A Deep-Learning-Enabled Workflow to Estimate Real-World Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Study Using De-identified Electronic Health Records.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.2196/64697
Gowtham Varma, Rohit Kumar Yenukoti, Praveen Kumar M, Bandlamudi Sai Ashrit, K Purushotham, C Subash, Sunil Kumar Ravi, Verghese Kurien, Avinash Aman, Mithun Manoharan, Shashank Jaiswal, Akash Anand, Rakesh Barve, Viswanathan Thiagarajan, Patrick Lenehan, Scott A Soefje, Venky Soundararajan
{"title":"A Deep-Learning-Enabled Workflow to Estimate Real-World Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Study Using De-identified Electronic Health Records.","authors":"Gowtham Varma, Rohit Kumar Yenukoti, Praveen Kumar M, Bandlamudi Sai Ashrit, K Purushotham, C Subash, Sunil Kumar Ravi, Verghese Kurien, Avinash Aman, Mithun Manoharan, Shashank Jaiswal, Akash Anand, Rakesh Barve, Viswanathan Thiagarajan, Patrick Lenehan, Scott A Soefje, Venky Soundararajan","doi":"10.2196/64697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Progression-free survival (PFS) is a crucial endpoint in cancer drug research. The clinician-confirmed cancer progression, namely real-world PFS (rwPFS) in unstructured text (i.e. clinical notes) has been shown to serve as a reasonable surrogate for real-world indicators in ascertaining progression endpoints. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST) is traditionally used in clinical trials using serial imaging evaluations, which is not practical when working with real-world data. Manual abstraction of clinical progression from unstructured notes continues to be the gold standard. However, this process is a resource-intensive and time-consuming process. Natural Language processing(NLP), a subdomain of machine learning, has shown promise in accelerating the extraction of tumor progression from real world data in recent years.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to configure a pre-trained, general-purpose healthcare NLP framework to transform free-text clinical notes and radiology reports into structured progression events for studying rwPFS on metastatic breast cancer (mBC) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study developed and validated a novel semi-automated workflow to estimate rwPFS in patients with mBC using de-identified EHR data from the nference nSights platform. The developed workflow was validated in a cohort of 316 patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)2-negative mBC, who were started on Palbociclib and Letrozole combination therapy between January 2015 and December 2021. Ground-truth datasets were curated to evaluate the workflow's performance at both the sentence and patient levels. NLP-captured progression or a change in therapy line were considered outcome events, while death, loss to follow-up, and end of study period were considered censoring events for rwPFS computation. Peak reduction and cumulative decline in Patient-Health-Questoinnaire-8(PHQ-8) scores were analyzed in the progressed and non-progressed patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The configured clinical NLP engine achieved a sentence-level progression capture accuracy of 98.2%. At the patient level, initial progression was captured within ±30 days with 88% accuracy. The median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) for the study cohort(N=316) was 20 months (95% CI: 18.0-25.0). In a validation subset(N=100), rwPFS determined by manual curation was 25 months (95% CI: 15-35 months), closely aligning with the computational workflow's 22 months (95% CI: 15-35 months). A sub-analysis revealed rwPFS estimates of 30 months (95% CI: 24.0-39.0) from radiology reports and 23 months (95% CI: 19.0-28.0) from clinical notes, highlighting the importance of integrating multiple note sources. External validation also demonstrated high accuracy (92.5%-sentence-level; 90.2%-patient-level). Sensitivity analysis revealed stable rwPFS estimates across varying levels of missing source data and event definitions. Peak reduction and cumulative decline in PHQ-8 scores during the study period highlighted significant associations between patient-reported outcomes and disease progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This workflow enables rapid and reliable determination of rwPFS in mBC patients receiving combination therapy. Further validation across more diverse external datasets and other cancer types is needed to ensure broader applicability and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is a crucial endpoint in cancer drug research. The clinician-confirmed cancer progression, namely real-world PFS (rwPFS) in unstructured text (i.e. clinical notes) has been shown to serve as a reasonable surrogate for real-world indicators in ascertaining progression endpoints. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST) is traditionally used in clinical trials using serial imaging evaluations, which is not practical when working with real-world data. Manual abstraction of clinical progression from unstructured notes continues to be the gold standard. However, this process is a resource-intensive and time-consuming process. Natural Language processing(NLP), a subdomain of machine learning, has shown promise in accelerating the extraction of tumor progression from real world data in recent years.

Objective: We aim to configure a pre-trained, general-purpose healthcare NLP framework to transform free-text clinical notes and radiology reports into structured progression events for studying rwPFS on metastatic breast cancer (mBC) cohorts.

