Advancing organizational mindfulness in nursing: Bridging the theory-implementation gap.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000443
Tmira Hefetz, Anat Drach-Zahavy
{"title":"Advancing organizational mindfulness in nursing: Bridging the theory-implementation gap.","authors":"Tmira Hefetz, Anat Drach-Zahavy","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to organizational mindfulness (OM) theory, teams must constantly anticipate and recover from unforeseen events by avoiding oversimplified explanations, being attuned to operational details, maintaining commitment to resilience, engaging in preoccupation with failure, and prioritizing expertise in problem solving. Despite its merits, the assimilation of OM theory into health care systems remains challenging, as fundamental practices and procedures within these systems often conflict with the core principles of OM, leading to an implementation gap.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We begin by emphasizing why health care professionals, particularly nurses, are not yet ready for and even resistant to OM. Although OM is intensely patient focused and enables nurses to practice in alignment with the ideals of nursing, they may be reluctant to embrace it due to the burden it places on them without adequate resources.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We argue that readiness for change (RFC) theory offers valuable insights into addressing this challenge by identifying and mitigating barriers to change. We combine research on OM with the RFC model to conceptualize how to systematically integrate OM into health care settings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Conceptually integrating RFC and OM frameworks can aid in narrowing the OM theory-implementation gap. To advance the field further, OM scholars should focus on better operationalizing OM principles, designing interventions to implement OM, and assessing their effectiveness with longitudinal designs and identify contextual boundary conditions for OM effective implementation. Moreover, we describe how leaders can support OM and RFC while managing resource constraints and supporting overwhelmed health care workers.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>We distill our analysis into the 6-Step Road Map, suggesting evidence-based strategies for health care policymakers, administrators, and managers aiming to implement OM.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":"250-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to organizational mindfulness (OM) theory, teams must constantly anticipate and recover from unforeseen events by avoiding oversimplified explanations, being attuned to operational details, maintaining commitment to resilience, engaging in preoccupation with failure, and prioritizing expertise in problem solving. Despite its merits, the assimilation of OM theory into health care systems remains challenging, as fundamental practices and procedures within these systems often conflict with the core principles of OM, leading to an implementation gap.

Purpose: We begin by emphasizing why health care professionals, particularly nurses, are not yet ready for and even resistant to OM. Although OM is intensely patient focused and enables nurses to practice in alignment with the ideals of nursing, they may be reluctant to embrace it due to the burden it places on them without adequate resources.

Methodology: We argue that readiness for change (RFC) theory offers valuable insights into addressing this challenge by identifying and mitigating barriers to change. We combine research on OM with the RFC model to conceptualize how to systematically integrate OM into health care settings.

Findings: Conceptually integrating RFC and OM frameworks can aid in narrowing the OM theory-implementation gap. To advance the field further, OM scholars should focus on better operationalizing OM principles, designing interventions to implement OM, and assessing their effectiveness with longitudinal designs and identify contextual boundary conditions for OM effective implementation. Moreover, we describe how leaders can support OM and RFC while managing resource constraints and supporting overwhelmed health care workers.

Practice implications: We distill our analysis into the 6-Step Road Map, suggesting evidence-based strategies for health care policymakers, administrators, and managers aiming to implement OM.

推进护理组织正念:弥合理论与实施的差距。
背景:根据组织正念(OM)理论,团队必须通过避免过度简化的解释、协调操作细节、保持对弹性的承诺、专注于失败、优先考虑解决问题的专业知识,不断预测和从不可预见的事件中恢复过来。尽管OM理论有其优点,但将其融入卫生保健系统仍然具有挑战性,因为这些系统中的基本实践和程序往往与OM的核心原则相冲突,导致实施差距。目的:我们首先强调为什么卫生保健专业人员,特别是护士,还没有准备好,甚至抵制OM。尽管OM以病人为中心,使护士能够按照护理的理想进行实践,但由于没有足够的资源,他们可能不愿意接受它,因为它给他们带来了负担。方法论:我们认为,变革准备(RFC)理论通过识别和减轻变革障碍,为解决这一挑战提供了有价值的见解。我们将OM的研究与RFC模型相结合,以概念化如何系统地将OM整合到医疗保健环境中。从概念上整合RFC和OM框架有助于缩小OM理论与实现的差距。为了进一步推动这一领域的发展,OM学者应该专注于更好地实施OM原则,设计实施OM的干预措施,并通过纵向设计评估其有效性,并确定有效实施OM的上下文边界条件。此外,我们描述了领导者如何在管理资源限制和支持不堪重负的卫生保健工作者的同时支持OM和RFC。实践启示:我们将我们的分析提炼成6步路线图,为旨在实施OM的卫生保健政策制定者、管理者和管理人员提出基于证据的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信