A Pilot Evaluation of the Adequacy of Prenatal Vitamins to Cover Dietary Deficits During Pregnancy and Lactation.

Reproductive, female and child health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1002/rfc2.70012
Chase K Smith, Emily E Fay, Sue L Moreni, Jennie Mao, Mary F Hebert
{"title":"A Pilot Evaluation of the Adequacy of Prenatal Vitamins to Cover Dietary Deficits During Pregnancy and Lactation.","authors":"Chase K Smith, Emily E Fay, Sue L Moreni, Jennie Mao, Mary F Hebert","doi":"10.1002/rfc2.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this pilot survey were (1) to compare dietary intakes during three survey windows (25-28 weeks gestation, 28-32 weeks gestation and ≥ 3 months postpartum) with the National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements' (NIH:ODS) established recommendations for pregnant and lactating women, and (2) to evaluate the general adequacy of commonly used prenatal vitamins (PVs) to cover the identified deficits in dietary intake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this longitudinal pilot survey, 39 healthy consented women, aged 18-50 years with singleton pregnancies and pre-pregnancy BMI < 30.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were included. Items from self-reported dietary intakes during three survey windows were converted to nutritional content using Fooducate (LLC), a public database. Three-day mean intakes per survey window per subject were compared with NIH:ODS recommendations to determine dietary deficits. Eight commonly utilised PVs (identified via web searches of common prenatal vitamins and their availability in local stores) were evaluated for adequacy in correcting each dietary deficit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nutrients that were ≥ 30% higher than the recommended RDA/AI were carbohydrates, sodium, vitamin A, and vitamin C in the first survey window; carbohydrates, sodium, and vitamin A in the second survey window; and sodium and iron in the third survey window. Nutrients that were ≥ 30% <i>lower</i> than the RDA/AI were potassium, vitamin D, and iron in the first survey window; potassium, vitamin D, and iron during the second survey window; and dietary fibre, potassium, vitamin C, and vitamin D in the third survey window. None of the evaluated PVs corrected all deficits, but two were close to the goal and only one corrected all vitamin D deficits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women who are or are planning to become pregnant should be educated on dietary recommendations during pregnancy and lactation, ideally such that supplements become unnecessary. However, it remains good practice to carefully consider prenatal vitamin content before selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":74669,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive, female and child health","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive, female and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfc2.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this pilot survey were (1) to compare dietary intakes during three survey windows (25-28 weeks gestation, 28-32 weeks gestation and ≥ 3 months postpartum) with the National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements' (NIH:ODS) established recommendations for pregnant and lactating women, and (2) to evaluate the general adequacy of commonly used prenatal vitamins (PVs) to cover the identified deficits in dietary intake.

Methods: In this longitudinal pilot survey, 39 healthy consented women, aged 18-50 years with singleton pregnancies and pre-pregnancy BMI < 30.0 kg/m2 were included. Items from self-reported dietary intakes during three survey windows were converted to nutritional content using Fooducate (LLC), a public database. Three-day mean intakes per survey window per subject were compared with NIH:ODS recommendations to determine dietary deficits. Eight commonly utilised PVs (identified via web searches of common prenatal vitamins and their availability in local stores) were evaluated for adequacy in correcting each dietary deficit.

Results: Nutrients that were ≥ 30% higher than the recommended RDA/AI were carbohydrates, sodium, vitamin A, and vitamin C in the first survey window; carbohydrates, sodium, and vitamin A in the second survey window; and sodium and iron in the third survey window. Nutrients that were ≥ 30% lower than the RDA/AI were potassium, vitamin D, and iron in the first survey window; potassium, vitamin D, and iron during the second survey window; and dietary fibre, potassium, vitamin C, and vitamin D in the third survey window. None of the evaluated PVs corrected all deficits, but two were close to the goal and only one corrected all vitamin D deficits.

Conclusion: Women who are or are planning to become pregnant should be educated on dietary recommendations during pregnancy and lactation, ideally such that supplements become unnecessary. However, it remains good practice to carefully consider prenatal vitamin content before selection.

产前维生素充分性的试点评估,以弥补怀孕和哺乳期间的饮食不足。
目的:这项试点调查的目的是:(1)比较三个调查窗口(妊娠25-28周、妊娠28-32周和产后≥3个月)期间的膳食摄入量与美国国立卫生研究院膳食补充剂办公室(NIH:ODS)为孕妇和哺乳期妇女制定的建议,以及(2)评估常用产前维生素(PVs)的总体充足性,以弥补已确定的膳食摄入量不足。方法:在本纵向先导调查中,纳入39名年龄在18-50岁、孕前体重指数< 30.0 kg/m2的健康单胎妊娠女性。在三个调查窗口中,自我报告的饮食摄入量项目通过公共数据库Fooducate (LLC)转换为营养成分。每个调查窗口每个受试者三天平均摄入量比较NIH:ODS建议,以确定饮食不足。评估了八种常用的pv(通过网络搜索常见产前维生素及其在当地商店的可用性来确定)在纠正每种饮食缺陷方面的充足性。结果:在第一个调查窗口,高于推荐RDA/AI≥30%的营养素为碳水化合物、钠、维生素A和维生素C;碳水化合物,钠和维生素A在第二个调查窗口;钠和铁在第三个调查窗口。在第一个调查窗口,低于RDA/AI≥30%的营养素是钾、维生素D和铁;钾,维生素D和铁在第二个调查窗口;膳食纤维,钾,维生素C和维生素D所有评估的pv都没有纠正所有缺陷,但有两个接近目标,只有一个纠正了所有维生素D缺陷。结论:已经怀孕或计划怀孕的女性应该在怀孕和哺乳期间接受饮食建议的教育,理想情况下,补充剂是不必要的。然而,在选择之前仔细考虑产前维生素含量仍然是一个很好的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信