{"title":"Advancing organizational mindfulness in nursing: Bridging the theory-implementation gap.","authors":"Tmira Hefetz, Anat Drach-Zahavy","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to organizational mindfulness (OM) theory, teams must constantly anticipate and recover from unforeseen events by avoiding oversimplified explanations, being attuned to operational details, maintaining commitment to resilience, engaging in preoccupation with failure, and prioritizing expertise in problem solving. Despite its merits, the assimilation of OM theory into health care systems remains challenging, as fundamental practices and procedures within these systems often conflict with the core principles of OM, leading to an implementation gap.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We begin by emphasizing why health care professionals, particularly nurses, are not yet ready for and even resistant to OM. Although OM is intensely patient focused and enables nurses to practice in alignment with the ideals of nursing, they may be reluctant to embrace it due to the burden it places on them without adequate resources.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We argue that readiness for change (RFC) theory offers valuable insights into addressing this challenge by identifying and mitigating barriers to change. We combine research on OM with the RFC model to conceptualize how to systematically integrate OM into health care settings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Conceptually integrating RFC and OM frameworks can aid in narrowing the OM theory-implementation gap. To advance the field further, OM scholars should focus on better operationalizing OM principles, designing interventions to implement OM, and assessing their effectiveness with longitudinal designs and identify contextual boundary conditions for OM effective implementation. Moreover, we describe how leaders can support OM and RFC while managing resource constraints and supporting overwhelmed health care workers.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>We distill our analysis into the 6-Step Road Map, suggesting evidence-based strategies for health care policymakers, administrators, and managers aiming to implement OM.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":"250-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: According to organizational mindfulness (OM) theory, teams must constantly anticipate and recover from unforeseen events by avoiding oversimplified explanations, being attuned to operational details, maintaining commitment to resilience, engaging in preoccupation with failure, and prioritizing expertise in problem solving. Despite its merits, the assimilation of OM theory into health care systems remains challenging, as fundamental practices and procedures within these systems often conflict with the core principles of OM, leading to an implementation gap.
Purpose: We begin by emphasizing why health care professionals, particularly nurses, are not yet ready for and even resistant to OM. Although OM is intensely patient focused and enables nurses to practice in alignment with the ideals of nursing, they may be reluctant to embrace it due to the burden it places on them without adequate resources.
Methodology: We argue that readiness for change (RFC) theory offers valuable insights into addressing this challenge by identifying and mitigating barriers to change. We combine research on OM with the RFC model to conceptualize how to systematically integrate OM into health care settings.
Findings: Conceptually integrating RFC and OM frameworks can aid in narrowing the OM theory-implementation gap. To advance the field further, OM scholars should focus on better operationalizing OM principles, designing interventions to implement OM, and assessing their effectiveness with longitudinal designs and identify contextual boundary conditions for OM effective implementation. Moreover, we describe how leaders can support OM and RFC while managing resource constraints and supporting overwhelmed health care workers.
Practice implications: We distill our analysis into the 6-Step Road Map, suggesting evidence-based strategies for health care policymakers, administrators, and managers aiming to implement OM.
期刊介绍:
Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.