Confined space airway management: a narrative review.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Soren S Rudolph, Christopher W Root, Michael Friis Tvede, Trond Fedog, Patrick Wenger, Mikael Gellerfors, Jelsche Apel, Luca Ünlü
{"title":"Confined space airway management: a narrative review.","authors":"Soren S Rudolph, Christopher W Root, Michael Friis Tvede, Trond Fedog, Patrick Wenger, Mikael Gellerfors, Jelsche Apel, Luca Ünlü","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01357-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Airway management is a critical component of prehospital and emergency care, often complicated by the environment in which it is performed. Confined space airway management (CSAM) refers to scenarios were restricted physical space challenges conventional airway techniques. These situations may occur in unpredictable environments, such as vehicle entrapments or collapsed structures, and controlled settings like helicopters. This narrative review aims to synthesize current knowledge, expert opinions, and evidence on CSAM.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>CSAM poses logistical and technical challenges, including limited access to the patient, restricted movement, and reduced visibility. These factors increase the difficulty of performing standard airway management procedures and increase the risk of complications. Supraglottic airways (SGA), due to their ease of insertion and high success rates, are recommended as a first-line approach in CSAM, especially when intubation is delayed or infeasible. Tracheal intubation (TI) may require significant modifications in technique. Alternative methods and adjuncts such as face-to-face intubation and stylets may be considered but are highly dependent on provider expertise and the specific scenario. Emergency front of neck access (eFONA) is provided with high success rated in confined spaces. In controlled settings, systematic preparation can improve success rates and reduce procedural times. In uncontrolled environments, prioritizing patient extrication and maintaining oxygenation is essential, as definitive airway management may conflict with rescue efforts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSAM requires a strategic blend of medical expertise, adaptive techniques, and logistical planning. A focus on training, preparedness, and the use of supraglottic airway devices may mitigate challenges in these high-stakes scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01357-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Airway management is a critical component of prehospital and emergency care, often complicated by the environment in which it is performed. Confined space airway management (CSAM) refers to scenarios were restricted physical space challenges conventional airway techniques. These situations may occur in unpredictable environments, such as vehicle entrapments or collapsed structures, and controlled settings like helicopters. This narrative review aims to synthesize current knowledge, expert opinions, and evidence on CSAM.

Main body: CSAM poses logistical and technical challenges, including limited access to the patient, restricted movement, and reduced visibility. These factors increase the difficulty of performing standard airway management procedures and increase the risk of complications. Supraglottic airways (SGA), due to their ease of insertion and high success rates, are recommended as a first-line approach in CSAM, especially when intubation is delayed or infeasible. Tracheal intubation (TI) may require significant modifications in technique. Alternative methods and adjuncts such as face-to-face intubation and stylets may be considered but are highly dependent on provider expertise and the specific scenario. Emergency front of neck access (eFONA) is provided with high success rated in confined spaces. In controlled settings, systematic preparation can improve success rates and reduce procedural times. In uncontrolled environments, prioritizing patient extrication and maintaining oxygenation is essential, as definitive airway management may conflict with rescue efforts.

Conclusion: CSAM requires a strategic blend of medical expertise, adaptive techniques, and logistical planning. A focus on training, preparedness, and the use of supraglottic airway devices may mitigate challenges in these high-stakes scenarios.

密闭空间气道管理:述评。
背景:气道管理是院前和急诊护理的重要组成部分,往往因其所处的环境而复杂化。受限空间气道管理(CSAM)是指传统气道技术面临受限物理空间挑战的情况。这些情况可能发生在不可预测的环境中,例如车辆被困或倒塌的建筑物,以及直升机等受控环境。这篇叙述性综述旨在综合当前的知识、专家意见和证据。主体:CSAM带来了后勤和技术上的挑战,包括接触病人受限、活动受限和能见度降低。这些因素增加了执行标准气道管理程序的难度,并增加了并发症的风险。声门上气道(SGA)由于其易于插入和成功率高,被推荐作为CSAM的一线入路,特别是当插管延迟或不可行的时候。气管插管(TI)可能需要在技术上进行重大修改。可以考虑其他方法和辅助手段,如面对面插管和插管,但这在很大程度上取决于提供者的专业知识和具体情况。颈前紧急通道(eFONA)在密闭空间中成功率很高。在受控环境下,系统的准备可以提高成功率并减少程序时间。在不受控制的环境中,优先考虑患者的解救和维持氧合是必不可少的,因为明确的气道管理可能与救援工作相冲突。结论:CSAM需要医学专业知识、适应性技术和后勤规划的战略融合。关注训练、准备和使用声门上气道设备可能会减轻这些高风险情况下的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信