Digital interventions for alcohol use and alcohol use disorders in low- and-middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Oxford open digital health Pub Date : 2025-01-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/oodh/oqaf004
Payal Khatore, Hizkia Yolanda, Jaeden Joyner, Abhijit Nadkarni
{"title":"Digital interventions for alcohol use and alcohol use disorders in low- and-middle-income countries: a systematic review.","authors":"Payal Khatore, Hizkia Yolanda, Jaeden Joyner, Abhijit Nadkarni","doi":"10.1093/oodh/oqaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the high burden of alcohol use and alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), access to health care is poor. Digital interventions (DIs) have recently emerged as promising avenues for addressing substance use. Such interventions could potentially address barriers to help-seeking in LMICs, such as travel costs, shortage of professionals, stigma, etc.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesize evidence on the effectiveness and implementation of DIs for AUDs in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review had a comprehensive search strategy that combined search terms for DIs (e.g. SMS, eHealth), alcohol use (e.g. hazardous drinking) and LMICs (e.g. India). Studies presenting primary data that reported effectiveness (e.g. relapse) and/or implementation or intervention-related outcomes (e.g. feasibility) of DIs for AUDs in LMICs were eligible. Three databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) were searched from their inception till June 2023. Data was extracted in relevant categories and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one reports from 19 studies were included. Types of DIs ranged from standalone mobile applications and web portals to human-delivered interventions via digital platforms. 12 studies reported positive or partially positive alcohol use outcomes (e.g. number of drinking days, abstinence). DIs with human involvement were found to be more effective than standalone DIs. Additionally, high levels of acceptability, feasibility and satisfaction were reported across interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DIs are acceptable and feasible in LMICs and broadly effective in improving alcohol use outcomes. Firm conclusions could not be drawn because of methodological issues such as small sample sizes, short follow-up periods and limited generalisability. Adequate investment, improved research methodology and increased focus on implementation outcomes are required for determining the role that DIs can play in addressing AUDs in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520498,"journal":{"name":"Oxford open digital health","volume":"3 ","pages":"oqaf004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford open digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oodh/oqaf004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the high burden of alcohol use and alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), access to health care is poor. Digital interventions (DIs) have recently emerged as promising avenues for addressing substance use. Such interventions could potentially address barriers to help-seeking in LMICs, such as travel costs, shortage of professionals, stigma, etc.

Aim: To synthesize evidence on the effectiveness and implementation of DIs for AUDs in LMICs.

Methods: The systematic review had a comprehensive search strategy that combined search terms for DIs (e.g. SMS, eHealth), alcohol use (e.g. hazardous drinking) and LMICs (e.g. India). Studies presenting primary data that reported effectiveness (e.g. relapse) and/or implementation or intervention-related outcomes (e.g. feasibility) of DIs for AUDs in LMICs were eligible. Three databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) were searched from their inception till June 2023. Data was extracted in relevant categories and analysed.

Results: Twenty-one reports from 19 studies were included. Types of DIs ranged from standalone mobile applications and web portals to human-delivered interventions via digital platforms. 12 studies reported positive or partially positive alcohol use outcomes (e.g. number of drinking days, abstinence). DIs with human involvement were found to be more effective than standalone DIs. Additionally, high levels of acceptability, feasibility and satisfaction were reported across interventions.

Conclusion: DIs are acceptable and feasible in LMICs and broadly effective in improving alcohol use outcomes. Firm conclusions could not be drawn because of methodological issues such as small sample sizes, short follow-up periods and limited generalisability. Adequate investment, improved research methodology and increased focus on implementation outcomes are required for determining the role that DIs can play in addressing AUDs in LMICs.

Abstract Image

低收入和中等收入国家酒精使用和酒精使用障碍的数字干预措施:系统审查。
背景:尽管低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的酒精使用和酒精使用障碍(AUDs)负担很高,但获得卫生保健的机会很差。数字干预措施(DIs)最近成为解决药物使用问题的有希望的途径。这些干预措施可能会潜在地解决中低收入国家寻求帮助的障碍,如差旅费用、专业人员短缺、耻辱感等。目的:综合证据,证明中低收入国家对自闭症患者实施DIs的有效性和实施情况。方法:系统评价采用综合搜索策略,将DIs(如短信、电子健康)、酒精使用(如危险饮酒)和中低收入国家(如印度)的搜索词结合起来。提供原始数据的研究报告了中低收入国家对AUDs的DIs的有效性(如复发)和/或实施或干预相关结果(如可行性)。检索了三个数据库(EMBASE, MEDLINE和PsycINFO),从其成立到2023年6月。提取相关类别的数据并进行分析。结果:纳入19项研究的21篇报道。DIs的类型包括从独立的移动应用程序和web门户到通过数字平台人工提供的干预措施。12项研究报告了阳性或部分阳性的酒精使用结果(如饮酒天数、戒酒)。研究发现,人工干预比独立干预更有效。此外,各种干预措施的可接受性、可行性和满意度都很高。结论:在中低收入国家,酒精使用干预是可接受和可行的,在改善酒精使用结果方面广泛有效。由于方法上的问题,例如样本量小、随访时间短和普遍性有限,无法得出确定的结论。要确定发展中国家在解决中低收入国家发展不足方面可以发挥的作用,需要有足够的投资、改进的研究方法和对实施结果的更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信