Mapping motivational factors for continuous medical education: insights from general practitioners with varying levels of participating in CME.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Helle Ibsen, Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, Jens Søndergaard, Igor Švab, Niels Kristian Kjær
{"title":"Mapping motivational factors for continuous medical education: insights from general practitioners with varying levels of participating in CME.","authors":"Helle Ibsen, Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, Jens Søndergaard, Igor Švab, Niels Kristian Kjær","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2498508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners' (GPs) participation in continuous medical education (CME) is crucial for patient care, GPs' well-being and healthcare costs. Despite this, 25% of Danish GPs did not participate in CME in 2022. It is vital to understand motivational factors for engaging in CME.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze motivation for CME and differences in motivational factors among GPs with different levels of participating.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A cross-sectional questionnaire informed from qualitative interviews was conducted among all 3257 GPs in Denmark in May 2023.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The response rate was 40%. Responders were categorized as 'frequent', 'partial' and 'infrequent' CME users. We employed descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis to quantify predefined motivational factors. Free text comments were analyzed using systematic text condensation. We used self-determination theory as a framework in the interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most reported motivational factors were 'relevant medical update' (98%) and 'topics of interest' (96%). Financial incentives had a minor impact across all groups. Infrequent users were less easy to motivate and were more likely to state controlled motivational factors, e.g. a duty. Frequent and partial users of CME reported more autonomous motivation, i.e. personal development, collegial togetherness and professional well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relevant medical updates that enhance perceived competence in patient care are crucial for all GPs. Infrequent users seem less motivated by avoiding burnout, collegial togetherness and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2498508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General practitioners' (GPs) participation in continuous medical education (CME) is crucial for patient care, GPs' well-being and healthcare costs. Despite this, 25% of Danish GPs did not participate in CME in 2022. It is vital to understand motivational factors for engaging in CME.

Aim: To analyze motivation for CME and differences in motivational factors among GPs with different levels of participating.

Design and setting: A cross-sectional questionnaire informed from qualitative interviews was conducted among all 3257 GPs in Denmark in May 2023.

Method: The response rate was 40%. Responders were categorized as 'frequent', 'partial' and 'infrequent' CME users. We employed descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis to quantify predefined motivational factors. Free text comments were analyzed using systematic text condensation. We used self-determination theory as a framework in the interpretation.

Results: Most reported motivational factors were 'relevant medical update' (98%) and 'topics of interest' (96%). Financial incentives had a minor impact across all groups. Infrequent users were less easy to motivate and were more likely to state controlled motivational factors, e.g. a duty. Frequent and partial users of CME reported more autonomous motivation, i.e. personal development, collegial togetherness and professional well-being.

Conclusions: Relevant medical updates that enhance perceived competence in patient care are crucial for all GPs. Infrequent users seem less motivated by avoiding burnout, collegial togetherness and well-being.

绘制持续医学教育的动机因素:来自不同程度参与CME的全科医生的见解。
背景:全科医生(全科医生)参与持续医学教育(CME)对患者护理、全科医生的福祉和医疗成本至关重要。尽管如此,25%的丹麦全科医生在2022年没有参加CME。了解参与CME的动机因素是至关重要的。目的:分析不同参与程度的全科医生继续医学教育的动机及动机因素的差异。设计和设置:从定性访谈中获得的横断面问卷于2023年5月在丹麦所有3257名全科医生中进行。方法:有效率为40%。应答者被分类为“频繁”、“部分”和“不频繁”CME使用者。我们采用描述性统计和逻辑回归分析来量化预定义的激励因素。利用系统的文本浓缩对自由文本注释进行分析。我们以自我决定理论作为解释的框架。结果:大多数报告的动机因素是“相关的医疗更新”(98%)和“感兴趣的话题”(96%)。经济激励对所有群体的影响都不大。不经常使用的人不太容易被激励,他们更有可能说出可控的激励因素,比如责任。经常和部分使用CME的人报告了更多的自主动机,即个人发展,同事团结和职业福祉。结论:相关的医学更新,提高感知能力的病人护理是至关重要的所有全科医生。不经常使用手机的人似乎没有那么大的动力来避免倦怠、大学团聚和幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信