Methods: This study developed and validated a novel semi-automated workflow to estimate rwPFS in patients with mBC using de-identified EHR data from the nference nSights platform. The developed workflow was validated in a cohort of 316 patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)2-negative mBC, who were started on Palbociclib and Letrozole combination therapy between January 2015 and December 2021. Ground-truth datasets were curated to evaluate the workflow's performance at both the sentence and patient levels. NLP-captured progression or a change in therapy line were considered outcome events, while death, loss to follow-up, and end of study period were considered censoring events for rwPFS computation. Peak reduction and cumulative decline in Patient-Health-Questoinnaire-8(PHQ-8) scores were analyzed in the progressed and non-progressed patient subgroups.

Results: The configured clinical NLP engine achieved a sentence-level progression capture accuracy of 98.2%. At the patient level, initial progression was captured within ±30 days with 88% accuracy. The median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) for the study cohort(N=316) was 20 months (95% CI: 18.0-25.0). In a validation subset(N=100), rwPFS determined by manual curation was 25 months (95% CI: 15-35 months), closely aligning with the computational workflow's 22 months (95% CI: 15-35 months). A sub-analysis revealed rwPFS estimates of 30 months (95% CI: 24.0-39.0) from radiology reports and 23 months (95% CI: 19.0-28.0) from clinical notes, highlighting the importance of integrating multiple note sources. External validation also demonstrated high accuracy (92.5%-sentence-level; 90.2%-patient-level). Sensitivity analysis revealed stable rwPFS estimates across varying levels of missing source data and event definitions. Peak reduction and cumulative decline in PHQ-8 scores during the study period highlighted significant associations between patient-reported outcomes and disease progression.

Conclusions: This workflow enables rapid and reliable determination of rwPFS in mBC patients receiving combination therapy. Further validation across more diverse external datasets and other cancer types is needed to ensure broader applicability and generalizability.

Clinicaltrial:

一个深度学习支持的工作流程来估计转移性乳腺癌患者的真实世界无进展生存:使用去识别电子健康记录的研究
背景:无进展生存期(PFS)是癌症药物研究的一个重要终点。临床证实的癌症进展,即非结构化文本(即临床记录)中的真实PFS (rwPFS)已被证明可以作为确定进展终点的真实指标的合理替代品。实体肿瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)传统上用于临床试验,使用连续成像评估,这在处理真实世界数据时并不实用。手工从非结构化笔记中提取临床进展仍然是黄金标准。然而,这个过程是一个资源密集且耗时的过程。自然语言处理(NLP)是机器学习的一个子领域,近年来在加速从现实世界数据中提取肿瘤进展方面显示出了希望。目的:我们的目标是配置一个预先训练的通用医疗NLP框架,将自由文本临床记录和放射学报告转换为结构化的进展事件,用于研究转移性乳腺癌(mBC)队列的rwPFS。方法:本研究开发并验证了一种新的半自动化工作流程,使用来自nSights平台的去识别电子病历数据来估计mBC患者的rwPFS。开发的工作流程在316例激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)2阴性的mBC患者中得到验证,这些患者在2015年1月至2021年12月期间开始接受帕博西尼和来曲唑联合治疗。整理了基本事实数据集,以评估工作流在句子和患者水平上的表现。nlp捕获的进展或治疗线的改变被认为是结局事件,而死亡、随访失败和研究期结束被认为是rwPFS计算的审查事件。在进展和非进展患者亚组中分析患者健康问卷-8(PHQ-8)评分的峰值降低和累积下降。结果:配置的临床NLP引擎实现了98.2%的句子级进度捕获准确率。在患者水平,在±30天内捕获初始进展,准确率为88%。研究队列(N=316)的中位真实无进展生存期(rwPFS)为20个月(95% CI: 18.0-25.0)。在验证子集(N=100)中,通过人工筛选确定的rwPFS为25个月(95% CI: 15-35个月),与计算工作流的22个月(95% CI: 15-35个月)密切一致。次级分析显示放射学报告的rwPFS估计为30个月(95% CI: 24.0-39.0),临床记录的rwPFS估计为23个月(95% CI: 19.0-28.0),强调了整合多个记录来源的重要性。外部验证也显示出较高的准确性(92.5%-句子级;90.2%患者的立场)。敏感性分析显示,在不同级别的缺失源数据和事件定义中,rwPFS估计值是稳定的。在研究期间,PHQ-8评分的峰值降低和累积下降突出了患者报告的结果与疾病进展之间的显著关联。结论:该工作流程能够快速可靠地测定接受联合治疗的mBC患者的rwPFS。需要对更多样化的外部数据集和其他癌症类型进行进一步验证,以确保更广泛的适用性和普遍性。临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信