Use of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in a Nation-Wide Veterans Health Administration Sample: The Role of Clinic, Therapist, and Patient Factors.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alan McGuire, Mindy Flanagan, Madison E Stout, Jessica Coffing, Marina Kukla, Morgan Traylor, Laura Myers, Nancy Henry, Jessica Carter, Marianne Matthias
{"title":"Use of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in a Nation-Wide Veterans Health Administration Sample: The Role of Clinic, Therapist, and Patient Factors.","authors":"Alan McGuire, Mindy Flanagan, Madison E Stout, Jessica Coffing, Marina Kukla, Morgan Traylor, Laura Myers, Nancy Henry, Jessica Carter, Marianne Matthias","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the use of CBT-CP (Cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain) by CBT-CP-trained therapists to treat patients with pain over a five-year period (October 2015-February 2020).</p><p><strong>Data sources and study setting: </strong>CBT-CP is a core evidence-based practice that is central to multidisciplinary chronic pain care. However, research suggests that CBT-CP is underused. The current study used national Veterans Health Administration data to examine the use of CBT-CP by CBT-CP-trained therapists to treat patients with pain over a five-year period.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Multilevel modeling was used to evaluate clinic, therapist, and patient-level factors as predictors of CBT-CP receipt.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>Administrative data on 37,514 patients seen at a national sample of Veterans Health Administration locations for pain were collected from the U.S. Veterans Health Administration central data repository.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Results indicated 38.4% of patients with pain seen by a CBT-CP-trained therapist received CBT-CP during the observation period. Patients were more likely to receive CBT-CP if more time elapsed since their therapist received CBT-CP training and if their therapist had a master's degree (vs. a doctorate). Patients with somatic symptom disorder and depressive disorders were more likely to receive CBT-CP, while patients with comorbid personality disorders or substance use disorders were less likely to receive CBT-CP. Patients seen in pain specialty, PTSD, biomedical, and mental health clinics were more likely to receive CBT-CP than those not seen in these clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that the reach of CBT-CP is substantively related to factors at each level. Future research is needed to better understand the therapy treatment decision-making processes and to address education gaps and other factors that impede the implementation of evidence-based practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the use of CBT-CP (Cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain) by CBT-CP-trained therapists to treat patients with pain over a five-year period (October 2015-February 2020).

Data sources and study setting: CBT-CP is a core evidence-based practice that is central to multidisciplinary chronic pain care. However, research suggests that CBT-CP is underused. The current study used national Veterans Health Administration data to examine the use of CBT-CP by CBT-CP-trained therapists to treat patients with pain over a five-year period.

Study design: Multilevel modeling was used to evaluate clinic, therapist, and patient-level factors as predictors of CBT-CP receipt.

Data collection: Administrative data on 37,514 patients seen at a national sample of Veterans Health Administration locations for pain were collected from the U.S. Veterans Health Administration central data repository.

Principal findings: Results indicated 38.4% of patients with pain seen by a CBT-CP-trained therapist received CBT-CP during the observation period. Patients were more likely to receive CBT-CP if more time elapsed since their therapist received CBT-CP training and if their therapist had a master's degree (vs. a doctorate). Patients with somatic symptom disorder and depressive disorders were more likely to receive CBT-CP, while patients with comorbid personality disorders or substance use disorders were less likely to receive CBT-CP. Patients seen in pain specialty, PTSD, biomedical, and mental health clinics were more likely to receive CBT-CP than those not seen in these clinics.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that the reach of CBT-CP is substantively related to factors at each level. Future research is needed to better understand the therapy treatment decision-making processes and to address education gaps and other factors that impede the implementation of evidence-based practices.

认知行为疗法在全国退伍军人健康管理样本中的应用:诊所、治疗师和患者因素的作用。
目的:研究CBT-CP(认知行为治疗慢性疼痛)在5年(2015年10月- 2020年2月)期间由CBT-CP培训的治疗师治疗疼痛患者的使用情况。数据来源和研究背景:CBT-CP是多学科慢性疼痛治疗的核心循证实践。然而,研究表明CBT-CP未得到充分利用。目前的研究使用了国家退伍军人健康管理局的数据来检查CBT-CP训练的治疗师在五年内治疗疼痛患者时使用CBT-CP。研究设计:采用多水平模型来评估临床、治疗师和患者水平的因素作为CBT-CP接受的预测因素。数据收集:从美国退伍军人健康管理局中央数据存储库中收集了37,514名在退伍军人健康管理局全国范围内的疼痛样本患者的管理数据。主要发现:结果显示,在观察期间,接受CBT-CP培训的治疗师所见的疼痛患者中有38.4%接受了CBT-CP治疗。如果他们的治疗师接受CBT-CP培训的时间较长,如果他们的治疗师拥有硕士学位(与博士学位相比),患者更有可能接受CBT-CP。躯体症状障碍和抑郁症患者接受CBT-CP的可能性较大,而合并人格障碍或物质使用障碍的患者接受CBT-CP的可能性较小。在疼痛专科、创伤后应激障碍、生物医学和心理健康诊所就诊的患者比不在这些诊所就诊的患者更有可能接受CBT-CP。结论:研究结果表明,CBT-CP的达到程度与各水平的因素有实质性的关系。未来的研究需要更好地了解治疗决策过程,并解决教育差距和其他阻碍循证实践实施的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信