Pulmonary ultrasound in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia in South Africa: An observational study.

Q3 Medicine
S A van Blydenstein, T Nell, C Menezes, B F Jacobson, S Omar
{"title":"Pulmonary ultrasound in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia in South Africa: An observational study.","authors":"S A van Blydenstein, T Nell, C Menezes, B F Jacobson, S Omar","doi":"10.7196/AJTCCM.2025.v31i1.1887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary ultrasound techniques have historically been applied to acute lung diseases to describe lung lesions, particularly in critical care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in hospitalised patients with hypoxaemic pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre prospective, observational study of two groups of adult patients with hypoxaemic pneumonia: those with COVID-19 pneumonia, and those with non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A pulmonologist performed bedside LUS using the Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency (BLUE) protocol, and the findings were verified by an independent study-blinded radiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 48 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and 24 with non-COVID CAP. The COVID-19 patients were significantly older than those with non-COVID CAP (median (interquartile range (IQR)) age 52 (42 - 62.5) years v. 42.5 (36 - 52.5) years, respectively; p=0.007), and had a lower prevalence of HIV infection (25% v. 54%, respectively; p=0.01) and higher prevalences of hypertension (54% v. 7%; p=0.002) and diabetes mellitus (19% v. 8%; p=0.04). In both groups, close to 30% of the patients had severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. A confluent B-line pattern in the right upper lobe was significantly associated with COVID-19 pneumonia compared with the C pattern (relative risk (RR) 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7 - 8.6). Bilateral changes on LUS rather than unilateral or no changes were associated with COVID-19 pneumonia (RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.004 - 2.387). There were no statistically significant differences in median (IQR) lung scores between patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with non-COVID CAP (8 (4 - 11.5) v. 7.5 (4.5 - 12.5), respectively). Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had a higher than predicted mortality. Logistic regression analysis showed a higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.02 - 1.21) and a lower total LUS score indicating B lines v. consolidation (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65 - 0.99) to be associated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with right upper zone consolidation were more likely to have non-COVID CAP than COVID-19 pneumonia. Finding a B pattern as opposed to consolidation was associated with mortality. The admission LUS score was unable to discriminate between COVID-19 and non-COVID CAP, and did not correlate with the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired oxygen, clinical severity or mortality.</p><p><strong>Study synopsis: </strong><b>What the study adds.</b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, in a resource-limited, high-prevalence setting, lung ultrasound (LUS) patterns on admission to hospital were used to distinguish between COVID-19 and other causes in patients with hypoxaemic pneumonia. Patients with right upper zone consolidation were more likely to have non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) than COVID-19 pneumonia.<b>Implications of the findings.</b> The admission LUS score was unable to discriminate between COVID-19 pneumonia and non-COVID CAP, and did not correlate with the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired oxygen, clinical severity or mortality. The pattern was more valuable than the total LUS score in understanding the disease process.</p>","PeriodicalId":52847,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"e1887"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/AJTCCM.2025.v31i1.1887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary ultrasound techniques have historically been applied to acute lung diseases to describe lung lesions, particularly in critical care.

Objectives: To explore the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in hospitalised patients with hypoxaemic pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This was a single-centre prospective, observational study of two groups of adult patients with hypoxaemic pneumonia: those with COVID-19 pneumonia, and those with non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A pulmonologist performed bedside LUS using the Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency (BLUE) protocol, and the findings were verified by an independent study-blinded radiologist.

Results: We enrolled 48 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and 24 with non-COVID CAP. The COVID-19 patients were significantly older than those with non-COVID CAP (median (interquartile range (IQR)) age 52 (42 - 62.5) years v. 42.5 (36 - 52.5) years, respectively; p=0.007), and had a lower prevalence of HIV infection (25% v. 54%, respectively; p=0.01) and higher prevalences of hypertension (54% v. 7%; p=0.002) and diabetes mellitus (19% v. 8%; p=0.04). In both groups, close to 30% of the patients had severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. A confluent B-line pattern in the right upper lobe was significantly associated with COVID-19 pneumonia compared with the C pattern (relative risk (RR) 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7 - 8.6). Bilateral changes on LUS rather than unilateral or no changes were associated with COVID-19 pneumonia (RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.004 - 2.387). There were no statistically significant differences in median (IQR) lung scores between patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with non-COVID CAP (8 (4 - 11.5) v. 7.5 (4.5 - 12.5), respectively). Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had a higher than predicted mortality. Logistic regression analysis showed a higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.02 - 1.21) and a lower total LUS score indicating B lines v. consolidation (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65 - 0.99) to be associated with mortality.

