Person-centred care as an evolving field of research: a scoping review.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1534178
Emma Forsgren, Caroline Feldthusen, Sara Wallström, Lovisa Thunström, Lars Kullman, Richard Sawatzky, Joakim Öhlén
{"title":"Person-centred care as an evolving field of research: a scoping review.","authors":"Emma Forsgren, Caroline Feldthusen, Sara Wallström, Lovisa Thunström, Lars Kullman, Richard Sawatzky, Joakim Öhlén","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1534178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Changes in policy towards a healthcare approach viewing patients as persons provide calls for person-centred healthcare practices. The objective of this scoping review was to present an overview of the international literature on PCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Database-specific search string including index terms and free text words related to PCC were constructed to identify relevant literature indexed in PubMed, Scopus, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science. Two different methods of combined manual and computer-assisted screening were applied to identify citations to be included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1,351 publications were included, whereof theoretical and empirical studies were most prevalent in the sample. For the latter, the most common setting was hospital care. The study population was most often health professionals or patients. The most frequently used term was patient-centred, followed by person-centred and family-centred. Research from six continents was included. An exploration of collaborations and research clusters has revealed several clusters.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review provides a snapshot of the literature on PCC. The lack of clarity in terminology presents barriers to comprehensively overviewing the vast amount of available research within the field, which in turn presents challenges for research-based policy and practice development.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1534178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1534178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Changes in policy towards a healthcare approach viewing patients as persons provide calls for person-centred healthcare practices. The objective of this scoping review was to present an overview of the international literature on PCC.

Methods: Database-specific search string including index terms and free text words related to PCC were constructed to identify relevant literature indexed in PubMed, Scopus, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science. Two different methods of combined manual and computer-assisted screening were applied to identify citations to be included in the review.

Results: In total, 1,351 publications were included, whereof theoretical and empirical studies were most prevalent in the sample. For the latter, the most common setting was hospital care. The study population was most often health professionals or patients. The most frequently used term was patient-centred, followed by person-centred and family-centred. Research from six continents was included. An exploration of collaborations and research clusters has revealed several clusters.

Discussion: This review provides a snapshot of the literature on PCC. The lack of clarity in terminology presents barriers to comprehensively overviewing the vast amount of available research within the field, which in turn presents challenges for research-based policy and practice development.

以人为本的护理作为一个不断发展的研究领域:范围审查。
导言:将患者视为人的医疗保健方法的政策变化要求以人为本的医疗保健实践。本次范围审查的目的是对PCC的国际文献进行概述。方法:构建与PCC相关的索引词和自由文本词的数据库专用检索字符串,在PubMed、Scopus、PsychINFO、CINAHL和Web of Science中检索PCC相关文献。采用人工和计算机辅助筛选两种不同的方法来确定纳入综述的引文。结果:共纳入文献1351篇,其中理论研究和实证研究在样本中最为普遍。对于后者,最常见的环境是医院护理。研究人群通常是卫生专业人员或患者。最常用的术语是“以病人为中心”,其次是“以人为中心”和“以家庭为中心”。包括来自六大洲的研究。对合作和研究集群的探索揭示了几个集群。讨论:这篇综述提供了关于PCC的文献综述。术语缺乏明确性对全面概述该领域内大量现有研究构成了障碍,这反过来又对基于研究的政策和实践发展提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信