Effect of different needleless connector technologies on backflow volume in the long peripheral catheter: A bench study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Davide Giustivi, Antonio Gidaro, Elisa Nardin, Silvia Revere, Stefania Fiorini, Nicolò Capsoni, Lucrezia Rovati, Daniele Privitera
{"title":"Effect of different needleless connector technologies on backflow volume in the long peripheral catheter: A bench study.","authors":"Davide Giustivi, Antonio Gidaro, Elisa Nardin, Silvia Revere, Stefania Fiorini, Nicolò Capsoni, Lucrezia Rovati, Daniele Privitera","doi":"10.1177/11297298251336805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The backflow phenomenon represents a challenge when using needleless connectors. This bench study investigated backflow volume (<i>i.e.</i> the quantifiable amount of backflow) into a long peripheral catheter by evaluating needleless connectors with four technologies (positive, negative, neutral, and anti-reflux) and three clamping sequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four different connectors with varying displacement technologies were tested to assess backflow volume using the manufacturer's recommended clamping sequences and a sequence in which the clamp was not foreseen. A high-fidelity experimental model was used. Neutral and anti-reflux needleless connectors were evaluated with varying clamping sequences. The backflow volume values are presented as median and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Backflow was observed in all cases, with a wide range of results: the lowest backflow volume was recorded with the anti-reflux connector, while the highest was recorded with the negative connector, both when no clamp was used. The clamp significantly reduced backflow volume in negative and positive connectors, while no differences were noted between neutral and anti-reflux types across the sequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using only needleless connectors in long peripheral catheters does not prevent the backflow phenomenon. Using clamps significantly reduced the backflow volume in needleless connectors with positive and negative displacement. Neutral and anti-reflux connectors perform similarly in the clamping sequences with and without clamps.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251336805"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251336805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The backflow phenomenon represents a challenge when using needleless connectors. This bench study investigated backflow volume (i.e. the quantifiable amount of backflow) into a long peripheral catheter by evaluating needleless connectors with four technologies (positive, negative, neutral, and anti-reflux) and three clamping sequences.

Methods: Four different connectors with varying displacement technologies were tested to assess backflow volume using the manufacturer's recommended clamping sequences and a sequence in which the clamp was not foreseen. A high-fidelity experimental model was used. Neutral and anti-reflux needleless connectors were evaluated with varying clamping sequences. The backflow volume values are presented as median and interquartile range.

Results: Backflow was observed in all cases, with a wide range of results: the lowest backflow volume was recorded with the anti-reflux connector, while the highest was recorded with the negative connector, both when no clamp was used. The clamp significantly reduced backflow volume in negative and positive connectors, while no differences were noted between neutral and anti-reflux types across the sequences.

Conclusion: Using only needleless connectors in long peripheral catheters does not prevent the backflow phenomenon. Using clamps significantly reduced the backflow volume in needleless connectors with positive and negative displacement. Neutral and anti-reflux connectors perform similarly in the clamping sequences with and without clamps.

不同无针接头技术对长外周导管回流量的影响:一项实验研究。
背景:当使用无针连接器时,回流现象是一个挑战。本实验研究通过评估采用四种技术(阳性、阴性、中性和抗反流)和三种夹紧顺序的无针连接器来研究长外周导管的回流量(即可量化的回流量)。方法:测试了四种不同位移技术的不同连接器,使用制造商推荐的夹紧顺序和未预见的夹紧顺序来评估回流量。采用高保真实验模型。中性和抗反流无针连接器评估不同的夹紧顺序。回流体积值以中位数和四分位数范围表示。结果:在所有病例中都观察到回流,结果范围很广:在不使用夹钳的情况下,反回流连接器记录的回流量最低,而阴性连接器记录的回流量最高。夹紧显著减少了阴性和阳性连接器的回流体积,而中性和抗回流类型之间没有差异。结论:在长外周导管中仅使用无针接头不能防止回流现象。在正位移和负位移的无针接头中,使用夹钳可以显著减少回流体积。中性和抗回流连接器在夹紧序列中具有和不具有夹紧钳的性能相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信