Trainee Awareness of US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Madaliene Denison, Jinman Cai, Hannah H Roberson, Ellen Lockhart, Farrell Adkins
{"title":"Trainee Awareness of US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines.","authors":"Madaliene Denison, Jinman Cai, Hannah H Roberson, Ellen Lockhart, Farrell Adkins","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02638-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a final recommendation to lower the initial age for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to 45<sup>1</sup>. At many institutions, trainees play a critical role in the implementation of CRC screening guidelines. The aim of the current study is to assess trainee awareness of recent changes to CRC screening guidelines. Trainees in surgical and non-surgical residency and fellowship programs at a single academic medical center were surveyed, in February of 2023, regarding awareness of recent changes to CRC screening guidelines. Additional information regarding trainee recommendations for various types of screening modalities and their perceptions of patient awareness was obtained. A total of 116 trainees responded to the survey, reflecting a 39% response rate. Of trainees recommending CRC screening, 75% recommended screening to be initiated at age 45, 13% at age 50, 6% at age 40, and 2% at age greater than 50. Trainee knowledge of screening guidelines came from medical school learning (70.7%) and USPSTF guidelines (82%). The most recommended screening modalities were colonoscopy (87%), fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) (31%), and fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) (15%). In comparing trainees who perform colonoscopies versus trainees from primary care specialties, there was no statistical difference between groups regarding knowledge on current screening guideline recommendations. Most trainees recommended CRC screening during their training. Unfortunately, many trainees were unaware of recent changes to CRC screening guidelines. These results revealed an important knowledge gap to be addressed among surgical and non-surgical trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02638-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a final recommendation to lower the initial age for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to 451. At many institutions, trainees play a critical role in the implementation of CRC screening guidelines. The aim of the current study is to assess trainee awareness of recent changes to CRC screening guidelines. Trainees in surgical and non-surgical residency and fellowship programs at a single academic medical center were surveyed, in February of 2023, regarding awareness of recent changes to CRC screening guidelines. Additional information regarding trainee recommendations for various types of screening modalities and their perceptions of patient awareness was obtained. A total of 116 trainees responded to the survey, reflecting a 39% response rate. Of trainees recommending CRC screening, 75% recommended screening to be initiated at age 45, 13% at age 50, 6% at age 40, and 2% at age greater than 50. Trainee knowledge of screening guidelines came from medical school learning (70.7%) and USPSTF guidelines (82%). The most recommended screening modalities were colonoscopy (87%), fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) (31%), and fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) (15%). In comparing trainees who perform colonoscopies versus trainees from primary care specialties, there was no statistical difference between groups regarding knowledge on current screening guideline recommendations. Most trainees recommended CRC screening during their training. Unfortunately, many trainees were unaware of recent changes to CRC screening guidelines. These results revealed an important knowledge gap to be addressed among surgical and non-surgical trainees.

培训生对美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)结肠直肠癌筛查指南的认识。
2021年,美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)发布了一项最终建议,将结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的初始年龄降至451岁。在许多机构,受训者在实施CRC筛查指南方面发挥着关键作用。本研究的目的是评估受训者对近期CRC筛查指南变化的认识。在2023年2月,对一个学术医疗中心的外科和非外科住院医师和奖学金项目的受训者进行了调查,了解最近CRC筛查指南的变化。获得了关于培训生对各种筛查方式的建议以及他们对患者意识的看法的其他信息。共有116名学员参与了调查,回复率为39%。推荐CRC筛查的学员中,75%建议在45岁开始筛查,13%在50岁,6%在40岁,2%在50岁以上。培训生对筛查指南的了解来自医学院学习(70.7%)和USPSTF指南(82%)。最推荐的筛查方式是结肠镜检查(87%)、粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)(31%)和粪便隐血检测(FOBT)(15%)。在比较进行结肠镜检查的受训者与来自初级保健专业的受训者时,在当前筛查指南建议的知识方面,两组之间没有统计学差异。大多数受训者在培训期间建议进行结直肠癌筛查。不幸的是,许多受训者不知道最近CRC筛查指南的变化。这些结果揭示了一个重要的知识差距,以解决在外科和非外科受训人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信