 cm, and threshold of 40% (operator 1, 90.1%; operator 2, 82.2%). CONCLUSION. AC measurements showed excellent interoperator agreement across parameter combinations. Correlations with MRI PDFF were strongest at a depth of 4.0 cm. Combinations yielding highest diagnostic performance were identified. CLINICAL IMPACT. These results will help determine a standardized optimal protocol for ultrasound AC measurements, facilitating clinical adoption for liver fat quantification.

使用单一超声系统肝脂肪变性的衰减系数:测量参数与操作员协议和诊断性能的关联。
背景:由于缺乏统一的测量方案和一系列可能导致变异的因素,临床采用超声衰减系数(AC)测量一直受到阻碍。目的:以MRI质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)为参考标准,评估ROI深度、ROI大小和置信度阈值与观察者间一致性的关系,以及超声AC测量在肝脏脂肪变性检测和分级中的诊断性能。方法:这项前瞻性研究从2023年10月至2024年8月招募了已知脂肪变性或有脂肪变性风险的成年人。两名操作员中的一名使用单个超声装置获得了AC采集的视频。两位操作员都独立地查看了所有视频,并放置了圆形ROI,以获得四种ROI深度(从肝包膜到ROI外缘的2.0、2.5、3.0和4.0 cm)、三种ROI尺寸(3.0、3.5和4.0 cm)和两个置信度图阈值(20%和40%)的所有24种可能组合的AC测量值。参与者接受MRI PDFF测量作为参考。结果:共纳入101例受试者(平均年龄54.5±12.1岁;62名女性,39名男性)。所有组合的算子间一致性极好(类内相关系数:0.92-0.98)。交流测量显示,在ROI深度为4.0 cm时,与MRI PDFF的相关性最强(操作员1和操作员2的Spearman rho分别为0.81和0.80)。考虑到MRI PDFF和AUC在脂肪变性分级中的相关性,最佳组合包括深度4.0 cm,大小4.0 cm,阈值40%。该组合检测>、>和>分级脂肪变性的AUC,操作员1分别为0.93、0.88和0.81,操作员2分别为0.92、0.86和0.81。然而,当深度为3.0 cm,尺寸为4.0 cm,阈值为40%时,检测脂肪变性(>级)的准确率最高(操作员1,90.1%;操作员2,82.2%)。结论:AC测量在参数组合中显示了良好的操作员间一致性。与MRI PDFF的相关性在4.0 cm深度处最强。确定了诊断效能最高的组合。临床影响:这些结果将有助于确定超声AC测量的标准化最佳方案,促进肝脂肪定量的临床采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
920
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信