Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors and ablative radiotherapy in metastatic cancers: a meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.

BMJ oncology Pub Date : 2025-05-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000732
Eduardo Urias, Jaehoon Lee, Christopher R Weil, Eric Roach, Shane Lloyd, Mia Hashibe, Andrea Facciabene, Amit Maity, Randa Tao
{"title":"Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors and ablative radiotherapy in metastatic cancers: a meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.","authors":"Eduardo Urias, Jaehoon Lee, Christopher R Weil, Eric Roach, Shane Lloyd, Mia Hashibe, Andrea Facciabene, Amit Maity, Randa Tao","doi":"10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To pool data from prospective clinical trials investigating combined stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with metastatic cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE were queried for full-length articles of prospective clinical trials involving patients with metastatic solid tumours. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed with the Knapp-Hartung method. Multilevel regression analyses with primary cancers used as random effects and pairwise comparisons with two-tailed test adjusted with Benjamini-Hochberg method were performed. Regression coefficients (β) were calculated to assess the correlation between dose and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 30 trials and 35 individual treatment arms with a total of 951 patients with at least one outcome metric reported. Large heterogeneity was identified for all outcomes measured (I<sup>2</sup> range: 75%-86%). The pooled rate of grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events was 18% (95% CI 11% to 24%). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 6 months were 27% (95% CI 19% to 36%) and 67% (95% CI 59% to 76%), respectively. On multilevel regression, we identified improvement in 6-month PFS (β=0.6, p=0.003) and OS (β=1.6, p=0.04) with increasing BED10Gy doses. Combined-target ICI correlated with better 6-month OS when compared with αPD-1/PD-L1 alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report a safety profile of combined ICI with SABR in patients with metastatic cancer that is comparable to that of ICI alone. We identified higher doses of radiotherapy and dual-target ICI to be associated with better OS at 6 months. Large heterogeneity and the lack of a control group limit the interpretation of our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72436,"journal":{"name":"BMJ oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000732"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To pool data from prospective clinical trials investigating combined stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with metastatic cancers.

Methods and analysis: PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE were queried for full-length articles of prospective clinical trials involving patients with metastatic solid tumours. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed with the Knapp-Hartung method. Multilevel regression analyses with primary cancers used as random effects and pairwise comparisons with two-tailed test adjusted with Benjamini-Hochberg method were performed. Regression coefficients (β) were calculated to assess the correlation between dose and outcomes.

Results: We identified 30 trials and 35 individual treatment arms with a total of 951 patients with at least one outcome metric reported. Large heterogeneity was identified for all outcomes measured (I2 range: 75%-86%). The pooled rate of grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events was 18% (95% CI 11% to 24%). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 6 months were 27% (95% CI 19% to 36%) and 67% (95% CI 59% to 76%), respectively. On multilevel regression, we identified improvement in 6-month PFS (β=0.6, p=0.003) and OS (β=1.6, p=0.04) with increasing BED10Gy doses. Combined-target ICI correlated with better 6-month OS when compared with αPD-1/PD-L1 alone.

Conclusion: We report a safety profile of combined ICI with SABR in patients with metastatic cancer that is comparable to that of ICI alone. We identified higher doses of radiotherapy and dual-target ICI to be associated with better OS at 6 months. Large heterogeneity and the lack of a control group limit the interpretation of our findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

联合免疫检查点抑制剂和消融放疗治疗转移性癌症:前瞻性临床试验的荟萃分析。
目的:汇总研究立体定向消融放疗(SABR)联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗转移性癌症患者的前瞻性临床试验数据。方法和分析:通过PubMed、Scopus和EMBASE查询涉及转移性实体瘤患者的前瞻性临床试验的全文文章。随机效应荟萃分析采用Knapp-Hartung方法。采用随机效应对原发癌症进行多水平回归分析,并采用Benjamini-Hochberg法校正双尾检验进行两两比较。计算回归系数(β)来评估剂量与结果之间的相关性。结果:我们确定了30项试验和35个单独的治疗组,共951例患者,至少报告了一个结局指标。所有测量结果均存在较大异质性(I2范围:75%-86%)。3+级治疗相关不良事件的总发生率为18% (95% CI为11%至24%)。6个月无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为27% (95% CI 19% ~ 36%)和67% (95% CI 59% ~ 76%)。在多水平回归中,我们发现随着BED10Gy剂量的增加,6个月的PFS (β=0.6, p=0.003)和OS (β=1.6, p=0.04)得到改善。与单独αPD-1/PD-L1相比,联合靶向ICI与更好的6个月OS相关。结论:我们报告了转移性癌症患者联合ICI与SABR的安全性与单独ICI相当。我们发现高剂量放疗和双靶点ICI与6个月时更好的OS相关。大的异质性和缺乏对照组限制了我们研究结果的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信