The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Location and Delivery of Palliative Radiotherapy.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Anthony K Heng, Ted Gooley, Simon S Lo, Jonathan T Yang, Erin F Gillespie, Lia M Halasz, Yolanda D Tseng
{"title":"The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Location and Delivery of Palliative Radiotherapy.","authors":"Anthony K Heng, Ted Gooley, Simon S Lo, Jonathan T Yang, Erin F Gillespie, Lia M Halasz, Yolanda D Tseng","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Among patients that underwent palliative RT (pRT) at a single institution, we evaluated whether differences exist across race and ethnicity in location of pRT consultation and delivery of pRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included cancer patients aged 18 years or older who received pRT between 10/2021 and 10/2022. Logistic regression models were used to examine univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) associations between race and pRT consult in the inpatient (vs. outpatient) setting. A subset analysis of quality metrics for pRT delivery was limited to patients who had outpatient consults for pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred forty patients underwent 548 pRT consults (104 inpatient and 444 outpatient) followed by a course of pRT. Most patients were male (58.2%), White non-Hispanic (WNH) (72.6%), and English-speaking (92.9%). On MVA adjusting for histology, language, and insurance type, consults for Black/African American (BAA) patients had 2.92 higher odds of being performed in the inpatient setting compared with consults for WNH patients (95% CI: 1.28-6.70, P=0.011), although the global P-value was P=0.217. Among 290 outpatient consults for painful lesions, no differences in time to pRT start (global P=0.84), number of prescribed fractions of RT (global P=0.94), or new prescriptions for opioids (global P=0.69) were noted by race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, BAA race was associated with the location of pRT consultation, but no discernible differences were noted regarding the outpatient delivery of pRT for pain. These findings support the importance of inpatient pRT programs to ensure equitable access. More research is needed to understand barriers to outpatient consult.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Among patients that underwent palliative RT (pRT) at a single institution, we evaluated whether differences exist across race and ethnicity in location of pRT consultation and delivery of pRT.

Methods: This retrospective study included cancer patients aged 18 years or older who received pRT between 10/2021 and 10/2022. Logistic regression models were used to examine univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) associations between race and pRT consult in the inpatient (vs. outpatient) setting. A subset analysis of quality metrics for pRT delivery was limited to patients who had outpatient consults for pain.

Results: Four hundred forty patients underwent 548 pRT consults (104 inpatient and 444 outpatient) followed by a course of pRT. Most patients were male (58.2%), White non-Hispanic (WNH) (72.6%), and English-speaking (92.9%). On MVA adjusting for histology, language, and insurance type, consults for Black/African American (BAA) patients had 2.92 higher odds of being performed in the inpatient setting compared with consults for WNH patients (95% CI: 1.28-6.70, P=0.011), although the global P-value was P=0.217. Among 290 outpatient consults for painful lesions, no differences in time to pRT start (global P=0.84), number of prescribed fractions of RT (global P=0.94), or new prescriptions for opioids (global P=0.69) were noted by race and ethnicity.

Conclusions: In this study, BAA race was associated with the location of pRT consultation, but no discernible differences were noted regarding the outpatient delivery of pRT for pain. These findings support the importance of inpatient pRT programs to ensure equitable access. More research is needed to understand barriers to outpatient consult.

种族和民族对姑息性放疗的位置和递送的影响。
目的:在单一机构接受姑息性放射治疗(pRT)的患者中,我们评估在pRT咨询和提供pRT的地点是否存在种族和民族差异。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2021年10月至2022年10月期间接受pRT治疗的18岁及以上的癌症患者。采用Logistic回归模型检验住院患者(与门诊患者相比)种族与pRT会诊之间的单变量(UVA)和多变量(MVA)关联。pRT交付质量指标的子集分析仅限于因疼痛而门诊就诊的患者。结果:440例患者接受了548次pRT咨询(104例住院,444例门诊),并进行了一个疗程的pRT治疗。大多数患者为男性(58.2%),非西班牙裔白人(WNH)(72.6%)和英语(92.9%)。在调整组织学、语言和保险类型的MVA后,与WNH患者相比,黑人/非裔美国人(BAA)患者在住院环境中接受手术的几率高出2.92 (95% CI: 1.28-6.70, P=0.011),尽管总体P值为P=0.217。在290名因疼痛病变就诊的门诊患者中,种族和民族在开始pRT的时间(总体P=0.84)、RT处方分数(总体P=0.94)或阿片类药物新处方(总体P=0.69)方面没有差异。结论:在本研究中,BAA种族与pRT咨询的地点有关,但在门诊提供pRT治疗疼痛方面没有明显差异。这些发现支持了住院pRT项目对确保公平获取的重要性。需要更多的研究来了解门诊咨询的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信