Implementation of Recovery Tracker: A Postdischarge Electronic Remote Symptom-Monitoring Survey Tool After Major Urologic Oncology Surgeries.

IF 2.8 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00328
Richard S Matulewicz, Fady Baky, Samuel Gold, Viranda H Jayalath, Rebecca Yu, Nicole Liso, Amy L Tin, Melissa Assel, Andrew J Vickers, Michael Hannon, Sigrid V Carlsson, Jennifer R Cracchiolo, Alvin C Goh
{"title":"Implementation of Recovery Tracker: A Postdischarge Electronic Remote Symptom-Monitoring Survey Tool After Major Urologic Oncology Surgeries.","authors":"Richard S Matulewicz, Fady Baky, Samuel Gold, Viranda H Jayalath, Rebecca Yu, Nicole Liso, Amy L Tin, Melissa Assel, Andrew J Vickers, Michael Hannon, Sigrid V Carlsson, Jennifer R Cracchiolo, Alvin C Goh","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Remote symptom monitoring shows promise in promoting postdischarge contact between patients and clinicians. Unique strategies may be needed to tailor reach and engagement to specific patient populations. We aimed to assess implementation and effectiveness outcomes of a patient-reported symptom assessment tool (Recovery Tracker [RT]) after major urologic operations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing one of four procedures (2016-2022) at a metropolitan cancer center-radical prostatectomy, nephrectomy, radical cystectomy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer-were included in the study. Electronic delivery of RT was embedded in routine perioperative patient care. Outcomes were assessed according to the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. Descriptive statistics was reported for reach, effectiveness, and adoption; a linear mixed-effects model for implementation; and a general additive model and fixed-effects meta-analysis for maintenance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised 8,934 patients. Reach, defined as patients correctly receiving the survey, was 98% overall, with 81% (95% CI, 80 to 82) of patients completing at least one survey and the majority completing >7. The median time to completion was <2 minutes and improved as patients completed more surveys (<i>P</i> < .001), with slight variation among procedure types. The survey was effective, initiating patient-clinician contact when alert thresholds were triggered, with a marginal increase in the need for clinician office phone calls. Patient engagement with RT was maintained over several years, with a slight improvement after the addition of e-mail reminders (between 3% and 8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a daily electronic survey after hospital discharge after major urologic surgeries is feasible and used often by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Remote symptom monitoring shows promise in promoting postdischarge contact between patients and clinicians. Unique strategies may be needed to tailor reach and engagement to specific patient populations. We aimed to assess implementation and effectiveness outcomes of a patient-reported symptom assessment tool (Recovery Tracker [RT]) after major urologic operations.

Materials and methods: Patients undergoing one of four procedures (2016-2022) at a metropolitan cancer center-radical prostatectomy, nephrectomy, radical cystectomy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer-were included in the study. Electronic delivery of RT was embedded in routine perioperative patient care. Outcomes were assessed according to the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. Descriptive statistics was reported for reach, effectiveness, and adoption; a linear mixed-effects model for implementation; and a general additive model and fixed-effects meta-analysis for maintenance.

Results: The cohort comprised 8,934 patients. Reach, defined as patients correctly receiving the survey, was 98% overall, with 81% (95% CI, 80 to 82) of patients completing at least one survey and the majority completing >7. The median time to completion was <2 minutes and improved as patients completed more surveys (P < .001), with slight variation among procedure types. The survey was effective, initiating patient-clinician contact when alert thresholds were triggered, with a marginal increase in the need for clinician office phone calls. Patient engagement with RT was maintained over several years, with a slight improvement after the addition of e-mail reminders (between 3% and 8%).

Conclusion: Implementing a daily electronic survey after hospital discharge after major urologic surgeries is feasible and used often by patients.

恢复跟踪器的实现:一种泌尿外科肿瘤大手术后的出院后电子远程症状监测调查工具。
目的:远程症状监测有望促进出院后患者与临床医生之间的联系。可能需要独特的策略来为特定的患者群体量身定制覆盖范围和参与。我们的目的是评估重大泌尿外科手术后患者报告的症状评估工具(恢复跟踪器[RT])的实施和有效性结果。材料和方法:在大都会癌症中心接受根治性前列腺切除术、肾切除术、根治性膀胱切除术和腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(2016-2022)四种手术之一的患者被纳入研究。电子放射治疗已嵌入常规围手术期患者护理中。结果根据覆盖范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护框架进行评估。报告了覆盖率、有效性和采用率的描述性统计数据;用于实施的线性混合效应模型;并对维修进行了一般加性模型和固定效应元分析。结果:该队列包括8,934例患者。达到,定义为正确接受调查的患者,总体为98%,81% (95% CI, 80 - 82)的患者完成了至少一项调查,大多数患者完成了bbb7。完成手术的中位时间为P < 0.001),不同手术类型之间有轻微差异。这项调查是有效的,当警报阈值被触发时,启动了患者与临床医生的联系,对临床医生办公室电话的需求略有增加。患者参与RT治疗持续数年,在增加电子邮件提醒后略有改善(3%至8%)。结论:泌尿外科大手术出院后每日进行电子问卷调查是可行的,并为患者普遍采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信