Leveraging inter-organizational networks to scale up a sepsis recovery program: results from an application of the Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI) method.

Cheyenne R Wagi, Marc A Kowalkowski, Stephanie P Taylor, Aliza Randazzo, Asha Ganesan, Amit Khanal, Sarah A Birken
{"title":"Leveraging inter-organizational networks to scale up a sepsis recovery program: results from an application of the Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI) method.","authors":"Cheyenne R Wagi, Marc A Kowalkowski, Stephanie P Taylor, Aliza Randazzo, Asha Ganesan, Amit Khanal, Sarah A Birken","doi":"10.1186/s43058-025-00743-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nearly two million adults in the United States are hospitalized with sepsis yearly, with survivors facing complications that result in high rates of hospital readmission and mortality after discharge. We demonstrated improved outcomes following discharge among sepsis survivors who participated in the Sepsis Transition And Recovery (STAR) program; however, important differences among hospitals require STAR's adaptation to facilitate its implementation and ensure its effectiveness in new settings.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to adapt STAR to hospitals with diverse characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI) approach. We identified STAR core functions (i.e., effectiveness-driving features) using semi-structured key informant interviews (n = 7). We identified adaptations using semi-structured interviews with clinicians and leaders with expertise and oversight of resources related to transitions of care after sepsis hospitalization (n = 7) from four hospitals that systematically differed from the hospitals in which we originally found STAR to be effective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Network theory, which proposes that performance improves with more efficient flow of information within and across hospitals, underlays STAR's eleven core functions. Adaptation included specific points-of-contact, communication preferences, and methods for achieving buy-in. We used proposed adaptations to tailor STAR protocols to each hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We used MODIFI, a state-of-the-science method, to adapt a program that was effective in promoting transition and recovery in sepsis survivors to facilitate its scale-up to diverse hospitals. Future studies will assess STAR's implementation and effectiveness in diverse hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00743-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nearly two million adults in the United States are hospitalized with sepsis yearly, with survivors facing complications that result in high rates of hospital readmission and mortality after discharge. We demonstrated improved outcomes following discharge among sepsis survivors who participated in the Sepsis Transition And Recovery (STAR) program; however, important differences among hospitals require STAR's adaptation to facilitate its implementation and ensure its effectiveness in new settings.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to adapt STAR to hospitals with diverse characteristics.

Methods: We used the Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI) approach. We identified STAR core functions (i.e., effectiveness-driving features) using semi-structured key informant interviews (n = 7). We identified adaptations using semi-structured interviews with clinicians and leaders with expertise and oversight of resources related to transitions of care after sepsis hospitalization (n = 7) from four hospitals that systematically differed from the hospitals in which we originally found STAR to be effective.

Results: Network theory, which proposes that performance improves with more efficient flow of information within and across hospitals, underlays STAR's eleven core functions. Adaptation included specific points-of-contact, communication preferences, and methods for achieving buy-in. We used proposed adaptations to tailor STAR protocols to each hospital.

Conclusions: We used MODIFI, a state-of-the-science method, to adapt a program that was effective in promoting transition and recovery in sepsis survivors to facilitate its scale-up to diverse hospitals. Future studies will assess STAR's implementation and effectiveness in diverse hospitals.

利用组织间网络扩大败血症恢复计划:实施过程中干预灵活性做出最佳决策(MODIFI)方法应用的结果。
背景:美国每年有近200万成年人因败血症住院,幸存者面临并发症,导致出院后再入院率和死亡率很高。我们证明了参与脓毒症过渡和恢复(STAR)项目的脓毒症幸存者出院后的预后改善;然而,医院之间的重大差异要求对STAR进行调整,以促进其实施并确保其在新环境中的有效性。目的:本研究的目的是使STAR适应不同特点的医院。方法:采用modfi (Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility in Implementation)方法。我们使用半结构化的关键信息提供者访谈(n = 7)确定了STAR的核心功能(即有效性驱动特征)。我们通过与四家医院(n = 7)的临床医生和领导进行半结构化访谈来确定适应性,这些医院与我们最初发现STAR有效的医院有系统差异,他们具有败血症住院后护理过渡相关的专业知识和资源监督。结果:网络理论提出,绩效随着医院内部和医院之间更有效的信息流而提高,这是STAR的11个核心功能的基础。适应包括具体的接触点、沟通偏好和实现认同的方法。我们使用建议的适应性来为每家医院量身定制STAR协议。结论:我们使用MODIFI(一种最先进的科学方法)来调整一个有效促进脓毒症幸存者过渡和康复的项目,以促进其在不同医院的推广。未来的研究将评估STAR在不同医院的实施和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信