Conclusion: Patients with right upper zone consolidation were more likely to have non-COVID CAP than COVID-19 pneumonia. Finding a B pattern as opposed to consolidation was associated with mortality. The admission LUS score was unable to discriminate between COVID-19 and non-COVID CAP, and did not correlate with the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired oxygen, clinical severity or mortality.

Study synopsis: What the study adds. During the COVID-19 pandemic, in a resource-limited, high-prevalence setting, lung ultrasound (LUS) patterns on admission to hospital were used to distinguish between COVID-19 and other causes in patients with hypoxaemic pneumonia. Patients with right upper zone consolidation were more likely to have non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) than COVID-19 pneumonia.Implications of the findings. The admission LUS score was unable to discriminate between COVID-19 pneumonia and non-COVID CAP, and did not correlate with the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired oxygen, clinical severity or mortality. The pattern was more valuable than the total LUS score in understanding the disease process.

南非COVID-19和非COVID-19肺炎的肺部超声检查:一项观察性研究
背景:肺部超声技术历来被应用于急性肺部疾病,以描述肺部病变,特别是在重症监护中。目的:探讨肺部超声(LUS)在新冠肺炎大流行期间低氧性肺炎住院患者中的作用。方法:本研究是一项单中心前瞻性观察性研究,纳入两组低氧血症性肺炎成年患者:COVID-19肺炎患者和非COVID-19社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者。一名肺科医生使用急诊床边肺超声(BLUE)方案进行了床边超声心动图(LUS),并由一名独立的盲法研究放射科医生验证了结果。结果:我们纳入了48例COVID-19肺炎患者和24例非COVID-19 CAP患者。COVID-19患者明显大于非COVID-19 CAP患者(中位数(四分位间距(IQR)),分别为52(42 - 62.5)岁和42.5(36 - 52.5)岁;p=0.007), HIV感染率较低(分别为25% vs 54%;P =0.01)和较高的高血压患病率(54% vs . 7%;P =0.002)和糖尿病(19% vs . 8%;p = 0.04)。在两组中,近30%的患者有严重的急性呼吸窘迫综合征。与C型相比,右上叶融合型b型与COVID-19肺炎显著相关(相对危险度(RR) 3.8;95%置信区间(CI) 1.7 - 8.6)。双侧LUS变化与COVID-19肺炎相关,而非单侧或无变化(RR 1.55;95% ci 1.004 - 2.387)。COVID-19肺炎患者与非COVID-19 CAP患者的肺中位评分(IQR)差异无统计学意义(分别为8(4 - 11.5)和7.5(4.5 - 12.5))。COVID-19肺炎患者的死亡率高于预期。Logistic回归分析显示,简化急性生理评分(SAPS II)较高(RR 1.11;95% CI 1.02 - 1.21)和较低的总LUS评分表明B线vs .实变(RR 0.80;95% CI 0.65 - 0.99)与死亡率相关。结论:右上带实变患者发生非COVID-19 CAP的可能性高于COVID-19肺炎。发现与巩固相反的B型与死亡率相关。入院LUS评分无法区分COVID-19和非COVID-19 CAP,并且与氧分压与分次吸氧比、临床严重程度或死亡率无关。研究简介:研究补充了什么。在COVID-19大流行期间,在资源有限、高患病率的环境中,入院时的肺部超声(LUS)模式用于区分低氧性肺炎患者的COVID-19和其他原因。右上带实变患者发生非COVID-19社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的可能性高于COVID-19肺炎。研究结果的含义。入院LUS评分无法区分COVID-19肺炎和非COVID-19 CAP,并且与氧分压与分次吸氧比、临床严重程度或死亡率无关。在了解疾病过程方面,该模式比LUS总分更有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine
African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信