Improving access, mixed continuity: effects of multidisciplinary teams on primary health-care in Finland - a quasi-experimental study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elisa Jokelin, Laura Piirainen, Erja Mustonen, Paulus Torkki
{"title":"Improving access, mixed continuity: effects of multidisciplinary teams on primary health-care in Finland - a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Elisa Jokelin, Laura Piirainen, Erja Mustonen, Paulus Torkki","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2502658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach in primary care is a relatively recent innovation, developed over the past 15 years. There is limited data on MDTs' effects on Quadruple Aim (QA) goals. The object of this study is to evaluate the implementation of a novel MDT from 2021 to 2023 and its impact on access and continuity of care, compared to an established model. Future research will explore its effects on staff satisfaction, costs, and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and patients: </strong>This quasi-experimental study compares five intervention health centers with three control centers. It includes all primary care patients from 2021 to 2023, presenting data on access and continuity before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Nurse-only consultations were replaced with a multidisciplinary nurse-physician model to address issues during initial contact more effectively. Nurses also took on the role of case managers, enhancing relational continuity. Lean daily visual management with continuous improvement, strategic goal setting, and coaching leadership style were implemented.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Access was measured using the 'third available appointment' (T3) metric, and continuity with the COC-index, both for physicians only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Access improved at all intervention centers, with T3 reduced from 90 to 1.125-4.75 days, while controls remained at 90 days. COC improved at three intervention centers but declined at two, with declines also observed at control centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel MDT enhanced primary care access compared to the traditional model. However, relying solely on T3 may be insufficient for evaluating effectiveness. Mixed results in continuity underscore the need for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2502658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach in primary care is a relatively recent innovation, developed over the past 15 years. There is limited data on MDTs' effects on Quadruple Aim (QA) goals. The object of this study is to evaluate the implementation of a novel MDT from 2021 to 2023 and its impact on access and continuity of care, compared to an established model. Future research will explore its effects on staff satisfaction, costs, and health outcomes.

Design, setting and patients: This quasi-experimental study compares five intervention health centers with three control centers. It includes all primary care patients from 2021 to 2023, presenting data on access and continuity before and after the intervention.

Intervention: Nurse-only consultations were replaced with a multidisciplinary nurse-physician model to address issues during initial contact more effectively. Nurses also took on the role of case managers, enhancing relational continuity. Lean daily visual management with continuous improvement, strategic goal setting, and coaching leadership style were implemented.

Main outcome measures: Access was measured using the 'third available appointment' (T3) metric, and continuity with the COC-index, both for physicians only.

Results: Access improved at all intervention centers, with T3 reduced from 90 to 1.125-4.75 days, while controls remained at 90 days. COC improved at three intervention centers but declined at two, with declines also observed at control centers.

Conclusion: The novel MDT enhanced primary care access compared to the traditional model. However, relying solely on T3 may be insufficient for evaluating effectiveness. Mixed results in continuity underscore the need for further investigation.

改善获取和混合连续性:多学科小组对芬兰初级保健的影响——一项准实验研究。
目的:多学科团队(MDT)方法在初级保健是一个相对较新的创新,发展在过去的15年。关于MDTs对四重目标(QA)目标的影响的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估2021年至2023年新型MDT的实施情况及其对现有模式的可及性和连续性的影响。未来的研究将探讨其对员工满意度、成本和健康结果的影响。设计、设置和患者:这个准实验研究比较了五个干预健康中心和三个控制中心。它包括2021年至2023年期间的所有初级保健患者,提供了干预前后可及性和连续性的数据。干预措施:仅护士咨询被多学科护士-医生模式取代,以更有效地解决初次接触时的问题。护士还承担了病例管理人员的角色,增强了关系的连续性。精益日常视觉管理与持续改进,战略目标设定和教练领导风格的实施。主要结果测量:使用“第三次可预约”(T3)指标和coc指数的连续性来测量可及性,两者均仅针对医生。结果:所有干预中心的可及性都有所改善,T3从90天减少到1.125-4.75天,而对照组保持在90天。COC在三个干预中心有所改善,但在两个干预中心有所下降,在控制中心也观察到下降。结论:与传统模式相比,新型MDT提高了初级保健的可及性。然而,仅仅依靠T3可能不足以评估有效性。连续性方面的好坏参半的结果强调了进一步调查的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信