Machine Learning Models of Early Longitudinal Toxicity Trajectories Predict Cetuximab Concentration and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Survival in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group/AGITG CO.17/20 Trials.
Danielle Lilly Nicholls, Maria C Xu, Luna Zhan, Divya Sharma, Katrina Hueniken, Kaitlyn Chiasson, Mary Wahba, M Catherine Brown, Benjamin Grant, Jeremy Shapiro, Christos S Karapetis, John Simes, Derek Jonker, Dongsheng Tu, Christopher O'Callaghan, Eric Chen, Geoffrey Liu
{"title":"Machine Learning Models of Early Longitudinal Toxicity Trajectories Predict Cetuximab Concentration and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Survival in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group/AGITG CO.17/20 Trials.","authors":"Danielle Lilly Nicholls, Maria C Xu, Luna Zhan, Divya Sharma, Katrina Hueniken, Kaitlyn Chiasson, Mary Wahba, M Catherine Brown, Benjamin Grant, Jeremy Shapiro, Christos S Karapetis, John Simes, Derek Jonker, Dongsheng Tu, Christopher O'Callaghan, Eric Chen, Geoffrey Liu","doi":"10.1200/CCI.24.00114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cetuximab (CET), targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, is a systemic treatment option for patients with colorectal cancer. One known predictive factor for CET efficacy is the presence of CET-related rash; other putative toxicity factors include fatigue and nausea. Analysis of early CET-associated toxicities may reveal patient subpopulations that clinically benefit from long-term CET treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from CO.20 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00640471) trial arms, CET + brivanib alaninate (BRIV) (n = 376) and CET + placebo (n = 374), and CO.17 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00079066) trial arms, CET (+best supportive care [BSC]; n = 287) and BSC only (n = 285). Patients were clustered into subpopulations using KmL3D, a machine learning method, to analyze 14 joint longitudinal toxicity trajectories from weeks 0 to 8 of treatment. Landmark survival analyses were performed from 8 weeks after treatment initiation. Regression analyses assessed the relationship between subpopulations and plasma CET concentrations. Three supervised machine learning models were developed to assign patients in the CO.20-CET trial arm into subpopulations, which were then validated using CO.20-CET-BRIV and CO.17-CET trial arm data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Joint longitudinal toxicity clustering revealed dichotomous high- and low-toxicity clusters, with all CET-containing arms showing consistent toxicity trajectories and characteristics. High-toxicity clusters were associated with male predilection, fewer metastatic sites, fewer colon-only primaries, and higher body mass indices. In CO.20 trial samples, higher toxicity clusters were associated with improved overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes (adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 2.21 to 4.36) and higher CET concentrations (<i>P</i> = .003). The random forest predictive model performed the best, with an AUC of 0.981 (0.963-0.999).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We used an innovative machine learning approach to analyze longitudinal joint drug toxicities, demonstrating their role in predicting patient outcomes through a putative pharmacokinetic mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.24.00114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Cetuximab (CET), targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, is a systemic treatment option for patients with colorectal cancer. One known predictive factor for CET efficacy is the presence of CET-related rash; other putative toxicity factors include fatigue and nausea. Analysis of early CET-associated toxicities may reveal patient subpopulations that clinically benefit from long-term CET treatment.
Methods: We analyzed data from CO.20 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00640471) trial arms, CET + brivanib alaninate (BRIV) (n = 376) and CET + placebo (n = 374), and CO.17 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00079066) trial arms, CET (+best supportive care [BSC]; n = 287) and BSC only (n = 285). Patients were clustered into subpopulations using KmL3D, a machine learning method, to analyze 14 joint longitudinal toxicity trajectories from weeks 0 to 8 of treatment. Landmark survival analyses were performed from 8 weeks after treatment initiation. Regression analyses assessed the relationship between subpopulations and plasma CET concentrations. Three supervised machine learning models were developed to assign patients in the CO.20-CET trial arm into subpopulations, which were then validated using CO.20-CET-BRIV and CO.17-CET trial arm data.
Results: Joint longitudinal toxicity clustering revealed dichotomous high- and low-toxicity clusters, with all CET-containing arms showing consistent toxicity trajectories and characteristics. High-toxicity clusters were associated with male predilection, fewer metastatic sites, fewer colon-only primaries, and higher body mass indices. In CO.20 trial samples, higher toxicity clusters were associated with improved overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes (adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 2.21 to 4.36) and higher CET concentrations (P = .003). The random forest predictive model performed the best, with an AUC of 0.981 (0.963-0.999).
Conclusion: We used an innovative machine learning approach to analyze longitudinal joint drug toxicities, demonstrating their role in predicting patient outcomes through a putative pharmacokinetic mechanism.