A nomogram to predict the benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer with nodal micrometastases.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1007/s12282-025-01717-3
Zhen-Zhen Lu, Lin-Feng Guo, Juan Zhou, San-Gang Wu
{"title":"A nomogram to predict the benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer with nodal micrometastases.","authors":"Zhen-Zhen Lu, Lin-Feng Guo, Juan Zhou, San-Gang Wu","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01717-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer (BC) with nodal micrometastases (N1mic) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PMRT in T1-2N1mic BC patients who have undergone mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Female patients with T1-2N1mic BC who underwent mastectomy and were registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2017. The chi-square test, logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier methods, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis were used for statistical analyses. Nomograms for predicting breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were created by integrating the independent prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5948 eligible patients were included in this study. A total of 1207 patients (20.3%) received PMRT, while 4741 patients (79.7%) did not. The use of PMRT increased over the study period, from 15.7% in 2010 to 23.8% in 2017 (P < 0.001). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that PMRT did not improve BCSS and OS. Nomograms were established based on the independent prognostic factors to predict the BCSS and CSS of patients. Regarding BCSS, there were 3627 patients (61.0%) classified as low-risk and 2321 patients (39.0%) classified as high-risk using a cutoff point of 125, PMRT did not improve BCSS in patients with low-risk (P = 0.697) and high-risk (P = 0.149) groups. Regarding OS, there were 4791 patients (80.5%) classified as low-risk and 1157 patients (19.5%) classified as high-risk using a cutoff point of 130, patients who received PMRT had significantly better 5-year OS than those who did not receive PMRT (P = 0.047), while similar outcomes were found between the treatment arms in the low-risk group (P = 0.575).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While our findings suggest that PMRT does not enhance survival outcomes in T1-T2N1mic BC patients, it may offer a survival advantage in high-risk subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"935-946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01717-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer (BC) with nodal micrometastases (N1mic) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PMRT in T1-2N1mic BC patients who have undergone mastectomy.

Methods: Female patients with T1-2N1mic BC who underwent mastectomy and were registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2017. The chi-square test, logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier methods, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis were used for statistical analyses. Nomograms for predicting breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were created by integrating the independent prognostic factors.

Results: A total of 5948 eligible patients were included in this study. A total of 1207 patients (20.3%) received PMRT, while 4741 patients (79.7%) did not. The use of PMRT increased over the study period, from 15.7% in 2010 to 23.8% in 2017 (P < 0.001). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that PMRT did not improve BCSS and OS. Nomograms were established based on the independent prognostic factors to predict the BCSS and CSS of patients. Regarding BCSS, there were 3627 patients (61.0%) classified as low-risk and 2321 patients (39.0%) classified as high-risk using a cutoff point of 125, PMRT did not improve BCSS in patients with low-risk (P = 0.697) and high-risk (P = 0.149) groups. Regarding OS, there were 4791 patients (80.5%) classified as low-risk and 1157 patients (19.5%) classified as high-risk using a cutoff point of 130, patients who received PMRT had significantly better 5-year OS than those who did not receive PMRT (P = 0.047), while similar outcomes were found between the treatment arms in the low-risk group (P = 0.575).

Conclusions: While our findings suggest that PMRT does not enhance survival outcomes in T1-T2N1mic BC patients, it may offer a survival advantage in high-risk subgroups.

一种预测乳房切除术后放疗对伴有淋巴结微转移的乳腺癌的益处的线图。
背景:乳房切除术后放疗(PMRT)在伴有淋巴结微转移(N1mic)的乳腺癌(BC)中的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估PMRT在接受乳房切除术的T1-2N1mic BC患者中的疗效。方法:2010年至2017年期间,接受乳房切除术的T1-2N1mic型女性BC患者在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中登记。采用卡方检验、logistic回归分析、Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox比例风险分析进行统计分析。综合独立预后因素,生成预测乳腺癌特异性生存期(BCSS)和总生存期(OS)的nomogram。结果:本研究共纳入5948例符合条件的患者。1207例(20.3%)患者接受了PMRT治疗,4741例(79.7%)患者未接受PMRT治疗。PMRT的使用在研究期间有所增加,从2010年的15.7%增加到2017年的23.8% (P结论:尽管我们的研究结果表明PMRT并不能提高T1-T2N1mic BC患者的生存结果,但它可能在高风险亚组中提供生存优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信