Emma M Marshall, Anat Cossen, David Skvarc, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Marilla L Druitt, Subhadra Evans
{"title":"Pain-related support seeking? Situating the response to pain within the social context using a sample of women experiencing menstrual pain.","authors":"Emma M Marshall, Anat Cossen, David Skvarc, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Marilla L Druitt, Subhadra Evans","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00569-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study explored whether \"pain catastrophizing\" in a sample of women experiencing menstrual pain can change over time as a function of perceived social support. All participants were cisgender women aged between 18 and 50 years of age, residing in Australia, and who had experienced menstruation within the past year. Participants completed two online surveys approximately 1-year apart, and participants were included if they indicated some degree of menstrual pain at baseline (Time 1, T1) (N = 2006 at T1 and N = 487 at T2). A significant negative association was found between perceived social support (T1) and pain catastrophizing (T2), when reports of pain catastrophizing at T1 were controlled for. This remained significant when the model was adjusted for the potential confounders: age, menstrual pain level, and endometriosis diagnosis (all assessed at T1). These findings demonstrate how \"pain catastrophizing\" in women with menstrual pain is, at least in part, a function of the broader social environment. This suggests that \"pain catastrophizing\" might be a well-intentioned and understandable pain-related support seeking strategy that manifests in response to a lack of adequate social support. It might be beneficial for psychological interventions to consider people's social network to ensure that they are able to get the support that they need.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00569-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current study explored whether "pain catastrophizing" in a sample of women experiencing menstrual pain can change over time as a function of perceived social support. All participants were cisgender women aged between 18 and 50 years of age, residing in Australia, and who had experienced menstruation within the past year. Participants completed two online surveys approximately 1-year apart, and participants were included if they indicated some degree of menstrual pain at baseline (Time 1, T1) (N = 2006 at T1 and N = 487 at T2). A significant negative association was found between perceived social support (T1) and pain catastrophizing (T2), when reports of pain catastrophizing at T1 were controlled for. This remained significant when the model was adjusted for the potential confounders: age, menstrual pain level, and endometriosis diagnosis (all assessed at T1). These findings demonstrate how "pain catastrophizing" in women with menstrual pain is, at least in part, a function of the broader social environment. This suggests that "pain catastrophizing" might be a well-intentioned and understandable pain-related support seeking strategy that manifests in response to a lack of adequate social support. It might be beneficial for psychological interventions to consider people's social network to ensure that they are able to get the support that they need.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders. Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.