Efficacy and Safety of Biologics and Immunosuppressants in Maintenance Therapy for Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Liangdong Zhu, Minfang Guo, Siyu Gan, Keyu Li, Yong Fu, Xia Chen
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Biologics and Immunosuppressants in Maintenance Therapy for Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: A Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Liangdong Zhu, Minfang Guo, Siyu Gan, Keyu Li, Yong Fu, Xia Chen","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.05.636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a potentially life-threatening systemic autoimmune disease. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of biologics and immunosuppressive agents in the maintenance treatment of AAV. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify the relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Nine RCTs involving 1,157 patients were included. For primary efficacy, rituximab had a lower relapse rate than azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (odds ratio (OR): 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.84 and OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.68, respectively). Based on the result of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), rituximab had the highest probability of reducing relapse (SUCRA = 86.6%), followed by cyclophosphamide (CYC), belimumab + AZA, methotrexate (MTX), AZA, and MMF. Regarding major relapse, rituximab also showed the highest probability (SUCRA = 93.6%). Concerning safety, there were no significant differences in the incidence of SAEs and serious infection among the different medicines. According to the SUCRA, MMF had the lowest probability of SAEs and serious infection. In conclusion, rituximab may be a treatment method for effectively reducing relapses in AAV patients during maintenance therapy among the medicines investigated. MMF has shown the lowest incidence of SAEs and serious infection. Key Words: Immunosuppressant, Rituximab, Meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54905,"journal":{"name":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","volume":"35 5","pages":"636-641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.05.636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a potentially life-threatening systemic autoimmune disease. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of biologics and immunosuppressive agents in the maintenance treatment of AAV. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify the relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Nine RCTs involving 1,157 patients were included. For primary efficacy, rituximab had a lower relapse rate than azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (odds ratio (OR): 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.84 and OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.68, respectively). Based on the result of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), rituximab had the highest probability of reducing relapse (SUCRA = 86.6%), followed by cyclophosphamide (CYC), belimumab + AZA, methotrexate (MTX), AZA, and MMF. Regarding major relapse, rituximab also showed the highest probability (SUCRA = 93.6%). Concerning safety, there were no significant differences in the incidence of SAEs and serious infection among the different medicines. According to the SUCRA, MMF had the lowest probability of SAEs and serious infection. In conclusion, rituximab may be a treatment method for effectively reducing relapses in AAV patients during maintenance therapy among the medicines investigated. MMF has shown the lowest incidence of SAEs and serious infection. Key Words: Immunosuppressant, Rituximab, Meta-analysis.

生物制剂和免疫抑制剂在抗中性粒细胞细胞质抗体相关血管炎维持治疗中的疗效和安全性:一项网络荟萃分析。
抗中性粒细胞细胞质抗体(ANCA)相关性血管炎(AAV)是一种潜在危及生命的全身自身免疫性疾病。本研究旨在比较生物制剂和免疫抑制剂在AAV维持治疗中的有效性和安全性。在Medline、PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行全面检索,以确定相关的随机对照试验(RCTs)。纳入9项随机对照试验,涉及1157例患者。在主要疗效方面,利妥昔单抗的复发率低于硫唑嘌呤(AZA)和霉酚酸酯(MMF)(优势比(OR): 0.47, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.26-0.84, OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.68)。从累积排序曲线下表面(SUCRA)结果来看,利美昔单抗降低复发概率最高(SUCRA = 86.6%),其次是环磷酰胺(CYC)、贝利单抗+ AZA、甲氨喋呤(MTX)、AZA和MMF。对于严重复发,利妥昔单抗的概率也最高(SUCRA = 93.6%)。在安全性方面,不同药物的SAEs发生率和严重感染发生率无显著差异。根据SUCRA, MMF发生SAEs和严重感染的概率最低。综上所述,在研究的药物中,利妥昔单抗可能是一种有效减少AAV患者维持治疗期间复发的治疗方法。MMF显示出最低的SAEs发生率和严重感染。关键词:免疫抑制剂,利妥昔单抗,meta分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
453
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (JCPSP), is the prestigious, peer reviewed monthly biomedical journal of the country published regularly since 1991. Established with the primary aim of promotion and dissemination of medical research and contributed by scholars of biomedical sciences from Pakistan and abroad, it carries original research papers, , case reports, review articles, articles on medical education, commentaries, short communication, new technology, editorials and letters to the editor. It covers the core biomedical health science subjects, basic medical sciences and emerging community problems, prepared in accordance with the “Uniform requirements for submission to bio-medical journals” laid down by International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (ICMJE). All publications of JCPSP are peer reviewed by subject specialists from Pakistan and locally and abroad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信