Morgan K Moroi, Alice V Vinogradsky, Amee Shah, Kanwal Farooqi, Oliver Barry, Emile Bacha, David M Kalfa
{"title":"When to Opt for Univentricular versus Biventricular Repair in Complex Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries.","authors":"Morgan K Moroi, Alice V Vinogradsky, Amee Shah, Kanwal Farooqi, Oliver Barry, Emile Bacha, David M Kalfa","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The surgical management of complex congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) remains a subject of ongoing debate due to wide anatomic variability and limited comparative outcomes data. Available strategies include the anatomic repair, physiologic repair, 1.5-ventricular repair, and biventricular repair, each selected based on anatomic severity and the presence of associated lesions. This commentary reviews the existing literature to inform decision-marking between univentricular, 1.5-ventricular, and biventricular repair strategies in complex ccTGA and underscores the need for further comparative studies to guide management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.03.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The surgical management of complex congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) remains a subject of ongoing debate due to wide anatomic variability and limited comparative outcomes data. Available strategies include the anatomic repair, physiologic repair, 1.5-ventricular repair, and biventricular repair, each selected based on anatomic severity and the presence of associated lesions. This commentary reviews the existing literature to inform decision-marking between univentricular, 1.5-ventricular, and biventricular repair strategies in complex ccTGA and underscores the need for further comparative studies to guide management.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.