Pregnancy After Bariatric Surgery: A Comparison of Antenatal Care Practices With the 2019 International Consensus Recommendations in Queensland, Australia.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Rachel Willims, Hayley Sullivan, Lynda Ross, Taylor Guthrie, Penny Wolski, Ann-Maree Craven, Christoph Lehner, Leonie Callaway, Victoria Eley, Helen L MacLaughlin, Susan D E Jersey
{"title":"Pregnancy After Bariatric Surgery: A Comparison of Antenatal Care Practices With the 2019 International Consensus Recommendations in Queensland, Australia.","authors":"Rachel Willims, Hayley Sullivan, Lynda Ross, Taylor Guthrie, Penny Wolski, Ann-Maree Craven, Christoph Lehner, Leonie Callaway, Victoria Eley, Helen L MacLaughlin, Susan D E Jersey","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical practice guidelines recommend additional monitoring in pregnancy for women post-bariatric surgery, to reduce the risk of maternal and infant complications.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine if pregnancy care post-bariatric surgery at an Australian quaternary public hospital is consistent with guidelines and to report on perinatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective audit of medical records and perinatal outcomes from post-bariatric surgery pregnancies from June 2016 to February 2021 was completed. Micronutrient monitoring and supplementation practices, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening, gestational weight gain (GWG) and fetal growth (FG) monitoring were compared with guidelines. Perinatal outcomes were compared with Queensland and Australian population data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three women meeting the inclusion criteria delivered 86 infants. Twenty percent (n = 16) had recommended GDM screening, 86% (n = 71) recommended FG monitoring at 12-weeks and 98% (n = 81) at 20-weeks, but only 24% (n = 20) had monthly monitoring from viability. GWG monitoring was 95% (n = 79) in the second trimester and 94% (n = 78) in the third trimester. Monitoring rates were highest for iron, and lowest for copper and selenium. Adverse infant outcomes for length of stay, neonatal intensive and special care admissions and caesarean section were significantly higher than the Queensland and Australian populations (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence with consensus recommendations aligning to standard antenatal monitoring for the general population was high, but additional monitoring for post-bariatric surgery specific care was lower. The evidence suggesting increased rates of adverse perinatal outcomes highlights the importance of consistency and adherence with post-bariatric surgery specific care for this group during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines recommend additional monitoring in pregnancy for women post-bariatric surgery, to reduce the risk of maternal and infant complications.

Aim: To examine if pregnancy care post-bariatric surgery at an Australian quaternary public hospital is consistent with guidelines and to report on perinatal outcomes.

Materials and methods: A retrospective audit of medical records and perinatal outcomes from post-bariatric surgery pregnancies from June 2016 to February 2021 was completed. Micronutrient monitoring and supplementation practices, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening, gestational weight gain (GWG) and fetal growth (FG) monitoring were compared with guidelines. Perinatal outcomes were compared with Queensland and Australian population data.

Results: Eighty-three women meeting the inclusion criteria delivered 86 infants. Twenty percent (n = 16) had recommended GDM screening, 86% (n = 71) recommended FG monitoring at 12-weeks and 98% (n = 81) at 20-weeks, but only 24% (n = 20) had monthly monitoring from viability. GWG monitoring was 95% (n = 79) in the second trimester and 94% (n = 78) in the third trimester. Monitoring rates were highest for iron, and lowest for copper and selenium. Adverse infant outcomes for length of stay, neonatal intensive and special care admissions and caesarean section were significantly higher than the Queensland and Australian populations (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Adherence with consensus recommendations aligning to standard antenatal monitoring for the general population was high, but additional monitoring for post-bariatric surgery specific care was lower. The evidence suggesting increased rates of adverse perinatal outcomes highlights the importance of consistency and adherence with post-bariatric surgery specific care for this group during pregnancy.

减肥手术后怀孕:澳大利亚昆士兰州2019年产前保健实践与国际共识建议的比较
背景:临床实践指南建议对减肥手术后的孕妇进行额外的孕期监测,以降低母婴并发症的风险。目的:检查澳大利亚一家第四公立医院减肥手术后的妊娠护理是否符合指南,并报告围产期结局。材料和方法:对2016年6月至2021年2月减肥手术后妊娠的医疗记录和围产期结局进行回顾性审计。将微量营养素监测和补充做法、妊娠糖尿病(GDM)筛查、妊娠体重增加(GWG)和胎儿生长(FG)监测与指南进行比较。围产期结局比较昆士兰州和澳大利亚人口数据。结果:83名符合纳入标准的妇女分娩了86名婴儿。20% (n = 16)建议进行GDM筛查,86% (n = 71)建议在12周时进行FG监测,98% (n = 81)建议在20周时进行FG监测,但只有24% (n = 20)每月进行活力监测。妊娠中期GWG监测为95% (n = 79),妊娠晚期为94% (n = 78)。铁的监测率最高,铜和硒的监测率最低。与昆士兰和澳大利亚人群相比,住院时间、新生儿重症监护和特殊护理入院以及剖宫产的不良婴儿结局明显更高(所有p结论:对一般人群一致建议的依从性高,与标准产前监测一致,但对减肥手术后特殊护理的额外监测较低。有证据表明,不良围产期结局发生率的增加,强调了在怀孕期间对这一群体进行减肥手术后特殊护理的一致性和依从性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信