A novel technique for the quality assurance of dwell positions for ovoid applicators using 2D optical imaging.

Jette Borg, Akbar Beiki-Ardakani, Hedi Mohseni, Maryam Golshan, Alexandra Rink, Robert A Weersink
{"title":"A novel technique for the quality assurance of dwell positions for ovoid applicators using 2D optical imaging.","authors":"Jette Borg, Akbar Beiki-Ardakani, Hedi Mohseni, Maryam Golshan, Alexandra Rink, Robert A Weersink","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We propose a new method for commissioning lunar ovoid applicators in high dose rate gynecology brachytherapy based on 2D optical scintillating imaging of the applicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Treatment plans were generated for 22 mm and 26 mm diameter Venezia applicators, using four to eight dwell positions in each ovoid. Images of the applicator dwell positions were acquired using a pinhole apparatus combined with scintillating material and optical camera. Images were acquired for individual dwell positions and processed to identify pixel locations with peak signal intensity. Catheter dwell positions were used to register pixel locations in the optical images and absolute coordinates of the applicator in the treatment planning system. Errors were calculated using the standard deviation in the Euclidean distance between measured and expected ovoid dwell positions. Measurements were repeated three times, including repositioning the applicator on the measurement system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Imaging of each applicator required between 20 and 25 min for all dwell positions. Catheter registration errors were 0.14 ± 0.09 mm and 0.21 ± 0.04 mm for the 26 and 22 mm applicators, respectively. Average differences between the imaged and planned ovoid dwell positions were 0.48 ± 0.14 mm and 0.48 ± 0.16 mm for the 26 and 22 mm applicators, respectively. The maximum difference between the measured and planned ovoid positions was 0.7 mm and 1.3 mm measured for the 26 and 22 mm applicators, respectively. These uncertainties are lower than our clinical tolerance of 2.0 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>2D-Scintillating imaging of lunar ovoid applicator dwell positions is feasible, accurate and faster than previous methods used at our center.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We propose a new method for commissioning lunar ovoid applicators in high dose rate gynecology brachytherapy based on 2D optical scintillating imaging of the applicators.

Methods: Treatment plans were generated for 22 mm and 26 mm diameter Venezia applicators, using four to eight dwell positions in each ovoid. Images of the applicator dwell positions were acquired using a pinhole apparatus combined with scintillating material and optical camera. Images were acquired for individual dwell positions and processed to identify pixel locations with peak signal intensity. Catheter dwell positions were used to register pixel locations in the optical images and absolute coordinates of the applicator in the treatment planning system. Errors were calculated using the standard deviation in the Euclidean distance between measured and expected ovoid dwell positions. Measurements were repeated three times, including repositioning the applicator on the measurement system.

Results: Imaging of each applicator required between 20 and 25 min for all dwell positions. Catheter registration errors were 0.14 ± 0.09 mm and 0.21 ± 0.04 mm for the 26 and 22 mm applicators, respectively. Average differences between the imaged and planned ovoid dwell positions were 0.48 ± 0.14 mm and 0.48 ± 0.16 mm for the 26 and 22 mm applicators, respectively. The maximum difference between the measured and planned ovoid positions was 0.7 mm and 1.3 mm measured for the 26 and 22 mm applicators, respectively. These uncertainties are lower than our clinical tolerance of 2.0 mm.

Conclusions: 2D-Scintillating imaging of lunar ovoid applicator dwell positions is feasible, accurate and faster than previous methods used at our center.

一种利用二维光学成像技术保证卵形涂敷器驻留位置质量的新技术。
目的:提出一种基于卵圆器二维光学闪烁成像的高剂量率妇科近距离放射治疗中卵圆器调试新方法。方法:制作直径为22 mm和26 mm的威氏涂布器的处理方案,每个卵圆形设置4 ~ 8个停留位置。使用结合闪烁材料和光学相机的针孔装置获得涂药器驻留位置的图像。获取每个驻留位置的图像,并处理以识别具有峰值信号强度的像素位置。导管驻留位置用于注册光学图像中的像素位置和治疗计划系统中涂抹器的绝对坐标。误差是用测量的和期望的卵形驻留位置之间的欧氏距离的标准偏差来计算的。测量重复三次,包括在测量系统上重新定位涂抹器。结果:成像每个涂抹器需要20至25分钟的所有停留位置。26 mm和22 mm导管的置管误差分别为0.14±0.09 mm和0.21±0.04 mm。对于26和22 mm的涂抹器,图像和计划卵圆驻留位置的平均差异分别为0.48±0.14 mm和0.48±0.16 mm。测量到的卵圆位置和计划的卵圆位置之间的最大差异分别为0.7 mm和1.3 mm,分别用于26和22 mm的涂抹器。这些不确定度低于我们临床耐受的2.0 mm。结论:与我们中心以往使用的方法相比,月球卵圆器放置位置的2d闪烁成像是可行的,准确的,快速的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信