Timing and Method of Patient-Provider Communication for Abnormal Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Results in Cirrhosis.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00269
Jeremy Louissaint, Beverly Kyalwazi, John Deng, Timothy P Hogan, Robert W Turer, Elliot B Tapper, David E Gerber, Bryan D Steitz, Sarah R Lieber, Amit G Singal
{"title":"Timing and Method of Patient-Provider Communication for Abnormal Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Results in Cirrhosis.","authors":"Jeremy Louissaint, Beverly Kyalwazi, John Deng, Timothy P Hogan, Robert W Turer, Elliot B Tapper, David E Gerber, Bryan D Steitz, Sarah R Lieber, Amit G Singal","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with cirrhosis undergo frequent abdominal imaging including semiannual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening, with results released immediately via the patient portal. We characterized time from patient review to patient-provider communication (PPC) for patients with abnormal liver imaging results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients with cirrhosis enrolled in the patient portal with a new abnormal liver lesion (LI-RADS, LR) on ambulatory liver ultrasound (US) or multiphasic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging findings were grouped into low-risk (US-2, LR-2), intermediate-risk (US-3, LR-3), and high-risk (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M, LR-TIV) results. We extracted three date-time events from the electronic health record, including result release to the patient, patient review of the result, and result-related PPC. We compared communication methods and the median time with PPC after patient review of results between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 133 patients (median age, 62 years, 56% male) with 34 (25.6%) low-risk, 61 (45.9%) intermediate-risk, and 38 (28.6%) high-risk results. PPC for high-risk results was predominantly via telephone calls (60.5%), whereas portal messages were most commonly used for low- and intermediate-risk results (61.8% and 45.9%, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001). For patients who reviewed their result on the portal, most (79.3%) reviewed the result before PPC, among whom the median time between review and PPC was 55.8 (IQR, 22.0-219.0), 167 (IQR, 42.7-324.0), and 47.3 (IQR, 25.8-78.8) hours for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk results, respectively (<i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Portal-based review of abnormal imaging results by patients before provider communication is common, including results concerning a new HCC diagnosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes, such as psychological distress, associated with this method of disclosing cancer-related results.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with cirrhosis undergo frequent abdominal imaging including semiannual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening, with results released immediately via the patient portal. We characterized time from patient review to patient-provider communication (PPC) for patients with abnormal liver imaging results.

Methods: We identified patients with cirrhosis enrolled in the patient portal with a new abnormal liver lesion (LI-RADS, LR) on ambulatory liver ultrasound (US) or multiphasic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging findings were grouped into low-risk (US-2, LR-2), intermediate-risk (US-3, LR-3), and high-risk (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M, LR-TIV) results. We extracted three date-time events from the electronic health record, including result release to the patient, patient review of the result, and result-related PPC. We compared communication methods and the median time with PPC after patient review of results between groups.

Results: The cohort included 133 patients (median age, 62 years, 56% male) with 34 (25.6%) low-risk, 61 (45.9%) intermediate-risk, and 38 (28.6%) high-risk results. PPC for high-risk results was predominantly via telephone calls (60.5%), whereas portal messages were most commonly used for low- and intermediate-risk results (61.8% and 45.9%, respectively; P < .001). For patients who reviewed their result on the portal, most (79.3%) reviewed the result before PPC, among whom the median time between review and PPC was 55.8 (IQR, 22.0-219.0), 167 (IQR, 42.7-324.0), and 47.3 (IQR, 25.8-78.8) hours for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk results, respectively (P = .02).

Conclusion: Portal-based review of abnormal imaging results by patients before provider communication is common, including results concerning a new HCC diagnosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes, such as psychological distress, associated with this method of disclosing cancer-related results.

肝硬化患者异常肝癌筛查结果的医患沟通时机与方法。
目的:肝硬化患者接受频繁的腹部影像学检查,包括半年一次的肝细胞癌(HCC)筛查,结果立即通过患者门户公布。我们描述了从患者回顾到患者-提供者沟通(PPC)对肝脏影像学结果异常的患者的时间。方法:我们在动态肝脏超声(US)或多相计算机断层扫描/磁共振成像(mri)上确定了肝硬化患者,并在患者门静脉登记了新的异常肝脏病变(LI-RADS, LR)。影像学结果分为低危(US-2、LR-2)、中危(US-3、LR-3)和高危(LR-4、LR-5、LR-M、LR-TIV)结果。我们从电子健康记录中提取了三个日期时间事件,包括向患者发布结果、患者对结果的审查以及与结果相关的PPC。在患者回顾结果后,我们比较了两组间沟通方式和PPC的中位时间。结果:该队列包括133例患者(中位年龄62岁,56%为男性),其中34例(25.6%)为低危,61例(45.9%)为中危,38例(28.6%)为高危。高风险结果的PPC主要是通过电话(60.5%),而门户信息最常用于低风险和中等风险结果(分别为61.8%和45.9%);P < 0.001)。在门户网站上回顾结果的患者中,大多数(79.3%)在PPC前回顾结果,其中回顾和PPC之间的中位时间分别为55.8 (IQR, 22.0-219.0)、167 (IQR, 42.7-324.0)和47.3 (IQR, 25.8-78.8)小时,低、中、高风险结果(P = 0.02)。结论:在与医生沟通之前,患者对异常影像学结果进行基于门户的复查是很常见的,包括有关新HCC诊断的结果。需要进一步的研究来评估患者报告的结果,如心理困扰,与这种披露癌症相关结果的方法相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信