A Split Renal Function-Based Approach for Predicting New Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate After Radical Nephroureterectomy.

IF 1.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000826
Kieran Lewis, Jayant Siva, Angelica Bartholomew, Anne Wong, Carlos Munoz Lopez, Akira Kazama, Nityam Rathi, Eran N Maina, Rebecca A Campbell, Nicholas Heller, Jason M Scovell, Robert Abouassaly, Nima Almassi, Samuel C Haywood, Christopher J Weight, Steven C Campbell
{"title":"A Split Renal Function-Based Approach for Predicting New Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate After Radical Nephroureterectomy.","authors":"Kieran Lewis, Jayant Siva, Angelica Bartholomew, Anne Wong, Carlos Munoz Lopez, Akira Kazama, Nityam Rathi, Eran N Maina, Rebecca A Campbell, Nicholas Heller, Jason M Scovell, Robert Abouassaly, Nima Almassi, Samuel C Haywood, Christopher J Weight, Steven C Campbell","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate prediction of new baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is important for managing upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) because it can inform timing of systemic chemotherapy. Current prediction models do not account for split renal function (SRF) and show modest accuracy. This study evaluates the accuracy of an SRF-based model, PVA<sup>+</sup>, which incorporates both parenchymal volume analysis (PVA) and degree of parenchymal enhancement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed patients with UTUC (n = 712) managed with RNU (2013-2023) and included patients with (1) contrast-enhanced CT < 1 year preoperatively, (2) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 3 months preoperatively, and (3) NBGFR 1 to 12 months postoperatively. Predicted NBGFR was 1.25 × (GFR<sub>PreRNU</sub>) × (SRF<sub>Contralateral</sub>), with 1.25 representing the average renal functional compensation after nephrectomy. For PVA<sup>+</sup>, differential parenchymal volumes and degree of enhancement were estimated using semiautomated software. SRF-based models (based on PVA<sup>+</sup>, PVA alone, or nuclear renal scans) and a non-SRF-based algorithm were compared using a 20% accuracy threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients analyzed (n = 352), the median preoperative GFR was 63 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 101 (29%) had moderate/severe hydronephrosis, and 42 (12%) had infiltrative renal masses (IRMs). For prediction of NBGFR after RNU, PVA<sup>+</sup> demonstrated superior accuracy (84%) compared with PVA alone (accuracy = 79%, <i>P</i> < .05), nuclear renal scans-based approach (accuracy = 73%, <i>P</i> < .01), and non-SRF-based algorithm (accuracy = 65%, <i>P</i> < .01). Among patients with hydronephrosis, notable improvements were observed for PVA<sup>+</sup> compared with PVA alone (accuracies 88%/61%, respectively, <i>P</i> ≤ .01). For IRMs, PVA<sup>+</sup> seemed to be equivalent to other approaches for predicting NBGFR after RNU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PVA<sup>+</sup> incorporates both differential renal function (degree of enhancement) and parenchymal volumes and outperforms other SRF-based and non-SRF-based approaches for predicting NBGFR after RNU. These findings alleviate concerns that the prevalence of hydronephrosis and IRMs in this population reduces accuracy of SRF-based approaches. PVA<sup>+</sup> can inform counseling about the timing of systemic chemotherapy in patients with high-risk UTUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"557-567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate prediction of new baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is important for managing upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) because it can inform timing of systemic chemotherapy. Current prediction models do not account for split renal function (SRF) and show modest accuracy. This study evaluates the accuracy of an SRF-based model, PVA+, which incorporates both parenchymal volume analysis (PVA) and degree of parenchymal enhancement.

Methods: We reviewed patients with UTUC (n = 712) managed with RNU (2013-2023) and included patients with (1) contrast-enhanced CT < 1 year preoperatively, (2) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 3 months preoperatively, and (3) NBGFR 1 to 12 months postoperatively. Predicted NBGFR was 1.25 × (GFRPreRNU) × (SRFContralateral), with 1.25 representing the average renal functional compensation after nephrectomy. For PVA+, differential parenchymal volumes and degree of enhancement were estimated using semiautomated software. SRF-based models (based on PVA+, PVA alone, or nuclear renal scans) and a non-SRF-based algorithm were compared using a 20% accuracy threshold.

Results: Among patients analyzed (n = 352), the median preoperative GFR was 63 mL/min/1.73 m2, 101 (29%) had moderate/severe hydronephrosis, and 42 (12%) had infiltrative renal masses (IRMs). For prediction of NBGFR after RNU, PVA+ demonstrated superior accuracy (84%) compared with PVA alone (accuracy = 79%, P < .05), nuclear renal scans-based approach (accuracy = 73%, P < .01), and non-SRF-based algorithm (accuracy = 65%, P < .01). Among patients with hydronephrosis, notable improvements were observed for PVA+ compared with PVA alone (accuracies 88%/61%, respectively, P ≤ .01). For IRMs, PVA+ seemed to be equivalent to other approaches for predicting NBGFR after RNU.

Conclusions: PVA+ incorporates both differential renal function (degree of enhancement) and parenchymal volumes and outperforms other SRF-based and non-SRF-based approaches for predicting NBGFR after RNU. These findings alleviate concerns that the prevalence of hydronephrosis and IRMs in this population reduces accuracy of SRF-based approaches. PVA+ can inform counseling about the timing of systemic chemotherapy in patients with high-risk UTUC.

基于分裂肾功能的方法预测根治性肾输尿管切除术后新基线GFR。
导读:根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)后新基线GFR(NBGFR)的准确预测对于治疗上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)非常重要,因为它可以告知全身化疗的时机。目前的预测模型没有考虑到肾功能分裂(SRF),显示出适度的准确性。该研究评估了基于srf的PVA+模型的准确性,该模型结合了实质体积分析(PVA)和实质增强程度。方法:我们回顾了2013-2023年接受RNU治疗的UTUC患者(n=712),其中包括:1)对比增强CT PreRNU ×(srf对侧),1.25代表肾切除术后平均肾功能代偿。对于PVA+,使用半自动软件估计差异实质体积和增强程度。基于srf的模型(基于PVA+、单独PVA或核肾扫描(NRS))和非基于srf的算法,使用20%的准确率阈值进行比较。结果:在分析的患者中(n=352),术前GFR中位数为63ml/min/1.73m2, 101例(29%)为中度/重度肾积水,42例(12%)为浸润性肾块(IRM)。对于RNU术后NBGFR的预测,PVA+比PVA单独预测准确率更高(84%)(准确率=79%,p+比PVA单独预测准确率分别为88%/61%,p≤0.01)。对于IRM, PVA+似乎与其他预测rnu后NBGFR的方法相同。结论:PVA+结合了肾功能差异(增强程度)和实质体积,在预测rnu后NBGFR方面优于其他基于SRF和非SRF的方法。这些发现减轻了人们的担忧,即在这一人群中,肾积水和irm的患病率降低了基于srf的入路的准确性。PVA+可以为高危UTUC患者的全身化疗时机提供咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信