'What does "remaining living at home" really mean?' Stakeholders' perspectives on everyday difficulties among older people with chronic conditions.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
British Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1177/03080226241306326
Thomas Ballmer, Brigitte Elisabeth Gantschnig
{"title":"'What does \"remaining living at home\" really mean?' Stakeholders' perspectives on everyday difficulties among older people with chronic conditions.","authors":"Thomas Ballmer, Brigitte Elisabeth Gantschnig","doi":"10.1177/03080226241306326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older people with chronic conditions prioritize living arrangements that let them maintain their autonomy. However, many face activity limitations and participation restrictions. Stakeholders involved in their health and social care have a unique perspective on these challenges. The aim of this study was to examine how these stakeholders view the difficulties older people with chronic conditions living at home face in their everyday lives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a qualitative descriptive study based on a focus group interview with eight stakeholders involved in health care, social care and housing for older people with chronic conditions. We transcribed the interview verbatim and analysed it using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We generated four themes: fear of losing autonomy, inequality along socio-economic lines, persisting and new barriers, and 'what does \"remaining living at home\" really mean?'. Participants problematized the lack of awareness among key stakeholders for older people's needs and limited housing options beyond the dichotomous choice between ageing at home and in a care home.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acknowledging diverse factors - fear of losing autonomy, socio-economic situation, limited awareness of key stakeholders, physical and other barriers, societal discourses - shaping older peoples' choices regarding their living arrangements informs how occupational therapists can support them.</p>","PeriodicalId":49096,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"88 5","pages":"292-301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226241306326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older people with chronic conditions prioritize living arrangements that let them maintain their autonomy. However, many face activity limitations and participation restrictions. Stakeholders involved in their health and social care have a unique perspective on these challenges. The aim of this study was to examine how these stakeholders view the difficulties older people with chronic conditions living at home face in their everyday lives.

Method: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study based on a focus group interview with eight stakeholders involved in health care, social care and housing for older people with chronic conditions. We transcribed the interview verbatim and analysed it using thematic analysis.

Findings: We generated four themes: fear of losing autonomy, inequality along socio-economic lines, persisting and new barriers, and 'what does "remaining living at home" really mean?'. Participants problematized the lack of awareness among key stakeholders for older people's needs and limited housing options beyond the dichotomous choice between ageing at home and in a care home.

Conclusion: Acknowledging diverse factors - fear of losing autonomy, socio-economic situation, limited awareness of key stakeholders, physical and other barriers, societal discourses - shaping older peoples' choices regarding their living arrangements informs how occupational therapists can support them.

“‘继续住在家里’到底是什么意思?”利益相关者对慢性病老年人日常困难的看法。
患有慢性疾病的老年人优先考虑让他们保持自主性的生活安排。然而,许多人面临活动限制和参与限制。参与儿童保健和社会保健的利益攸关方对这些挑战有着独特的看法。本研究的目的是研究这些利益相关者如何看待患有慢性疾病的老年人在日常生活中面临的困难。方法:我们在焦点小组访谈的基础上进行了定性描述性研究,访谈涉及慢性病老年人的卫生保健、社会护理和住房的八个利益相关者。我们逐字抄录了采访内容,并用主题分析法进行了分析。研究结果:我们产生了四个主题:对失去自主权的恐惧、社会经济方面的不平等、持续存在的新障碍,以及“留在家里”到底意味着什么?”与会者提出的问题是,主要利益相关者对老年人的需求缺乏认识,住房选择有限,只能选择在家养老和在养老院养老。结论:认识到各种因素——对失去自主权的恐惧、社会经济状况、对关键利益相关者的有限认识、身体和其他障碍、社会话语——影响老年人对生活安排的选择,有助于职业治疗师如何支持他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles with international relevance that advance knowledge in research, practice, education, and management in occupational therapy. It is a monthly peer reviewed publication that disseminates evidence on the effectiveness, benefit, and value of occupational therapy so that occupational therapists, service users, and key stakeholders can make informed decisions. BJOT publishes research articles, reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor and book reviews. It also regularly publishes special issues on topics relevant to occupational therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信