Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for treating gastric submucosal tumors: a longitudinal nested cohort study.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Lei Ma, Ruihan Liu, Chenhao Hu, Lei Zhang, Penghong Qu, Junjun She
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for treating gastric submucosal tumors: a longitudinal nested cohort study.","authors":"Lei Ma, Ruihan Liu, Chenhao Hu, Lei Zhang, Penghong Qu, Junjun She","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11775-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (RECS) is an emerging and promising therapeutic approach for treating gastric submucosal tumors (GSMTs). However, the efficacy of RECS has not been well established, and its high medical costs significantly limit its application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nested cohort study examined patients with GSMTs managed with different surgical techniques. A total of 314 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study, including 61 patients treated with RECS, 196 patients treated laparoscopically, and 57 patients treated with open surgery. To mitigate confounding bias, 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized. The perioperative outcomes, postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness among the three groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 51 patients were included in each group. Compared with the laparoscopic and open surgical groups, the RECS group presented significantly lower intraoperative bleeding volumes, times to first flatus, times to liquid intake, and postoperative hospital stay. The severity of gastrointestinal symptoms in the RECS group was notably better than that in the laparoscopic and open groups 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. Regarding long-term outcomes, there were no differences in overall or relapse-free survival among the three groups. The total hospitalization cost was significantly greater in the RECS group, primarily due to surgical cost differences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per quality-adjusted life year for the RECS group relative to the laparoscopic and open groups were 18,244 and 56,914 Chinese yuan (CNY), respectively. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicated that across all willingness-to-pay thresholds, the probability that RECS was cost-effective exceeded 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RECS is a safe and effective method for treating GSMTs, offering faster postoperative recovery and fewer gastrointestinal symptoms than laparoscopic and open surgeries. Despite the increased costs associated with the introduction of RECS technology, it remains a cost-effective option.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3959-3969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11775-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (RECS) is an emerging and promising therapeutic approach for treating gastric submucosal tumors (GSMTs). However, the efficacy of RECS has not been well established, and its high medical costs significantly limit its application.

Methods: This nested cohort study examined patients with GSMTs managed with different surgical techniques. A total of 314 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study, including 61 patients treated with RECS, 196 patients treated laparoscopically, and 57 patients treated with open surgery. To mitigate confounding bias, 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized. The perioperative outcomes, postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness among the three groups were compared.

Results: After PSM, 51 patients were included in each group. Compared with the laparoscopic and open surgical groups, the RECS group presented significantly lower intraoperative bleeding volumes, times to first flatus, times to liquid intake, and postoperative hospital stay. The severity of gastrointestinal symptoms in the RECS group was notably better than that in the laparoscopic and open groups 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. Regarding long-term outcomes, there were no differences in overall or relapse-free survival among the three groups. The total hospitalization cost was significantly greater in the RECS group, primarily due to surgical cost differences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per quality-adjusted life year for the RECS group relative to the laparoscopic and open groups were 18,244 and 56,914 Chinese yuan (CNY), respectively. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicated that across all willingness-to-pay thresholds, the probability that RECS was cost-effective exceeded 90%.

Conclusions: RECS is a safe and effective method for treating GSMTs, offering faster postoperative recovery and fewer gastrointestinal symptoms than laparoscopic and open surgeries. Despite the increased costs associated with the introduction of RECS technology, it remains a cost-effective option.

机器人和内镜联合手术治疗胃粘膜下肿瘤的临床结果和成本-效果分析:一项纵向嵌套队列研究。
背景:机器人和内镜合作手术(RECS)是治疗胃粘膜下肿瘤(GSMTs)的一种新兴且有前景的治疗方法。然而,RECS的疗效尚未得到很好的证实,其高昂的医疗费用极大地限制了其应用。方法:这项嵌套队列研究检查了采用不同手术技术治疗的gsmt患者。本研究共纳入314例连续患者,其中RECS治疗61例,腹腔镜治疗196例,开放手术治疗57例。为了减少混杂偏差,采用1:1:1的倾向评分匹配(PSM)。比较三组患者围手术期结局、术后胃肠道症状、远期结局及成本-效果。结果:经PSM治疗后,各组共纳入51例患者。与腹腔镜组和开放手术组相比,RECS组术中出血量、首次排气次数、液体摄入次数和术后住院时间均显著降低。术后3、6、12个月,RECS组胃肠道症状严重程度明显优于腹腔镜组和开放组。关于长期结果,三组患者的总生存率和无复发生存率没有差异。RECS组的总住院费用明显更高,主要是由于手术费用的差异。相对于腹腔镜组和开放组,RECS组每质量调整生命年的增量成本-效果比分别为18,244元和56,914元。成本效益可接受曲线分析表明,在所有支付意愿阈值中,RECS具有成本效益的概率超过90%。结论:RECS是一种安全有效的治疗gsmt的方法,与腹腔镜和开放手术相比,RECS术后恢复更快,胃肠道症状更少。尽管引入RECS技术会增加成本,但它仍然是一种具有成本效益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信