Transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in simple nephrectomy.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Indian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.4103/iju.iju_304_24
Jeena R Kudunthail, Kartik Sharma, Deepak Prakash Bhirud, Mahendra Singh, Gautam Ram Choudhary, Shiv Charan Navriya, Arjun Singh Sandhu
{"title":"Transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in simple nephrectomy.","authors":"Jeena R Kudunthail, Kartik Sharma, Deepak Prakash Bhirud, Mahendra Singh, Gautam Ram Choudhary, Shiv Charan Navriya, Arjun Singh Sandhu","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_304_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES), particularly transvaginal NOSES, is an innovative approach in laparoscopic urological surgery. This study aims to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of transvaginal NOSES in women undergoing laparoscopic simple nephrectomy in an Indian cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted from September 2022 to May 2024 in the department of urology, including 15 women with prior vaginal deliveries undergoing simple nephrectomy. Exclusion criteria were vaginal scarring, previous pelvic surgeries, active intravaginal infections, cervical neoplasia, unresolved pelvic inflammation, and patient refusal. Parameters assessed included operative time, specimen extraction time, blood loss, postoperative recovery metrics, Female Sexual Function Index, and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire scores at the baseline and at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 45.73 years. The average operative time, including the specimen extraction was 127.8 min and the average extraction time was 30.13 min. None required conversion to open surgery, and the average blood loss was 68.0 mL with no intraoperative transfusions. The postoperative recovery was rapid, with milestones achieved within 1 day, and the average hospital stay was 2.2 days. Pain scores were low (Visual Analog Scale: 2.87 at 24 h and 1.47 at 48 h). The complication rate was 6.67%, with one case of vaginal bleeding which was managed conservatively. Postoperative pelvic floor and sexual functions were preserved without significant adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transvaginal NOSES is a feasible and safe technique for nephrectomy, offering reduced postoperative pain, minimal blood loss, and rapid recovery, enhancing surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 2","pages":"104-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_304_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES), particularly transvaginal NOSES, is an innovative approach in laparoscopic urological surgery. This study aims to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of transvaginal NOSES in women undergoing laparoscopic simple nephrectomy in an Indian cohort.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from September 2022 to May 2024 in the department of urology, including 15 women with prior vaginal deliveries undergoing simple nephrectomy. Exclusion criteria were vaginal scarring, previous pelvic surgeries, active intravaginal infections, cervical neoplasia, unresolved pelvic inflammation, and patient refusal. Parameters assessed included operative time, specimen extraction time, blood loss, postoperative recovery metrics, Female Sexual Function Index, and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire scores at the baseline and at 3 months.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 45.73 years. The average operative time, including the specimen extraction was 127.8 min and the average extraction time was 30.13 min. None required conversion to open surgery, and the average blood loss was 68.0 mL with no intraoperative transfusions. The postoperative recovery was rapid, with milestones achieved within 1 day, and the average hospital stay was 2.2 days. Pain scores were low (Visual Analog Scale: 2.87 at 24 h and 1.47 at 48 h). The complication rate was 6.67%, with one case of vaginal bleeding which was managed conservatively. Postoperative pelvic floor and sexual functions were preserved without significant adverse effects.

Conclusion: Transvaginal NOSES is a feasible and safe technique for nephrectomy, offering reduced postoperative pain, minimal blood loss, and rapid recovery, enhancing surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

经阴道自然孔标本提取术在单纯肾切除术中的应用。
自然孔口标本提取手术(鼻),特别是经阴道鼻,是腹腔镜泌尿外科的一种创新方法。本研究旨在评估经阴道鼻入路在印度一组接受腹腔镜单纯肾切除术的妇女中的可行性、安全性和结果。方法:于2022年9月至2024年5月在泌尿科进行前瞻性观察研究,包括15名阴道分娩的女性行单纯肾切除术。排除标准为阴道瘢痕、既往盆腔手术、活动性阴道内感染、宫颈肿瘤、未解决的盆腔炎症和患者拒绝。评估的参数包括基线和3个月时的手术时间、标本提取时间、出血量、术后恢复指标、女性性功能指数和骨盆底影响问卷评分。结果:患者平均年龄45.73岁。包括标本提取在内的平均手术时间为127.8 min,平均抽出时间为30.13 min,无需中转开腹手术,平均出血量68.0 mL,术中无输血。术后恢复迅速,在1天内达到里程碑,平均住院时间为2.2天。疼痛评分较低(视觉模拟评分:24小时2.87分,48小时1.47分)。并发症发生率为6.67%,阴道出血1例,均予保守处理。术后盆底及性功能均得以保留,无明显不良反应。结论:经阴道鼻经术是一种可行且安全的肾切除术技术,术后疼痛减轻,出血量少,恢复快,可提高手术效果和患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信