Gender differences in variability of intimate relationship satisfaction in a multinational sample.

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Family Psychology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1037/fam0001349
Mark A Whisman, Ashley K Randall, Piotr Sorokowski
{"title":"Gender differences in variability of intimate relationship satisfaction in a multinational sample.","authors":"Mark A Whisman, Ashley K Randall, Piotr Sorokowski","doi":"10.1037/fam0001349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate potential gender differences in relationship satisfaction between women and men, researchers have generally focused on gender differences in mean levels of relationship satisfaction. In comparison, the present study was conducted to evaluate gender differences in the distribution (i.e., variability) of relationship satisfaction scores by examining (a) variance ratios (i.e., variance of women's relationship satisfaction scores divided by men's scores) and (b) tail ratios (i.e., ratio of the relative proportion of women divided by the relative proportion of men in the distributional tail regions). Results from a large, multinational sample of married individuals recruited from 33 countries (<i>N</i> = 7,178) spanning five continents indicated that compared to men, (a) women reported greater variability in relationship satisfaction (variance ratio = 1.25) and (b) women predominated in the lower tail of the distribution of relationship satisfaction scores. These results support the greater female variability hypothesis of relationship satisfaction and underscore the need for research to better understand why compared to men, women's relationship satisfaction scores show greater variability or dispersion at lower levels of satisfaction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"548-553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate potential gender differences in relationship satisfaction between women and men, researchers have generally focused on gender differences in mean levels of relationship satisfaction. In comparison, the present study was conducted to evaluate gender differences in the distribution (i.e., variability) of relationship satisfaction scores by examining (a) variance ratios (i.e., variance of women's relationship satisfaction scores divided by men's scores) and (b) tail ratios (i.e., ratio of the relative proportion of women divided by the relative proportion of men in the distributional tail regions). Results from a large, multinational sample of married individuals recruited from 33 countries (N = 7,178) spanning five continents indicated that compared to men, (a) women reported greater variability in relationship satisfaction (variance ratio = 1.25) and (b) women predominated in the lower tail of the distribution of relationship satisfaction scores. These results support the greater female variability hypothesis of relationship satisfaction and underscore the need for research to better understand why compared to men, women's relationship satisfaction scores show greater variability or dispersion at lower levels of satisfaction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

跨国样本中亲密关系满意度变异性的性别差异。
为了评估男女关系满意度的潜在性别差异,研究人员通常关注关系满意度平均水平的性别差异。相比之下,本研究通过检验(a)方差比(即女性关系满意度分数除以男性分数的方差)和(b)尾部比(即分布尾部区域中女性相对比例除以男性相对比例的比例)来评估关系满意度分数分布(即可变性)中的性别差异。从横跨五大洲的33个国家(N = 7178)招募的已婚个体的大型跨国样本的结果表明,与男性相比,(a)女性在关系满意度方面报告了更大的可变性(方差比= 1.25),(b)女性在关系满意度得分分布的下尾占主导地位。这些结果支持了关系满意度的女性变异性假说,并强调了研究的必要性,以更好地理解为什么与男性相比,女性的关系满意度得分在较低的满意度水平上表现出更大的变异性或分散性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信