Interprofessional collaboration: Measuring occupational therapists and teachers' perceptions of collaborative practice in inclusive Australian primary schools.
{"title":"Interprofessional collaboration: Measuring occupational therapists and teachers' perceptions of collaborative practice in inclusive Australian primary schools.","authors":"Jill Jeremy, Joanne Hinitt, Ilektra Spandagou","doi":"10.1177/03080226241295601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Globally occupational therapists are collaborating with teachers to support the inclusion of students with disabilities in mainstream schools. To begin to understand how collaboration promotes inclusion, this study aimed to measure occupational therapists and teachers perceived collaborative practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quantitative cross-sectional analysis of occupational therapists and teachers in mainstream primary schools in three Australian states was conducted via an anonymous online survey. Eligible participants were recruited via self-selection and snowballing, resulting in a nonprobability sample of 108 occupational therapists and 33 primary teachers. The Teacher - Therapist Collaboration Index, an instrument based on an existing conceptual framework and associated tool was developed to measure perceived collaborative practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Occupational therapist and teacher profiles were similar. Both professions report above average collaborative practice, although teachers rated themselves more collaborative on two components. Ratings did not significantly differ by profession, demographic, or background. Personal, professional and systems influences positively correlated with collaboration ratings, with systems having the strongest relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Systems changes may be necessary to improve collaboration. Therapists could use the framework and measurement instrument as tools to plan, execute and evaluate their collaborative practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49096,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"88 5","pages":"302-313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226241295601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Globally occupational therapists are collaborating with teachers to support the inclusion of students with disabilities in mainstream schools. To begin to understand how collaboration promotes inclusion, this study aimed to measure occupational therapists and teachers perceived collaborative practice.
Method: A quantitative cross-sectional analysis of occupational therapists and teachers in mainstream primary schools in three Australian states was conducted via an anonymous online survey. Eligible participants were recruited via self-selection and snowballing, resulting in a nonprobability sample of 108 occupational therapists and 33 primary teachers. The Teacher - Therapist Collaboration Index, an instrument based on an existing conceptual framework and associated tool was developed to measure perceived collaborative practice.
Results: Occupational therapist and teacher profiles were similar. Both professions report above average collaborative practice, although teachers rated themselves more collaborative on two components. Ratings did not significantly differ by profession, demographic, or background. Personal, professional and systems influences positively correlated with collaboration ratings, with systems having the strongest relationship.
Conclusion: Systems changes may be necessary to improve collaboration. Therapists could use the framework and measurement instrument as tools to plan, execute and evaluate their collaborative practice.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles with international relevance that advance knowledge in research, practice, education, and management in occupational therapy. It is a monthly peer reviewed publication that disseminates evidence on the effectiveness, benefit, and value of occupational therapy so that occupational therapists, service users, and key stakeholders can make informed decisions. BJOT publishes research articles, reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor and book reviews. It also regularly publishes special issues on topics relevant to occupational therapy.