Creating a Mammography Conversation Aid for Shared Decision-Making Between Clinicians and Women Aged 75 and Older.

Mara A Schonberg, Natasha K Stout, Sarah Stein, Matthew Corey, Jessica Jushchyshyn, Ria Shah, Emily Wolfson, Jeanne S Mandelblatt, Victor M Montori, Ilana Richman, Daniel Matlock, Clyde B Schechter, Russell Harris, Barbara LeStage, Jinani Jayasekera, Nancy L Schoenborn
{"title":"Creating a Mammography Conversation Aid for Shared Decision-Making Between Clinicians and Women Aged 75 and Older.","authors":"Mara A Schonberg, Natasha K Stout, Sarah Stein, Matthew Corey, Jessica Jushchyshyn, Ria Shah, Emily Wolfson, Jeanne S Mandelblatt, Victor M Montori, Ilana Richman, Daniel Matlock, Clyde B Schechter, Russell Harris, Barbara LeStage, Jinani Jayasekera, Nancy L Schoenborn","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend primary care practitioners (\"PCPs\") engage women ≥ 75 years in shared decision-making (SDM) around mammography screening. Therefore, we aimed to develop a web-based conversation aid about mammography screening for women ≥ 75 using output from established simulation models to provide screening outcomes based on > 23,000 combinations of individual women's health and breast cancer risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an end-user centered design approach to develop a prototype web-based conversation aid incorporating feedback. From July 2023 to April 2024, 10 PCPs from a Boston-area health system and a safety-net hospital used the prototype aid during encounters with women ≥ 75 without breast cancer or dementia (n = 30; 1-5 patients per PCP). We observed aid use and assessed clinician effort to involve patients in SDM using OPTION5 (assesses five components of SDM, scores range 0-100). We surveyed PCPs and patients about the aid's acceptability. Patients completed the SDM-process scale (scores range 0-4) to rate the SDM quality experienced. Participants' comments were subject to thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10 PCP-participants, seven were female and four were community-based. Of 30 patient-participants, 22 (73%) were non-Hispanic White, 9 (30%) had ≥ 2 Charlson comorbidities and mean age was 78.5 years (SD 2.8). Nine PCPs agreed that the aid helped them with SDM and was easy-to-use; six felt it had too much information; and seven planned to continue using the aid. Patients rated the SDM-process highly (scores = 3.0 [SD 0.9]) and we observed high SDM (mean OPTION5 = 77.9 [SD 20.6]). Participants felt the aid was \"empowering\" and \"helpful for decision-making.\" After SDM discussions, seven patients intended to stop screening, nine to screen less frequently, and 14 to continue screening regularly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a novel conversation aid that supports SDM about mammography screening with women ≥ 75 years. Lessons learned will guide revisions of a final tool for testing in a clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend primary care practitioners ("PCPs") engage women ≥ 75 years in shared decision-making (SDM) around mammography screening. Therefore, we aimed to develop a web-based conversation aid about mammography screening for women ≥ 75 using output from established simulation models to provide screening outcomes based on > 23,000 combinations of individual women's health and breast cancer risk factors.

Methods: We used an end-user centered design approach to develop a prototype web-based conversation aid incorporating feedback. From July 2023 to April 2024, 10 PCPs from a Boston-area health system and a safety-net hospital used the prototype aid during encounters with women ≥ 75 without breast cancer or dementia (n = 30; 1-5 patients per PCP). We observed aid use and assessed clinician effort to involve patients in SDM using OPTION5 (assesses five components of SDM, scores range 0-100). We surveyed PCPs and patients about the aid's acceptability. Patients completed the SDM-process scale (scores range 0-4) to rate the SDM quality experienced. Participants' comments were subject to thematic analysis.

Results: Of 10 PCP-participants, seven were female and four were community-based. Of 30 patient-participants, 22 (73%) were non-Hispanic White, 9 (30%) had ≥ 2 Charlson comorbidities and mean age was 78.5 years (SD 2.8). Nine PCPs agreed that the aid helped them with SDM and was easy-to-use; six felt it had too much information; and seven planned to continue using the aid. Patients rated the SDM-process highly (scores = 3.0 [SD 0.9]) and we observed high SDM (mean OPTION5 = 77.9 [SD 20.6]). Participants felt the aid was "empowering" and "helpful for decision-making." After SDM discussions, seven patients intended to stop screening, nine to screen less frequently, and 14 to continue screening regularly.

Conclusions: We developed a novel conversation aid that supports SDM about mammography screening with women ≥ 75 years. Lessons learned will guide revisions of a final tool for testing in a clinical trial.

为临床医生和75岁及以上妇女之间的共同决策创建乳房x光检查对话辅助。
背景:指南建议初级保健医生(“pcp”)让≥75岁的妇女参与乳房x光检查的共同决策(SDM)。因此,我们的目标是利用已建立的模拟模型的输出,开发一个关于≥75岁女性乳房x光检查的基于网络的对话辅助工具,以提供基于个人女性健康和乳腺癌危险因素的bbb23,000种组合的筛查结果。方法:我们采用以最终用户为中心的设计方法来开发一个基于网络的对话辅助系统原型,并结合反馈。从2023年7月到2024年4月,来自波士顿地区卫生系统和安全网医院的10名pcp在遇到≥75岁无乳腺癌或痴呆的女性时使用了原型辅助设备(n = 30;每PCP 1-5例患者)。我们使用OPTION5(评估SDM的五个组成部分,得分范围为0-100)观察了援助使用情况,并评估了临床医生让患者参与SDM的努力。我们调查了pcp和患者对援助的接受程度。患者完成SDM过程量表(得分范围0-4)来评价所经历的SDM质量。与会者的意见将进行专题分析。结果:10名pcp参与者中,7名女性,4名社区参与者。在30例患者参与者中,22例(73%)为非西班牙裔白人,9例(30%)有≥2例Charlson合并症,平均年龄为78.5岁(SD 2.8)。9个pcp一致认为,该援助有助于他们实现SDM,并且易于使用;六人认为它包含太多信息;还有7个国家计划继续使用援助资金。患者对SDM过程评价很高(评分= 3.0 [SD 0.9]),我们观察到较高的SDM(平均OPTION5 = 77.9 [SD 20.6])。参与者认为援助是“授权”和“有助于决策”。在SDM讨论后,7名患者打算停止筛查,9名患者减少筛查频率,14名患者继续定期筛查。结论:我们开发了一种新的对话辅助工具,支持对≥75岁女性进行乳房x光检查的SDM。吸取的经验教训将指导对临床试验中测试的最终工具进行修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信