Agile Implementation of a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Dementia in Primary Care.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diana Summanwar, Nicole R Fowler, Dustin B Hammers, Anthony J Perkins, Jared R Brosch, Deanna R Willis
{"title":"Agile Implementation of a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Dementia in Primary Care.","authors":"Diana Summanwar, Nicole R Fowler, Dustin B Hammers, Anthony J Perkins, Jared R Brosch, Deanna R Willis","doi":"10.1370/afm.240294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess how agile implementation-driven iterative processes and tailored workflows can facilitate the implementation of a digital cognitive assessment (DCA) tool for patients aged 65 years or older into primary care practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used agile implementation principles to integrate a DCA tool into routine workflows across 7 primary care clinics. The intervention involved a structured selection process for identifying an appropriate DCA tool, stakeholder engagement through iterative sprints (structured, time-bound cycles), and development of tailored workflows to meet clinic-specific needs. A brain health navigator role was established to support patients with positive or borderline screenings, and assist primary care clinicians with follow-up assessment. We used the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the intervention's performance over a 12-month period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention engaged 69 (63.8%) of 108 clinicians across the 7 clinics. DCA screening was completed in 1,808 (10.8%) of 16,708 eligible visits. We selected the Linus Health Core Cognitive Evaluation tool as our DCA tool based on stakeholder evaluations. Screening workflows were tailored to each clinic. The brain health navigator received 447 referrals for further assessment of a positive or borderline screening result. Four clinics fully adopted the intervention, achieving a DCA completion rate of at least 20%, and 5 clinics were still routinely using the DCA tool at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agile implementation effectively helped integrate the DCA tool into primary care workflows. Customized workflows, stakeholder engagement, and iterative improvements were crucial for adoption and sustainability. These insights can guide future efforts for early detection and management of cognitive impairment in primary care, ultimately improving patient outcomes and easing the burden on health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess how agile implementation-driven iterative processes and tailored workflows can facilitate the implementation of a digital cognitive assessment (DCA) tool for patients aged 65 years or older into primary care practices.

Methods: We used agile implementation principles to integrate a DCA tool into routine workflows across 7 primary care clinics. The intervention involved a structured selection process for identifying an appropriate DCA tool, stakeholder engagement through iterative sprints (structured, time-bound cycles), and development of tailored workflows to meet clinic-specific needs. A brain health navigator role was established to support patients with positive or borderline screenings, and assist primary care clinicians with follow-up assessment. We used the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the intervention's performance over a 12-month period.

Results: The intervention engaged 69 (63.8%) of 108 clinicians across the 7 clinics. DCA screening was completed in 1,808 (10.8%) of 16,708 eligible visits. We selected the Linus Health Core Cognitive Evaluation tool as our DCA tool based on stakeholder evaluations. Screening workflows were tailored to each clinic. The brain health navigator received 447 referrals for further assessment of a positive or borderline screening result. Four clinics fully adopted the intervention, achieving a DCA completion rate of at least 20%, and 5 clinics were still routinely using the DCA tool at 12 months.

Conclusions: Agile implementation effectively helped integrate the DCA tool into primary care workflows. Customized workflows, stakeholder engagement, and iterative improvements were crucial for adoption and sustainability. These insights can guide future efforts for early detection and management of cognitive impairment in primary care, ultimately improving patient outcomes and easing the burden on health care professionals.

初级保健中痴呆症数字认知评估的敏捷实施。
目的:本研究旨在评估敏捷实施驱动的迭代过程和量身定制的工作流程如何促进65岁或以上患者在初级保健实践中实施数字认知评估(DCA)工具。方法:我们使用敏捷实施原则将DCA工具集成到7个初级保健诊所的日常工作流程中。干预包括一个结构化的选择过程,以确定适当的DCA工具,利益相关者通过迭代冲刺(结构化的、有时间限制的周期)参与,以及开发定制的工作流程以满足临床特定需求。建立脑健康导航员角色,以支持阳性或边缘性筛查的患者,并协助初级保健临床医生进行随访评估。我们使用覆盖范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护(RE-AIM)框架来评估干预措施在12个月期间的表现。结果:7家诊所108名临床医生中有69名参与了干预,占63.8%。在16,708例符合条件的就诊中,有1,808例(10.8%)完成了DCA筛查。我们选择了Linus Health Core认知评估工具作为基于利益相关者评估的DCA工具。筛查工作流程针对每个诊所量身定制。脑健康导航员收到了447个转诊,以进一步评估阳性或边缘筛查结果。4家诊所完全采用了该干预措施,DCA完成率至少达到20%,5家诊所在12个月时仍常规使用DCA工具。结论:敏捷实施有效地帮助将DCA工具集成到初级保健工作流程中。定制工作流、涉众参与和迭代改进对于采用和可持续性至关重要。这些见解可以指导未来在初级保健中早期发现和管理认知障碍的工作,最终改善患者的治疗效果,减轻卫生保健专业人员的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信