Trends in Outpatient Buprenorphine Prescribing for Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Analysis Over 18 Months.

Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2025-04-08
Jamal Hasoon, Ahish Chitneni, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Farnad Imani, Giustino Varrassi
{"title":"Trends in Outpatient Buprenorphine Prescribing for Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Analysis Over 18 Months.","authors":"Jamal Hasoon, Ahish Chitneni, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Farnad Imani, Giustino Varrassi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, has gained attention for its use in chronic pain management due to its lower risk of abuse and respiratory depression compared to traditional opioids. The utilization of buprenorphine for chronic pain has increased in recent years. This study aimed to analyze trends in buprenorphine prescribing for chronic pain in an outpatient setting over an 18-month period, excluding buprenorphine-naloxone combinations used for opioid use disorder and opioid dependence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted, examining outpatient buprenorphine and long-acting opioid prescriptions issued by three pain management physicians between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024. Prescription data were collected from electronic medical records (EMRs) and analyzed across three six-month intervals: January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023; July 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023; and January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. Only unique buprenorphine prescriptions for chronic pain management were included, while buprenorphine-naloxone prescriptions for opioid use disorder were excluded. Long-acting opioids analyzed included extended release (ER) formulations including tramadol ER, morphine ER, hydrocodone ER, oxycodone ER, fentanyl, and methadone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 18-month study period, a total of 61 unique buprenorphine prescriptions for chronic pain were issued by the three physicians. The number of prescriptions increased across each six-month period: 18 prescriptions were issued between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2023; 20 prescriptions from July 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023; and 23 prescriptions from January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. This represents a 27.8% increase over the entire 18-month period. During the same timeframe, 117 long-acting opioid prescriptions (excluding buprenorphine) were issued in the first six-month period, 121 prescriptions in the second period, and 108 prescriptions in the third period. Buprenorphine prescriptions accounted for 13.3% of all long-acting opioid prescriptions in the first period (18 out of 135 total prescriptions), 14.2% in the second period (20 out of 141 total prescriptions), and 17.6% in the third period (23 out of 131 total prescriptions). Notably, while the absolute number of buprenorphine prescriptions increased steadily, its proportion relative to total long-acting opioid prescriptions also grew over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings demonstrate a steady increase in buprenorphine prescribing for chronic pain in the outpatient setting, while long-acting opioid prescriptions exhibited a slight decline in the later periods. The proportion of buprenorphine prescriptions relative to long-acting opioids increased over time, suggesting growing acceptance of buprenorphine as a safer alternative for chronic pain management. Further research is needed to explore the factors driving these prescribing patterns and the long-term clinical outcomes associated with buprenorphine use in chronic pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94351,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"55 3","pages":"8-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, has gained attention for its use in chronic pain management due to its lower risk of abuse and respiratory depression compared to traditional opioids. The utilization of buprenorphine for chronic pain has increased in recent years. This study aimed to analyze trends in buprenorphine prescribing for chronic pain in an outpatient setting over an 18-month period, excluding buprenorphine-naloxone combinations used for opioid use disorder and opioid dependence.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted, examining outpatient buprenorphine and long-acting opioid prescriptions issued by three pain management physicians between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024. Prescription data were collected from electronic medical records (EMRs) and analyzed across three six-month intervals: January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023; July 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023; and January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. Only unique buprenorphine prescriptions for chronic pain management were included, while buprenorphine-naloxone prescriptions for opioid use disorder were excluded. Long-acting opioids analyzed included extended release (ER) formulations including tramadol ER, morphine ER, hydrocodone ER, oxycodone ER, fentanyl, and methadone.

Results: Over the 18-month study period, a total of 61 unique buprenorphine prescriptions for chronic pain were issued by the three physicians. The number of prescriptions increased across each six-month period: 18 prescriptions were issued between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2023; 20 prescriptions from July 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023; and 23 prescriptions from January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. This represents a 27.8% increase over the entire 18-month period. During the same timeframe, 117 long-acting opioid prescriptions (excluding buprenorphine) were issued in the first six-month period, 121 prescriptions in the second period, and 108 prescriptions in the third period. Buprenorphine prescriptions accounted for 13.3% of all long-acting opioid prescriptions in the first period (18 out of 135 total prescriptions), 14.2% in the second period (20 out of 141 total prescriptions), and 17.6% in the third period (23 out of 131 total prescriptions). Notably, while the absolute number of buprenorphine prescriptions increased steadily, its proportion relative to total long-acting opioid prescriptions also grew over time.

Conclusions: The findings demonstrate a steady increase in buprenorphine prescribing for chronic pain in the outpatient setting, while long-acting opioid prescriptions exhibited a slight decline in the later periods. The proportion of buprenorphine prescriptions relative to long-acting opioids increased over time, suggesting growing acceptance of buprenorphine as a safer alternative for chronic pain management. Further research is needed to explore the factors driving these prescribing patterns and the long-term clinical outcomes associated with buprenorphine use in chronic pain management.

门诊丁丙诺啡治疗慢性疼痛的趋势:18个月的回顾性分析。
背景:丁丙诺啡是一种部分阿片类药物激动剂,与传统阿片类药物相比,丁丙诺啡的滥用和呼吸抑制风险较低,因此在慢性疼痛治疗中得到了广泛关注。丁丙诺啡治疗慢性疼痛的应用近年来有所增加。本研究旨在分析18个月来门诊慢性疼痛丁丙诺啡处方的趋势,不包括用于阿片类药物使用障碍和阿片类药物依赖的丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮联合用药。方法:回顾性分析3位疼痛管理医师在2023年1月1日至2024年6月30日期间开具的门诊丁丙诺啡和长效阿片类药物处方。从电子病历(emr)中收集处方数据,并在三个六个月的间隔中进行分析:2023年1月1日至2023年6月30日;2023年7月1日至2023年12月31日;2024年1月1日至2024年6月30日。仅包括用于慢性疼痛管理的独特丁丙诺啡处方,而用于阿片类药物使用障碍的丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮处方被排除在外。分析的长效阿片类药物包括曲马多ER、吗啡ER、氢可酮ER、羟考酮ER、芬太尼和美沙酮等缓释制剂。结果:在18个月的研究期间,三位医生共开出61张丁丙诺啡治疗慢性疼痛的独特处方。处方数量在每个六个月期间都有所增加:2023年1月1日至2023年6月30日期间开出了18张处方;2023年7月1日至2023年12月31日处方20张;以及2024年1月1日至2024年6月30日的23张处方。这在整个18个月期间增长了27.8%。在同一时间段内,前六个月开出了117张长效阿片类药物处方(不包括丁丙诺啡),第二期开出了121张处方,第三期开出了108张处方。丁丙诺啡处方占第一期所有长效阿片类药物处方的13.3%(135张中有18张),第二期占14.2%(141张中有20张),第三期占17.6%(131张中有23张)。值得注意的是,丁丙诺啡处方的绝对数量稳步增长,其相对于长效阿片类药物处方总量的比例也随着时间的推移而增长。结论:研究结果表明,丁丙诺啡在门诊治疗慢性疼痛的处方稳步增加,而长效阿片类药物的处方在后期略有下降。丁丙诺啡处方相对于长效阿片类药物的比例随着时间的推移而增加,这表明丁丙诺啡越来越被接受为一种更安全的慢性疼痛治疗选择。需要进一步的研究来探索驱动这些处方模式的因素以及丁丙诺啡在慢性疼痛管理中使用的长期临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信