The Conceptualization of Health Care Resilience: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Erin J Ward, Craig S Webster
{"title":"The Conceptualization of Health Care Resilience: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Erin J Ward, Craig S Webster","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In recent years, health care resilience has garnered increased attention, particularly since COVID-19. Resilience in health care is commonly framed across four interconnected levels: individual, team, organisational, and systemic. While individual-level resilience is relatively well explored, conceptualisations at other levels remain poorly defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review exploring conceptualisations of health care resilience outside of the individual-level using systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3734 initial records, 58 met our criteria. Of these, 7 (12.1%) articles did not explicitly define resilience. System-level resilience was the most explored (n=38, 65.5%), followed by organisational (n=12, 20.7%), and cross-level studies (n=8, 13.8%), with no studies exclusively focusing on team-level resilience. Conceptualisations of resilience revealed 5 themes: the goal of resilience; what systems are resilient to; resilience characteristics; its classification as ability, capacity, or capability; and the temporal dimension of resilience. Notably, no distinct patterns emerged specific to a conceptual level, suggesting resilience can be conceptualised across team, organisation, and system levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore significant diversity in resilience definitions, indicating an evolving health care resilience paradigm. On the basis of these insights, we propose the following definition, applicable across all levels: health care resilience is the ability to anticipate, absorb, adapt or transform in response to everyday pressures, threats and opportunities to maintain efficient, high quality, and safe performance. A shared understanding of health care resilience would promote the critical imperative for research to bolster health care recovery post-COVID-19 and to prepare for future disruptive events.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In recent years, health care resilience has garnered increased attention, particularly since COVID-19. Resilience in health care is commonly framed across four interconnected levels: individual, team, organisational, and systemic. While individual-level resilience is relatively well explored, conceptualisations at other levels remain poorly defined.

Methods: To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review exploring conceptualisations of health care resilience outside of the individual-level using systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar.

Results: From 3734 initial records, 58 met our criteria. Of these, 7 (12.1%) articles did not explicitly define resilience. System-level resilience was the most explored (n=38, 65.5%), followed by organisational (n=12, 20.7%), and cross-level studies (n=8, 13.8%), with no studies exclusively focusing on team-level resilience. Conceptualisations of resilience revealed 5 themes: the goal of resilience; what systems are resilient to; resilience characteristics; its classification as ability, capacity, or capability; and the temporal dimension of resilience. Notably, no distinct patterns emerged specific to a conceptual level, suggesting resilience can be conceptualised across team, organisation, and system levels.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore significant diversity in resilience definitions, indicating an evolving health care resilience paradigm. On the basis of these insights, we propose the following definition, applicable across all levels: health care resilience is the ability to anticipate, absorb, adapt or transform in response to everyday pressures, threats and opportunities to maintain efficient, high quality, and safe performance. A shared understanding of health care resilience would promote the critical imperative for research to bolster health care recovery post-COVID-19 and to prepare for future disruptive events.

卫生保健弹性的概念化:一个范围审查。
目标:近年来,特别是自2019冠状病毒病以来,卫生保健复原力受到越来越多的关注。医疗保健的弹性通常分为四个相互关联的层面:个人、团队、组织和系统。虽然个人层面的弹性得到了相对较好的探索,但其他层面的概念仍然模糊不清。方法:为了解决这一差距,我们进行了一项范围综述,利用MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO和谷歌Scholar的系统搜索,探索了个人层面之外的卫生保健弹性的概念。结果:3734条初始记录中,58条符合我们的标准。其中,7篇(12.1%)文章没有明确定义弹性。系统层面的弹性研究最多(n=38, 65.5%),其次是组织(n=12, 20.7%)和跨层面的研究(n=8, 13.8%),没有研究专门关注团队层面的弹性。弹性的概念化揭示了五个主题:弹性的目标;什么系统是有弹性的;弹性特征;其分类为能力、能力或能力;以及弹性的时间维度。值得注意的是,没有出现特定于概念级别的独特模式,这表明弹性可以跨团队、组织和系统级别概念化。结论:我们的研究结果强调了弹性定义的显著多样性,表明医疗保健弹性范式正在演变。在这些见解的基础上,我们提出了以下适用于所有层面的定义:医疗保健弹性是预测、吸收、适应或转变日常压力、威胁和机会的能力,以保持高效、高质量和安全的绩效。对卫生保健复原力的共同理解将促进至关重要的研究,以加强covid -19后的卫生保健恢复,并为未来的破坏性事件做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信