First-Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors: 1-Year Follow-Up of the FIRST-Dx Study

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Science Pub Date : 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1111/cas.70077
Junichi Matsubara, Kumi Mukai, Tomohiro Kondo, Masahiro Yoshioka, Hidenori Kage, Katsutoshi Oda, Sadakatsu Ikeda, Hiromichi Ebi, Kei Muro, Shinya Kajiura, Ryuji Hayashi, Reiko Ashida, Masayuki Kitano, Manabu Muto
{"title":"First-Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors: 1-Year Follow-Up of the FIRST-Dx Study","authors":"Junichi Matsubara,&nbsp;Kumi Mukai,&nbsp;Tomohiro Kondo,&nbsp;Masahiro Yoshioka,&nbsp;Hidenori Kage,&nbsp;Katsutoshi Oda,&nbsp;Sadakatsu Ikeda,&nbsp;Hiromichi Ebi,&nbsp;Kei Muro,&nbsp;Shinya Kajiura,&nbsp;Ryuji Hayashi,&nbsp;Reiko Ashida,&nbsp;Masayuki Kitano,&nbsp;Manabu Muto","doi":"10.1111/cas.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The FIRST-Dx study prospectively evaluated the clinical utility of the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test (FoundationOne CDx) in the first-line setting for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced solid tumors (gastrointestinal, biliary, pancreatic, lung, breast, gynecologic, melanoma) in six hospitals in Japan. Here, we report the results of the 1-year interim analysis of the follow-up study about the clinical benefits provided by the upfront CGP test. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients who actually received molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT) determined by the molecular tumor board, best overall response rate (ORR) in each line of therapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) ratio (PFS on MBRT/PFS on the first-line therapy). Data from 172 patients with a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range: 0.1–21.5 months) were available. The median OS was not reached. Thirty-nine patients (22.7%) received MBRT during this follow-up period. ORR in first-line therapy was 56.3% in the MBRT group (<i>n</i> = 16) vs. 42.3% in the non-MBRT group (<i>n</i> = 137), and in the second-line was 26.3% in the MBRT group (<i>n</i> = 19) vs. 17.1% in the non-MBRT group (<i>n</i> = 82). Regarding the PFS ratio of second-line MBRT (<i>n</i> = 12), the median PFS ratio was 1.1, and four patients (33.3%) had a ratio ≥ 1.3, indicating that MBRT might be effective in changing the clinical outcome. The findings of this study imply that CGP testing before the standard of care for patients with advanced solid tumors could prove to be a clinically beneficial strategy for guiding subsequent precision anticancer treatments.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) ID: jRCT1050220041</p>","PeriodicalId":9580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Science","volume":"116 7","pages":"1908-1919"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cas.70077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cas.70077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The FIRST-Dx study prospectively evaluated the clinical utility of the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test (FoundationOne CDx) in the first-line setting for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced solid tumors (gastrointestinal, biliary, pancreatic, lung, breast, gynecologic, melanoma) in six hospitals in Japan. Here, we report the results of the 1-year interim analysis of the follow-up study about the clinical benefits provided by the upfront CGP test. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients who actually received molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT) determined by the molecular tumor board, best overall response rate (ORR) in each line of therapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) ratio (PFS on MBRT/PFS on the first-line therapy). Data from 172 patients with a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range: 0.1–21.5 months) were available. The median OS was not reached. Thirty-nine patients (22.7%) received MBRT during this follow-up period. ORR in first-line therapy was 56.3% in the MBRT group (n = 16) vs. 42.3% in the non-MBRT group (n = 137), and in the second-line was 26.3% in the MBRT group (n = 19) vs. 17.1% in the non-MBRT group (n = 82). Regarding the PFS ratio of second-line MBRT (n = 12), the median PFS ratio was 1.1, and four patients (33.3%) had a ratio ≥ 1.3, indicating that MBRT might be effective in changing the clinical outcome. The findings of this study imply that CGP testing before the standard of care for patients with advanced solid tumors could prove to be a clinically beneficial strategy for guiding subsequent precision anticancer treatments.

Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) ID: jRCT1050220041

Abstract Image

未经治疗的晚期实体瘤的一线基因组分析:FIRST-Dx研究的1年随访。
FIRST-Dx研究前瞻性地评估了综合基因组谱(CGP)测试(FoundationOne CDx)在日本六家医院的chemotherapy-naïve晚期实体瘤(胃肠道、胆道、胰腺、肺、乳腺、妇科、黑色素瘤)患者的一线环境中的临床应用。在这里,我们报告了一项为期1年的随访研究的中期分析结果,该研究是关于前期CGP测试提供的临床益处的。主要终点是总生存期(OS),次要终点是实际接受由分子肿瘤委员会确定的基于分子的推荐治疗(MBRT)的患者比例,每条治疗线的最佳总缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS)比(MBRT的PFS /一线治疗的PFS)。172例患者的数据,中位随访时间为15.1个月(范围:0.1-21.5个月)。未达到中位操作系统。39例患者(22.7%)在随访期间接受了MBRT治疗。一线治疗的ORR在MBRT组为56.3% (n = 16),而非MBRT组为42.3% (n = 137),二线治疗的ORR在MBRT组为26.3% (n = 19),而非MBRT组为17.1% (n = 82)。二线MBRT的PFS比(n = 12)中位PFS比为1.1,4例(33.3%)患者的PFS比≥1.3,表明MBRT可能有效改变临床结局。本研究结果表明,在晚期实体瘤患者的标准治疗前进行CGP检测可能被证明是指导后续精确抗癌治疗的临床有益策略。试验注册:日本临床试验注册中心(jRCT) ID: jRCT1050220041。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Science
Cancer Science 医学-肿瘤学
自引率
3.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Science (formerly Japanese Journal of Cancer Research) is a monthly publication of the Japanese Cancer Association. First published in 1907, the Journal continues to publish original articles, editorials, and letters to the editor, describing original research in the fields of basic, translational and clinical cancer research. The Journal also accepts reports and case reports. Cancer Science aims to present highly significant and timely findings that have a significant clinical impact on oncologists or that may alter the disease concept of a tumor. The Journal will not publish case reports that describe a rare tumor or condition without new findings to be added to previous reports; combination of different tumors without new suggestive findings for oncological research; remarkable effect of already known treatments without suggestive data to explain the exceptional result. Review articles may also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信