Sanjay Kumar, Anghusman Dutta, Srujan Vallur, Ran Singh
{"title":"A Content Analysis of YouTube Videos on Allergic Rhinitis Management.","authors":"Sanjay Kumar, Anghusman Dutta, Srujan Vallur, Ran Singh","doi":"10.1007/s12070-025-05396-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluates the quality, reliability, and usability of YouTube videos on allergic rhinitis (AR) management using validated assessment tools to determine their alignment with evidence-based practices and their potential impact on patient understanding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 50 YouTube videos identified using predefined keywords. Videos were assessed using DISCERN, JAMA, and PEMAT tools for quality, authorship, and usability, respectively. Engagement metrics such as views, likes, and comments were recorded. Videos were categorized by source (medical professionals, influencers, pharmaceutical companies, and alternative therapists) and format (testimonial, educational, promotional). Statistical analyses, including Spearman's correlation and chi-square tests, were performed to explore relationships between video quality and engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and PEMAT scores across all videos were 3.1/5, 2.7/4, and 72%, respectively. Videos by medical professionals scored the highest in quality but had lower engagement, while influencer videos attracted the highest views (mean: 40,000) but scored poorly on quality metrics. Evidence-based treatments were discussed in 72% of videos, yet only 20% mentioned immunotherapy. Misinformation was identified in 36% of videos, with exaggerated claims about \"natural cures\" being the most common theme. A negative correlation was found between DISCERN scores and views (<i>r</i> = -0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.03), indicating that higher-quality videos received fewer views.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube videos on AR management exhibit significant variability in quality and engagement, highlighting a trade-off between reliability and popularity. Enhancing the accessibility and visibility of evidence-based content requires collaboration between medical professionals and content creators. Addressing misinformation and improving patient education through digital platforms is essential for optimizing health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-025-05396-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":49190,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"77 4","pages":"1760-1767"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-025-05396-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluates the quality, reliability, and usability of YouTube videos on allergic rhinitis (AR) management using validated assessment tools to determine their alignment with evidence-based practices and their potential impact on patient understanding.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 50 YouTube videos identified using predefined keywords. Videos were assessed using DISCERN, JAMA, and PEMAT tools for quality, authorship, and usability, respectively. Engagement metrics such as views, likes, and comments were recorded. Videos were categorized by source (medical professionals, influencers, pharmaceutical companies, and alternative therapists) and format (testimonial, educational, promotional). Statistical analyses, including Spearman's correlation and chi-square tests, were performed to explore relationships between video quality and engagement.
Results: The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and PEMAT scores across all videos were 3.1/5, 2.7/4, and 72%, respectively. Videos by medical professionals scored the highest in quality but had lower engagement, while influencer videos attracted the highest views (mean: 40,000) but scored poorly on quality metrics. Evidence-based treatments were discussed in 72% of videos, yet only 20% mentioned immunotherapy. Misinformation was identified in 36% of videos, with exaggerated claims about "natural cures" being the most common theme. A negative correlation was found between DISCERN scores and views (r = -0.42, p = 0.03), indicating that higher-quality videos received fewer views.
Conclusions: YouTube videos on AR management exhibit significant variability in quality and engagement, highlighting a trade-off between reliability and popularity. Enhancing the accessibility and visibility of evidence-based content requires collaboration between medical professionals and content creators. Addressing misinformation and improving patient education through digital platforms is essential for optimizing health outcomes.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-025-05396-6.
期刊介绍：
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery was founded as Indian Journal of Otolaryngology in 1949 as a scientific Journal published by the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and was later rechristened as IJOHNS to incorporate the changes and progress.
IJOHNS, undoubtedly one of the oldest Journals in India, is the official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and is about to publish it is 67th Volume in 2015. The Journal published quarterly accepts articles in general Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and various subspecialities such as Otology, Rhinology, Laryngology and Phonosurgery, Neurotology, Head and Neck Surgery etc.
The Journal acts as a window to showcase and project the clinical and research work done by Otolaryngologists community in India and around the world. It is a continued source of useful clinical information with peer review by eminent Otolaryngologists of repute in their respective fields. The Journal accepts articles pertaining to clinical reports, Clinical studies, Research articles in basic and applied Otolaryngology, short Communications, Clinical records reporting unusual presentations or lesions and new surgical techniques. The journal acts as a catalyst and mirrors the Indian Otolaryngologist’s active interests and pursuits. The Journal also invites articles from senior and experienced authors on interesting topics in Otolaryngology and allied sciences from all over the world.
The print version is distributed free to about 4000 members of Association of Otolaryngologists of India and the e-Journal shortly going to make its appearance on the Springer Board can be accessed by all the members.
Association of Otolaryngologists of India and M/s Springer India group have come together to co-publish IJOHNS from January 2007 and this bondage is going to provide an impetus to the Journal in terms of international presence and global exposure.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
